Why Does Haidt Use The Metaphor Of The Elephant?

1231 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays on personal identity

Philosophy Discussion #10

Monday’s reading (the first chapter of the book by Jonathan Haidt), explores a number of the themes we’ve been discussing thus far regarding personal identity, such as consciousness, the nature of mind, split brain research, etc.
When you do the reading, you’ll note that Haidt uses the metaphor of an elephant, to get us to think about what Kahneman had called System 1 and System 2 thinking.
1) After doing the reading, how would you summarize the main argument of what Haidt is saying? How do you see it relating to what we’ve discussed so far?
2) Why does Haidt use the metaphor of the elephant? Do you find this to be a good metaphor (do you find yourself agreeing or disagreeing with this)? Explain why.
Here is another …show more content…

Does the study seem to support what Haidt (and Kahneman) are saying? Explain why, or why not.
Part …show more content…

I think Haidt uses the elephant because it displayed our lack of control. The elephant (automatic reactive thought) is large and is going to do whatever it want no matter what the rider (controlled conscious thought) wants. However, the rider is clever and can cajole the elephant to do what it wants, if it learns how the elephant works. By using an elephant he shows that our conscious thought is relatively small compared to the rest of our systems. It illustrates that we think we have control when in actuality, we do not. It also shows that it both rider and elephant are going in the same direction, that are virtually unstoppable. In other metaphors the conscious thought is some kind of driver that can be strengthened so that it has better control over the other systems, but as we know, this is not necessarily true. With the elephant, we can see that we do not have much control as we would like to think, but it also illustrates Haidts other point that we are the whole package, elephant and rider. It shows that it is less about control and more about understanding and acceptance. So, in conclusion, yes I think this is a good metaphor that illustrates Haidts points

Show More
Related

  • Essay I Learned To Love A German By Mordecai Richler

    447 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Conclusion, “Shooting an Elephant” and “1944: The Year I Learned to Love a German” essay are similar in the way that politics work in the narrator

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Barbara Gowdy's White Bone

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    So far this book was a nice little surprise. Like previously stated, upon picking this book up one would think that the author is crazy for writing about the lifestyles of elephants. But when it is actually explored and read its written style and messages make for this book to be taken in very easily and fluently. This language used is at the perfect level, and the subject level is complex enough that the reader has to make connections themselves or else they will become confused almost guaranteed.

    Read More

  • The Allegory Of The Cave And Shooting An Elephant

    1280 Words  | 3 Pages

    All of three essays say that people’s attitude toward the reality and explain the reasons why people like to stay in their “cave” and are unwilling to face the reality is because of their fear and ignorance. Moreover, “The Allegory of the Cave” and “Shooting an Elephant” are more similar because both of them use symbolism to expand notions and use allegory in their essay. In“The Allegory of the Cave,” the darkness, the shadows, and the sunlight all represent ignorance and enlightenment. The fire, the prisoners, the puppeter and the light all had abstract qualities that go back to mankind’s behavior and Plato’s argument. In the“Shooting an Elephant,” the elephant represent the British Empire. The death of the elephant symbolize imperialism of British Empire will fade and die off, as well as cowardice of the police and the ignorance of the

    Read More

  • Comparing Where Are you going, Where Have You Been and Hills Like White Elephants

    1329 Words  | 3 Pages

    Elephants'." Studies in Short Fiction. 17.1 (Winter 1980): 75-77. Rpt. in Literature Resource Center. Detroit: Gale, 75-77. Literature Resource Center. Gale.

    Read More

  • Imagination In Charles Siebert's 'Elephant Crackup'

    1414 Words  | 3 Pages

    This knowledge and empathy combined would anthropomorphize elephants, “imagining” them as more human-like and would lead to coexistence, aka the “trans-species psyche”. In Siebert's “An Elephant Crackup?”, elephants and humans as a whole are in conflict with each other due to not knowing why the other group is aggressive and thus are in constant retaliation to each other (Siebert 322). A trans-species psyche can not be achieved if humans do not imagine elephants are equal beings. This imagination is not simply making up things as if they were lies, imagining elephants as more human teaches humans that they are emotionally and socially on the same level by emphasizing their “mind's eye”; giving another perspective of elephants than just wild animals ready to be poached. An example of people being blind to imagination is shown in an incident when a herd of elephants killed a man near the village Katwa, but buried him out of respect. The elephants themselves “elephantmorphize” the human so the human is like them, but the humans that want to retrieve the man's corpse do not anthropomorphize the elephants. The human villagers shoot gunfire on the elephants to drive them away, causing future generations of traumatized and violent elephants (334). Without imagination, people would not be able to understand others(which don't have to be human) causing a lack of empathy, a trait important for creating the “trans-species psyche” that Siebert

    Read More

  • Hills like White Elephants by Ernest Hemingway

    1361 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, the short story ‘Hills like White Elephants’ contains symbolism to a high degree. The most important of all symbolism is perhaps the "white elephant". As we all know, a white elephant is a gift that nobody wants. To correlate this to the story, the white elephant is the baby who wants to abort template hesitant.

    Read More

  • Hick´s Hypothesis About Religions

    1410 Words  | 3 Pages

    Each person is convinced that they are right and the others are wrong because of what they know and have experienced. What they don’t realize is that they are all technically right because they are each describing a different aspect of the elephant. The same analogy can be applied to the major religions of the world.

    Read More

  • Esther Greenwood's Search for Identity in Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar

    1059 Words  | 3 Pages

    One’s identity is the most important lesson to be learned. It is vital part of life knowing who you are in order to live a fulfilled life. Without knowing your identity, and the way you perceive life, it is difficult for others to understand you, along with a struggle to live a happy life. In Sylvia Plath’s “The Bell Jar,” Esther Greenwood struggles to find her own identity, and in the process, she develops a mental illness which helps her discover the person she is on the inside.

    Read More

  • Personal Identity by Derek Parfit

    1917 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his 1971 paper “Personal Identity”, Derek Parfit posits that it is possible and indeed desirable to free important questions from presuppositions about personal identity without losing all that matter. In working out how to do so, Parfit comes to the conclusion that “the question of identity has no importance” (Parfit, 1971, p. 4.2:3). In this essay, I will attempt to show that Parfit’s thesis is a valid one, with positive implications for human behaviour. The first section of the essay will examine the thesis in further detail, and the second will assess how Parfit’s claims fare in the face of criticism. Problems of personal identity generally involve questions about what makes one the person one is and what it takes for the same person to exist at separate times (Olson, 2010).

    Read More

  • The Use of Metaphors in Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the essay ?Shooting an Elephant? by George Orwell, the author uses metaphors to represent his feelings on imperialism, the internal conflict between his personal morals, and his duty to his country. Orwell demonstrates his perspectives and feelings about imperialism.and its effects on his duty to the white man?s reputation. He seemingly blends his opinions and subjects into one, making the style of this essay generally very simple but also keeps it strong enough to merit numerous interpretations. Orwell expresses his conflicting views regarding imperialism throughout the essay by using three examples of oppression and by deliberatly using his introspection on imperialism.

    Read More

  • Criticism Of Diego Velàzquez's Las Meninas, Sebastiàn de Morra, and Baltasar Carlos and a Dwarf

    3946 Words  | 8 Pages

    ...asting perfection and imperfection of the two little figures almost unavoidably becomes a metaphor of the social and natural order.

    Read More

  • Life and Death

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    One can analyze the story of “Hills Like White Elephants,” in the form of the structuralist perspective by using the system of binary oppositions. Robert DiYanni states in the text “Literature Approaches to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama,” that “Structuralist critics find all kinds of opposition in literature, from small scale elements, such as letters and syllables; through symbols, such as light and dark; to motions or directions (up and down)... places (inside and outside)... to elements of plot and character , such as changes of feeling and reversals of fortune” (1583). In addition, Isaiah Smithson’s definition of structuralist criticism supports Robert DiYanni’s statement. He defines it as “A method of analyzing phenomena, as in anthropology, linguistic, psychology, or literature, chiefly characterized by contrasting the elemental structures of the phenomena in a system of binary oppositions” (Smithson 145). Also, one can use Richard Webster’s definiti...

    Read More

  • True Power in "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell

    1473 Words  | 3 Pages

    The quest for power is one which has been etched into the minds of men throughout history. However, it can be said that true power is not a result of one’s actions but comes from the following one’s own beliefs without being influenced by others. This principle sets up the story for Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell. The protagonist, Orwell himself, is a sub divisional police officer in Burma, a British colony. Orwell must try to find and use his inner power when he is faced with the decision of whether or not to kill an elephant which has ravaged the Burman’s homes. The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell, as a colonist, should be in control. As well, the perspective and ideas given by Orwell show his true character and lessen the overall power set up for him. Lastly, the symbols shown are representations of traditional forms of power, but take on different implications in the story. In Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell uses setting, characterization and symbols to show that true power comes from following the dictates of one’s conscience.

    Read More

  • What Is The Theme Of Symbolism In Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell

    711 Words  | 2 Pages

    In George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant”, the author describes how he is in a very special and difficult circumstance. The background information he provides in the introduction explains how he was born and raised in India, but attended school in England. Soon after, he became an officer for the English government but was stationed over in India during their imperialistic reign. This knowledge is essential to the reader in understanding Orwell’s thoughts and emotions while reading. Throughout the story, symbols such as the rifle, the elephant, and even Orwell himself represent the British’s power over the people, the evils of imperialism, and the slow decline of the British empire.

    Read More

  • The Self: Clifford Geertz, Horace Miner, And Andrei Toom

    1177 Words  | 3 Pages

    Humanity is defined by one major factor: one’s understating of the self. By understanding one’s self, one can understand society and the world that surrounds themselves. There is one thing that can often distort one’s personality, one’s identity. By identifying as one thing a person can often change how they act or do certain things. This is often found to hide one’s true motives or intention, but it can also be used to hide hidden factors that aren’t as prevalent. One’s personality and identity are very closely linked, and tend to play off one another. This fact can be show in within multiple works. To name a few authors who demonstrate this fact: Clifford Geertz, Horace Miner, and Andrei Toom. Their works seek to dive deeper

    Read More

More about Why Does Haidt Use The Metaphor Of The Elephant?

Open Document