Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Inside the mind of edgar allan poe and
Inside the mind of edgar allan poe and
Psychology in poes writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In court, one may try to use the insanity plea. The insanity plea is when someone could not tell right from wrong during the time that the crime was committed, or if the person could not control their actions when committing the crime. Pleading insane only works one percent of the time in modern day court. Tell-Tale Heart, by Edgar Allan Poe, is a fictional story about a man who kills an older blind man because the way his eye looks paranoise him. The man, who also narrates the story, spends seven nights looking at the old man while he sleeps, plotting his death. On the eighth night, the narrator murders the old man and hides the body, only to confess out of guilt to the police when they come over that night. The narrator should not be able to use the insanity plea in a court of law. The insanity plea should not be allowed because the narrator has an idea that he did something wrong, and the narrator was able to control his impulses when he murdered the man. While some may say …show more content…
that the narrator is insane because he hearkened the old man’s heartbeat, he is only hearing his own heartbeat out of anxiety. When the narrator commits the murder, he knows right from wrong and he knows what he is doing, which contradicts the M’Naghten and Irresistible Impulse laws. In a court of law, the narrator of the story should definitely not be able to use the insanity plea. During the time of the crime, the narrator was very nervous. This proves the narrator sane because of the M’Naghten laws. The M’Naghten laws state that if the defendant did not understand that what he was doing was wrong, or a crime, then they are not guilty. The M’Naghten laws were first established in 1843 when Daniel M’Naghten proceeded to assassin the Britain Prime Minister. In Nicholson 2 court, he was found not guilty because it was proved that he did not understand that killing was wrong during the crime. The main character of the story can not use the insanity because at the time of the crime, he was nervous. An insane person would not be nervous during the crime because they would not believe that they were doing something wrong. When the narrator is in the process of committing the crime, he explains that, “...I am nervous: so I am.” (Line 112) When the narrator says that he is nervous, he is showing that he has some moral compass that is telling him that what he is doing is a crime. So, since the narrator is nervous during the crime, one can see that he knows the difference between right and wrong. Another reason why the narrator can not plead insane in court is because of the Irresistible Impulse law. These laws state that if the defendant was unable to control his impulses when the crime was committed, and this led to a criminal act, then the defendant is insane. During the time of the crime, the narrator was in control of the actions he was doing while killing the old man, proving him sane. After the narrator leaps into the old man’s room, he expresses that he, “...dragged him to the floor and pulled the heavy bead over him.” (Line 121) The narrator is fully aware and in control of his actions when he kills the man. When the narrator is deliberately following his impulses by killing the old man, he is confuting the Irresistible Impulse laws. While the main character is sane and can not use the insanity plea, some may believe that he was insane during the time the crime was committed. Some people may argue that the narrator is sane when they say that him hearing the heartbeat of the old man during the crime was a hallucination caused by his unstable mental state. One may think that this is true because of one’s belief that a person is insane if they have sharpened senses. This claim is not valid because when the narrator is hearing the heartbeat, he is clearly experiencing a massive amount of anxiety. This anxiety can cause hallucinations of many things, including sounds. So, what the narrator thought was the sound of the old man’s heartbeat, is actually his anxiety and Nicholson 3 nerves causing him to hallucinate his own heartbeat.
In the story, when the narrator leaps into the room to kill the old man, he expresses the beating of the heart when he says, “But the beating grew louder… I thought the heart must burst.” (Line 111) As one can see, the narrator, who is already nervous, is having the utmost anxiety about killing the man, causing him to experience the beating of the heart. In an article on anxiety hallucinations, the text states that people with anxiety can experience auditory hallucinations when under a great deal of nervous tension. This applies to the narrator when he thought he was hearing the old man’s heartbeat. Evidently, when the narrator was nervous about killing the old man, he was having a great amount of anxiety, provoking him to hear his own heartbeat. While some may suggest that the narrator having acute senses when hearing the old man’s heart beating proves him insane, the heartbeat is unquestionably his own heartbeat caused by his
anxiety. Since the narrator was nervous and in control of his actions during the time that the crime was committed, he shows that he knows he was doing something wrong and he shows that he was not doing something that he did not want to do. This proves him to be sane during the time of the crime according to the M’Naghten and Irresistible Impulse laws. As stated by the M’Naghten laws, if the defendant failed to distinguish right from wrong during the time of the crime, then the defendant can use the insanity plea. Also, according to the Irresistible Impulse laws, if the defendant was incapable to control his impulses during the crime, then he can use the insanity plea. One could declare that the narrator hearing the heartbeat because of his mental unstableness is a sign of insanity, but clearly, the heartbeat is his own anxiety causing him to have a hallucination. The narrator in the novel Tell-Tale Heart should not be able to use the insanity plea in a court of law because he is sane. Not only are insanity pleas are rarely granted in court, some of the people who it is granted to are not Nicholson 4 even diagnosed as being insane, allowing the possibility that there is nothing wrong with their mental state.
What is sit to be insane? The legal definition of insanity at Law.com states, “Mental disorder… a person who cannot distinguish fantasy from reality…” In the tell-tale heart, a story written by Edgar Allen Poe, The Narrator (the main character) plots to kill The Old Man. His reason being: he believes the old mans “vulture” eye had cursed him. The Narrator is constantly defending his sanity but evidence can prove otherwise.
After the old man is dead and under the floorboards the police arrive, and the narrator remains calm and his "manor had convinced them.?Villains!" "Dissemble no more! I admit the deed! -- tear up the planks! -- Here, here! -- it is the beating of his hideous heart!" The narrator of "The Tell Tale Heart" shows that he is unreliable. Concluding the questioning by the police, the narrator had a sudden fear and assumed that the policemen have heard the old man?s heart beat. Not only the narrator could hear the old man?s heart beating, but it is assumed (from the audience perspective) that the police could hear the narrator?s heart beating. The narrator listening to the old man?s heart beat is a replacement of his own consciousness that brought out the guiltiness for murdering the old man.
When he finally succeeded in murdering the old man he became glorified, thinking about how cleverly he accomplished his goal. However, the unsuspecting behaviour in front of the policeman, suggests that the narrator became ignorant of his behaviour and surrounding. This is because he cannot tell the difference between reality and his inner thoughts. He presumes that he has correctly and reasonably explained all the events of the story in a typical manner. Furthermore, he thinks the police officers and the neighbours hear the heart beating through the walls. Instead, it’s all in his mind because the heartbeat would only be heard when the narrator was in stress. This relinquishes us a clue that the heartbeat was a symbol of agony to him. The sound in the last few paragraphs of the short story is noticeable as an increase in sound. In the short story it states, (Poe, pg 106) “The ringing became more...it continued and became more distinct”. The increase of the beating is emphasized repeatedly. His repetition of the word “louder” echoes the sound of the heart beat. Finally, he shouts out his confession. (Poe, pg 106) “ I admit the deed!...here, here! --it is the beating of his hideous heart!” The main point is the narrator couldn’t distinguish whether this was reality or his inner thoughts. Only the narrator could hear the heartbeat, therefore this specific reasoning makes him
Many people who have read “The Tell Tale Heart,” argue whether or not the narrator is sane or insane. Throughout this paper I have mentioned the main reasons for the narrator being sane. The narrator experienced guilt, he also was very wary executing the plan, and the intelligence level of his plan to murder the old
In Tell-Tale Heart, the narrator is “tortured” in a piercing ringing as he accommodates a group of policemen sent to the old man’s house to investigate. While he is making small talk with the men, a sharp ringing appears, growing louder and louder as time passes. In hopes to rid himself of the noise, the narrator attempts to talk faster, changing the pitch of his voice as time progresses. This is described as follows, “I talked more quickly—more vehemently; but the noise steadily increased” (Tell-Tale Heart 4). However, these attempts were made futile as the ringing never ceased, ultimately prompting the narrator to admit his crime. The noise could be inferred as the manifestation of the guilt the narrator contains for killing the old man, of who was a kindred spirit and had watched over the former. It could also be said that the noise is the beating of his heart, of which the rate of the heartbeat would increase as he becomes more nervous and anxious. Correspondingly, the husband in The Black Cat has the same problem. In addition to the murder of Pluto, the husband attempted to kill to his second cat, of which did not result in the death of the actual cat, but the wife instead as she moved to protect the pet. In his rush to hide the evidence of his murder, the narrator accidentally walls up the living black cat with his wife. Once officers come to investigate the
Edgar Allan Poe uses what can be considered a disturbed type of writing. The reason why Edgar Allan Poe became famous was due to the fact that he wrote stories related to horror and mystery. In the story “Tell-Tale Heart”, Poe used time, location, and mood and atmosphere, among others. Poe was considered to be insane, but to what extent did his insanity go, and where does his real ability to use setting as a way to set a dark tone begin?
In 1843, testifying that one is insane became a useful defense. When Daniel McNaughtan attempted to assassinate British Prime Minister Robert Peel, he failed. Instead, McNaughtan killed Peel's secretary but was found not guilty by reason of insanity at the trial. The United States criminal justice system quickly adopted this new law of not guilty by reason of insanity, established by the McNaughton Decision. Although he was found not guilty, McNaughtan spent twenty years in a mental asylum until his death. Although helpful to truly insane criminals, the insanity plea has many flaws when it comes to the victims. Pleading insanity should be outlawed because it is unfair to the victims’ families, dangerous to society, and ambiguous in its interpretation.
Though the narrator just murdered the innocent old man, he believes he is justifiably sane and calm. This ironically, is not the case in retrospect. After burying the evidence of the murder the police arrive and question the narrator of the screams the neighbor reported. Still during this time, the narrator thought he was completely justified and sane. He kept reassuring himself they knew nothing while chatting and answering their questions. Just as he thought he was in the clear for the murder of the old man, the narrator begins to hear a thumping and beating noise. He is alarmed by the noise, worried the police who are questioning him are hearing the same noise he is. The noise he is hearing is of a heart. Not his own heart, nor the heart of the old man he just murdered, but is the cadence and realization of his own guilt. Throughout this story, it is obvious that he is either criminally insane and this story is real and has happened, or it is all in his imagination. The setting of this story is not known, so he could either be in prison telling this story, or in an insane asylum. Regarding the beating heart he is hearing, it symbolizes and shows satire in the murder that he has committed. After hearing the noise loudly and clearly, the narrator confesses to the police who he thinks also can hear the noise. The irony of his
The insanity plea, or the “irresistible impulse” defense, described by Martin (1998) as “a plea that defendants are not guilty because they lacked the mental capacity to realize that they committed a wrong or appreciate why it was wrong.” Remains a very controversial within the judicial system, with many believing that the defense attempts to fake a purportedly guilty man’s insanity, more often to make sure the defendant gets a less harsh conviction or the possibility of an acquittal. While the plea is truly helpful to many who suffer from mental illness, many who do not suffer from illness try to use it as a get-out of-jail-free card.
In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” the narrator attempts to assert his sanity while describing a murder he carefully planned and executed. Despite his claims that he is not mad, it is very obvious that his actions are a result of his mental disorder. Hollie Pritchard writes in her article, “it has been suggested that it is not the idea but the form of his madness that is of importance to the story” (144). There is evidence in the text to support that the narrator suffers from paranoid schizophrenia and was experiencing the active phase of said disease when the murder happened. The narrator’s actions in “The Tell-Tale Heart” are a result of him succumbing to his paranoid schizophrenia.
It grew quicker and quicker, and louder and louder every instant.” Our narrator is hearing the incessant beating of a heart that isn't functioning- clearly an auditory hallucination. Another psychological symptom he experiences are delusions, mainly described as believing something that isn’t true, which could take for in the belief others are out to ‘get them’ or are making fun of them in some manner. When talking to the police, who suspected nothing, the narrator thinks “And still the men chatted pleasant, and smiled, Was it possible they heard not? Almighty God!--no,no!
In Edgar Allen Poe’s, “The Tell-Tale Heart,” we are left with the question, is the suspect guilty of premeditated murder, or is he just criminally insane? The suspect’s actions, have caused an innocent man to die, just because he had a blind eye. The suspect, claimed he was afraid of the old man’s pale blue, blind eye, with a thick hazy film over it. He also stated he wasn’t killing the man for his gold, but instead for his well being of not seeing the eye again. The opposition, claims, the suspect didn’t know how to deal with his fear of the eye, so he murdered him.
Winslade, William J, Ph.D, and Judith Wilson Ross, The Insanity Plea: The Users & Abusers of the Insanity Defense, New York
The horror story “The Black Cat” by Edgar Allan Poe introduces us to an unreliable narrator who tells of the events happening in his household. In the story he kills his cat and his wife. He ends up confessing every detail of the murders to the court. His lawyers claim that he is insane so he will not be charged with the death penalty. The argument for this situation is if he is really insane or are they just saying that he is to avoid the consequences. The narrator is insane because he murdered his wife and cat.
The basis of insanity is upon M’Nagten Rules (1843) which set forward the principles of a defence when the “defendant had a defect of reason” or a “disease of the mind” and was not able to understand the nature of the act they did or did not know what they were doing was wrong. These three conditions must be proved for the defence of insanity to become available. Insanity is available for the all cases that require mens rea except for strict liability cases.