Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The history of politics
Culture of Korea
The role of power in politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The history of politics
Throughout history, mankind has depended on power and freedom, and that has been shown through the government and citizens of that country. Though each had used their power to do what is right for them, but have abused and did not use it correctly. But from examining governments and citizens laws, it is clear that the governments should have the power to create laws and policies for the citizens even though some people argue that the citizens should have the right. For example the government has had momentous transformation from the beginning of their time to now, but the laws that they have made have protected “We The People”, and also gave us freedom and the adjustability between each law and rule, for example the Constitution and the Bill …show more content…
Although the people in Korea are not able to wear certain clothes, have certain haircuts, and more because of their customs and beliefs, and some governments abuse their power and provoke their citizen’s rights. Such as the citizens in Korea and the “middle eastern” areas of Asia and Europe, and they can not wear certain clothes, and have certain haircuts, and this is also repeated in the story of “Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea”, and for example in North Korea there is not an independent judicial system, and plus they religious freedom does not exist, and more. However that government has not had much success even when not in control, but from the main standpoint is that other governments have succeeded with citizen opinions and setting limits, such as the constitution of the United
"North Korea: Human rights concerns." Amnesty Australia. Amnesty International, 28 Nov. 2006. Web. 2 May 2014. .
1984 demonstrates a dystopian society in Oceania by presenting a relentless dictator, Big Brother, who uses his power to control the minds of his people and to ensure that his power never exhausts. Aspects of 1984 are evidently established in components of society in North Korea. With both of these society’s under a dictator’s rule, there are many similarities that are distinguished between the two. Orwell’s 1984 becomes parallel to the world of dystopia in North Korea by illustrating a nation that remains isolated under an almighty ruler.
(migrationinformation, 2008). Citizens of North Korea do not attain the freedom to leave and experience other states. North Korea’s lack of freedom not only affects their citizens but also individuals from other countries in a negative sense, cutting off social bonds as a result. Not having mobility rights is an infringement on their negative liberty on account of the option of immigrating or emigrating not being available to them due to the laws placed by the government. In actuality, citizens “caught emigrating or helping others cross the border illegally are detained” (migrationinformation, 2008).
No one would ever think that a small country could create a controversy known the world over, but North Korea has achieved this goal. The North Korean genocide has claimed 2000 people a day and these killings are from starvation and beating. Many people think communism is better than democracy, but it has its faults. For example, North Korea is Communist and whatever the leader’s beliefs, the Communist citizen has to believe. What is happening and what happened is genocide.
We often wonder about the importance of government. Is it necessary? Does it really benefit society? The answer is yes. Many countries have diverse forms of government such as totalitarian, monarchy, theocracy, and much more. The United States of America specifically runs a democratic type of government. A democratic government gives power to the people. Citizens over the age of eighteen are allowed to elect leaders based on their individual opinions through voting rights. The main purpose of the American government is, to protect people’s inalienable rights to life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness as our Founding Fathers intended.
To mitigate the risk of social rebellion, the North Korean government has started the social control. The social control is harsh and it should not be used in any condition or it will bring dreadful consequences. For instance, by controlling people in Waknuk, the entire society turned into one that was absolutely intolerable towards individual and unique. The culture of the community was surrounded by the beliefs of “ONLY THE IMAGE OF GOD IS MAN” and “WATCH THOU FOR THE MUTANT”, these beliefs brainwashed the entire society and lead to actions such as “slaughtering two-headed calf, four-legged chicken” and so on. The society of Waknuk represented the social control and implied countries such as North Korea who uses it as a way to rule the
The colonists attitude about rights is illustrated in the statement “We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Ellis 15). These words, taken from the Declaration of Independence, are the most influential in our country’s political culture, even today. This document was drafted by Thomas Jefferson in 1776. Today, it is read and analyzed constantly in not just America, but all over the world as well. Granted, it was based on gaining Independence from the British Crown’s rule, but its contents still holds true even today. It gives strength to the “underdog” in society to know even his government believes he is created equal. It puts fear into the soul of any to-be tyrant, letting him know—we will not stand back and allow you to bully us. It also makes it quite clear that if the people do not find solace in the government, if they are bullied and persecuted consistently by this government, then they have the right to overthrow the oppressors and again, start ane...
North Korea could be described as a dystopian society. For all of its citizens, the Internet is widely monitored and restricted, allowing only limited access. “One could speculate that it is more propaganda about the country, its leaders, or negative coverage about the US.... ... middle of paper ... ...
It is up to the citizens to decide. If the yearning to be free overcomes the fight to grasp power, then a new wave of democracies will begin overcoming the old authoritarian rule. Everyone has the right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
There has been a long-established controversy over the duty of a citizen in a democracy, on which the Athenian philosopher, Socrates, and the American writer, Henry David Thoreau, had their own thoughts. Both philosophers had varying views on numerous subjects relating to government and conscience. Should the citizen obey all laws, even unjust ones? Or, should they rebel for the sake of doing what is right? Democracy is ruled by the people, for the people. In both Socrates’ time, and Thoreau’s, the question remains on whether this was, in practice, true. The two iconic philosophers’ opinions regarding the duty of the citizen in a democracy, the role of conscience, and the importance of nonviolent resistance, still influence people to this day. Their views augment the understanding people have of the current democracy, how consciences deal with right and wrong, and roles as citizens questioning every issue. Philosophy is often ingrained in the history, politics, and the environment
However, with great power comes great responsibility, and most governments that allow too much power will crack under the pressure and implant complete security to protect their power from being taken by another leader that is not their main choice, or by the public through revolution. A sensible country will not allow its government to achieve either, as both will affect the country significantly in a negative spotlight. However, balancing freedom and security doesn’t take away all the problems, as having the same amount of freedom and security is impossible in reality and will soon tip into either side, and having more security than freedom will make citizens protest outside and inside of the area of influence by the government, and the awareness created can lead to tragic aftermath. This is why having more freedom than security while allowing the government to regulate individual actions that can adversely affect others, as total security will lead to totalitarianism and tyranny, allowing more security over freedom will generate resentment, severe riot, and, total freedom will lead to chaos and anarchy. Everyone wants power in one way or another, no matter if it is used for good, bad, or in-between.... ...
It is a sort of wooden gun to the people themselves. But it is not the least necessary for this; for the people must have some complicated machinery or other, and hear its din, to satisfy that idea of government which they have. Governments show thus how successfully men can be imposed upon, even imposed upon themselves, for their own advantage. It is excellent, we must all agree. Yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way.
A key feature of the unwritten constitution is ‘the Separation of Powers’. This exercises the idea of independence within ‘different functions of government’; it is represented by the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Separating the three prevents a dangerous occurrence where power is entirely centralized in one group. Cooperating with one...
But again, the creation of our government was only the application of ink to paper, it can only succeed if the conditions of democracy, our social contract, are observed and “we the people” play an active role in its workings. Aristotle, one of the first democratic thinkers in history said, “If liberty and equality, as is thought by some are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in the government to the utmost.” As citizens we must be participants in order to preserve liberty and equality. We hold to our end of the social contract by obeying the law, and respecting the rights and liberties of others “For to be free” said Nelson Mandela “is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.” Furthermore as citizens we must be informed and participate in the political process in a meaningful manner, if we don’t understand the issues at hand there is no way that we can defend our personal liberties and interests. We don’t have to all be professionals in the field of politics, this is one way that our representative form of government protects us, but we do have to understand the basic issues and be able to voice our opinions about those. By all these means, we as citizens have the solemn duty to defend the principles that made and keep our country
Law is one of the most important elements that transform humans from mere beasts into intelligent and special beings. Law tells us what is right and wrong and how we, humans, should act to achieve a peaceful society while enjoying individual freedoms. The key to a successful nation is a firm, strong, and fair code of high laws that provides equal and just freedom to all citizens of the country. A strong government is as important as a firm code of law as a government is a backbone of a country and of the laws. A government is a system that executes and determines its laws. As much as fair laws are important, a capable government that will not go corrupt and provide fair services holds a vital role in building and maintaining a strong country.