Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Behind the mask: anonymity on the internet
Introduction :
With the advent of the internet, anonymity is easily achieved. Anyone can make a account on social media spaces under a pseudonym which allows them to be anonymous.
Plowman and Goode defines anonymity as state when individuals shed their identity and normative standards, which leads to reduced self-awareness. We define internet anonymity as a state where an individual feels like he/she is not being tracked, recorded or viewed whilst using the Internet.
Why is this topic important? The internet affects everyone - in a way or another. According to Statista, there are 3.17 billion Internet users worldwide. In a Triple Canopy article entitled “anonymity
Carnegie Mellon University provides an insight into the motivations of people going anonymous on the Internet in a 2013 study entitled “Why Do People Seek Anonymity on the Internet? Informing Policy and Design”. Kang, Brown and Kiesler state that Internet users seek anonymity to manage the line between their online and offline selves in order to preserve others’ perception of them. One instance is seeking help or doing other activities that might make them seem socially undesirable or needy, such as when using online dating sites or support groups, hence they would prefer to go anonymous (4). The study also found that people pursued anonymity in online activities that being identified might expose to them to personal threat such as exposure of personal information to hackers,online flaming or harassment (5).
In an article for entitled “The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog”, Christopherson states that the nature of the Internet coupled with the anonymity it offers makes it a safe place for catharsis which is “ the unhindered expression of thoughts and feelings to others,” without the fear of being socially evaluated by others (3041). With a Washington Post article entitled “Cyber-Catharsis: Bloggers Use Web Sites as Therapy” Noguchi reports that blogging enables people to broach difficult subjects with loved ones, as well as gain support from a virtual community of people they don't know (par.
The word “privacy” has a different meaning in our society than it did in previous times. You can put on Privacy settings on Facebook, twitter, or any social media sights, however, nothing is truly personal and without others being able to view your information. You can get to know a person’s personal life simply by typing in their name in google. In the chronicle review, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide,'" published on May 15th 2011, Professor Daniel J. Solove argues that the issue of privacy affects more than just individuals hiding a wrong. The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. Solove starts talking about this argument right away in the article and discusses how the nothing-to-hide
There is considerable utilitarian value in extending privacy rights to the Internet. The fear that communication is being monitored by a third party inevitably leads to inefficiency, because individuals feel a need to find loopholes in the surveillance. For instance, if the public does not feel comfortable with communica...
In Is Anything Private Anymore, Sean Flynn gives a central message of his text that society does not have privacy anymore. We may think some things about us are “anonymous”, but in real it is not. Nothing stays as a secret, there is always someone who sees or hears you. Bankson who got documented twice shows us that nothing stays anonymous. The article claims that we are not only being watched outside but on social media as well and everything we do on internet is being monitored. Ina modern world we live right now, having privacy is impossible because by our name and phone number our information can be accessed. Social network may seem fun but it may affect you in many ways in future. “You learn why posting pictures of you riding the mechanical
“Human beings are not meant to lose their anonymity and privacy,” Sarah Chalke. When using the web, web users’ information tend to be easily accessible to government officials or hackers. In Nicholas Carr’s “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty,” Jim Harpers’ “Web Users Get As Much As They Give,” and Lori Andrews “Facebook is Using You” the topic of internet tracking stirred up many mixed views; however, some form of compromise can be reached on this issue, laws that enforces companies to inform the public on what personal information is being taken, creating advisements on social media about how web users can be more cautious to what kind of information they give out online, enabling your privacy settings and programs, eliminating weblining,
Exchanging privacy for the benefits of the use of internet. In Plotz's essay “Privacy is Overrated” he want's to convince people to not be too concerned about privacy and to try to be more open. He gives many examples that could convince people into being more open. For example, he writes “But I bet you want to know if your baby-sitter has ever been convicted of child abused, if your business partner has a history of bankruptcy if your boyfriend is still married”(68). Yes I agree that this is tr...
2. Previous Research: There is a debate as to whether Internet use has a positive or negative impact in our social lives. One study found that for 40% of the college students in their sample, the Internet had been instrumental in the formation of new friendships. Moreover, 7% of their sample had used the Internet to find a romantic partner. The participants in the study claimed that one of the main benefits of communicating through the Internet was reduced social anxiety and shyness (Knox, 2001). In another study, there was evidence that lonely individuals were more likely to use email and the Internet in order to stay connected with others—in theory, giving them a healthier social life—however, evidence showed that heavy use had a negative social impact (Morahan-Martin, 2003). Finally, another study found that individuals comfortable or regularly involved in social gatherings reported more positive effects from Internet use than shy individuals less involved in their community (Kraut, 2002).
To begin, consider how countries handle the privacy of individuals in general, not exclusively in the electronic environment. Most countries around the world protect an individual’s right to privacy in some respects, because “privacy is a fundamental human right that has become one of the most important human rights of the modern age”2. Definitions for privacy vary according to context and environment. For example, in the United States Justice Louis Brandeis defined privacy as the “right to be left alone”3. In the United Kingdom, privacy is “the right of an individual to be protected against intrusion into his personal life or affairs…by direct physical means or by publication of information”4. Australian legislation states that “privacy is a basic human right and the reasonable expectation of every person”5. Regardless of varying definitio...
Catherine, P. (March 2008). The Anonymity Experiment. Writing in the Writing Disciplines, 11(3), 387 – 396
Internet users at the ages of 12 to 13 years generally understand the social complexities of the internet at the same levels as adults. As they get older and gain experience online, they engage in more complexes and interactive internet use puts them at greater risk than younger, less experienced youth who use the Internet in simpler, less interactive ways ((Livingstone & Sonia,2006). Among youth ages 12- to 17-years-old, it was those ages 15 to 17 that were most prone to take risks involving privacy and contact with unknown people. On the other hand, the target who are the most vulnerable to online victimization that have histories of sexual abuse, sexual orientation concerns, and patterns of risk taking off- and online have minor risk in involved again because of the experienced (Jones & Jemmot, 2009) .
When we mention the word ‘privacy’, we mean that there is something very personal about ourselves. Something that we think others are not supposed to know, or, we do not want them to. Nevertheless, why is it so? Why are people so reluctant to let others know about them entirely? This is because either they are afraid of people doing them harm or they are scared that people may treat them differently after their secrets are known. Without privacy, the democratic system that we know would not exist. Privacy is one of the fundamental values on which our country was established. Moreover, with the internet gaining such popularity, privacy has become a thing of the past. People have come to accept that strangers can view personal information about them on social networking sites such as Facebook, and companies and the government are constantly viewing a person’s activity online for a variety of reasons. From sending email, applying for a job, or even using the telephone, Americans right to privacy is in danger. Personal and professional information is being stored, link, transferred, shared, and even sold. Various websites, the government and its agencies, and hospitals are infringing our privacy without our permission or knowledge.
Privacy is a value we hold close and dear as a society. We do not advertise to others of our weaknesses or our confidential personal interactions. Most of the population does not want to get involved or want to know about other private issues. So privacy can protect the rest of us from being exposed of too much personal information. Autonomy allows us to speak out about injustices and ability for self-expression. The irony is that we feel safest when we know everything about them but they know nothing about you. Here is where a fine line is drawn between privacy and security. Privacy is built from a level of trust. As one’s trust level increases through ongoing relations, the self-guarded privacy begins to fade. When privacy and/ or trust have been compromised then relations are broken and the safe-guards are back in place.
It has become a sad and upsetting fact that in today’s society the truth is that the right to one’s privacy in the I.T (information technological) world has become, simply a joke. In an electronic media article “No place to hide”, written by James Norman, two interesting and debatable questions were raised: ‘Are we witnessing the erosion of the demarcation of public and private spaces brought on by the networked economy and new technology?’ Also, ‘What roles do government, industry and citizens have in regard to censorship and privacy?’ These statements ultimately end with the fact that it is impossible for Net users to expect privacy online, because online privacy doesn’t exist. However, one must ask, ‘What will be done about the problem?’ while keeping in mind that yes, the thin line between public and private spaces has been severed as a result of new technology. It is vital that everyone as users of the internet, be it government, Internet Service Providers (ISP’s), or individuals, need take the issue of internet privacy very seriously, while basing all actions towards the issue with the moral statement of, ‘Rights aren’t free, they’re earned’.
Part of the allure of the Internet has always been the anonymity it offers its users. As the Internet has grown however, causing capitalists and governments to enter the picture, the old rules are changing fast. E-commerce firms employ the latest technologies to track minute details on customer behavior. The FBI's Carnivore email-tracking system is being increasingly used to infringe on the privacy of netizens. Corporations now monitor their employees' web and email usage. In addition to these privacy infringements, Internet users are also having their use censored, as governments, corporations, and other institutions block access to certain sites. However, as technology can be used to wage war on personal freedoms, it can also be employed in the fight against censorship and invasion of privacy.
Privacy can be experienced in a number of forms. Alan Westin defined four states – or experiences – of privacy: solitude, intimacy, anonymity, and reserve. Solitude is a physical separation from others (31). Intimacy is a “close, relaxed, and frank relationship between two or more individuals” resulting from the “corporate [collective] seclusion” of a small unit (31). Anonymity is the “desire of individuals for times of 'public privacy'” (32). Lastly, reserve is the “creation of a psychological barrier against unwanted intrusion [which] occurs when the individual's need to limit communication about himself is protected by the willing discretion of those surrounding around him” (32). It is this last state of privacy that is the most crucial to the preservation of the self. As Robert Murphy observe...
Privacy was once referred to as being able to do things one considered private without anyone knowing except for those that were around to encounter it. Nowadays privacy has no set and stone definition, but one may see it as committing a private act and hoping no one finds out. However, things considered private can quickly become public thanks to the new high-tech equipment that has been introduced over the past decades. Social networks such as Facebook and Twitter have this feature “Check-In” that allows you to do just as it says, check-in. This fe...