Why Do You Think That Courtly Readers Are Better Than Carnal Readers

305 Words1 Page

1. Courtly readers threat all books with the most absolute respect. Courtly readers disapprove of misuse and physical abuse of books. They believe in conserving the state in which books are kept in perfect condition. On the other hand, Carnal readers are the complete opposite. To them, the printed text in the books hold more of an important value than the physical aspect of the book. Carnal readers write on textbooks, tear off pages, cause damage, hard use, and bend pages for page-marking instead of using bookmarks.

2. Fadiman thinks that carnal readers are superior than courtly readers. She states numerus times that courtly readers miss-out on life experiences that are only associated with findings in writing on books, notes, and meaningful experiences for some. Carnal readers create lifelong memories by taking the liberty to utilize them in any way. She uses the example of her daughter at age 22 months, spilling egg yolk onto her cooking book. That egg yolk stain will remind Fadiman of her baby girl every time she opens that cooking book and sees the stain. Courtly doesn’t work with younger children either.

3. …show more content…

The Purpose of comparing the love of books with the love of people is to try and relate the two. How people can be two different kinds of lovers. Likewise, courtly lovers and carnal lovers. Just like the books. People love certain attributes about a family member or significant other. Treating them with respect, dignity, and kindness. At the same time, people have their flaws and weaknesses. They learn from mistakes. This in a way relates to the carnal reader because they write, draw, and neglect books, but it helps with the learning process. Caring and hard use of textbooks is like what love is to people. It’s not a sign of disrespect but of intimacy

Open Document