Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of religion in influencing morality in society
The influence of religion on society
The influence of religion on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A tick, not like a tick of a clock but the tick of your mind, what makes a person who does horrible things tick? People who have bad behaviors are all around us. We even have bad behaviors, though we try to be “good”. Bad behaviors are unavoidable, they are natural instincts to man. Some people, who are hypocritical, say that it makes us a monstrous person to behave such ways, but can it even be helped? There is no such thing as a monster, it’s human nature for people to make bad choices, when people make these choice it’s influences from variables in their environment.
Some might feel that a person's choices can be justified by certain situations. That certain reasons can make a bad behavior okay. However, this is not true because of “deactivation of moral standards,” which is the justification of bad behavior. “It starts with the assertion that people believe we are more moral than we actually are, but the process of moral disengagement leads us to act immorally, and justify our bad behavior,” Craig Johnson a leadership ethicist
…show more content…
explains. When a person desire a certain outcome and they rationalize solutions for their outcomes. Such as killing someone in revenge, their thoughts are of justice but committing the same sin it’s an emotional reaction which they use the process of moral disengagement. Other variables such as emotions also affect our thoughts, they are huge influences on our actions. It’s usually natural people justify their thought and actions. Trying to moralize their desires to engage in affairs. With influences of other people and even media it makes it easier for humans to moralize their bad behaviors. Justifying our thoughts is almost like lying which is a normal behavior in humans and animal alike. "Certain conditions have to be in place for a statement to rise to the level of a lie," explains philosophy professor James E. Mahon of Washington and Lee University. "First, a person must make a statement and must believe that the statement is false. Second, the person making the statement must intend for the audience to believe that the statement is true. Anything else falls outside the definition of lying that I have defended." When a person lies they either do it intentionally or as a natural instinct due to the threat of self-esteem. It’s phycological, people tend to lie more at higher level when they feel threatened. It doesn’t necessarily make a person a bad person if they lie depending on circumstances. As all people have lied in some point in their lives, it’s quite natural. Violence has been one of the cases that have determined if a person is good or bad. Violence is a natural survival instinct in species. "Aggression occurs among virtually all vertebrates and is necessary to get and keep important resources such as mates, territory and food," said study team member Craig Kennedy, professor of special education and pediatrics at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee. "We have found that the reward pathway in the brain becomes engaged in response to an aggressive event and that dopamine is involved." Throughout history humans have been know with violence. Many wars over territory, mates, pride and resources such as animals fight over the same things. We aren’t far off from natural survival of species that we are still part animals also. Violence doesn’t necessarily make us bad people either. It’s a natural survival skill. We tend to crave dominance over territory, food and mates. "Aggressive behavior has evolved in species in which it increases an individual's survival or reproduction, and this depends on the specific environmental, social, reproductive, and historical circumstances of a species. Humans certainly rank among the most violent of species," says biologist David Carrier of the University of Utah. Understanding the basic survival of all species explains our makeup as humans. Humans have moralized natural instincts to don’ts with our complex thinking. “Once a cheater, always a cheater” doesn’t necessarily ring true to all people who cheat. “More than 90% of Americans believe infidelity is unacceptable, yet 30-40% of people engage in it. Infidelity is associated with adverse outcomes such as depression, domestic violence, divorce, even homicide.” Kelly Campbell is an Associate Professor of Psychology at California State University, San Bernardino. There are 3 explanatory reasons why people cheat in their relationships.
Relationship issues, Individual reasons such a gender, personality, religiosity and lastly situational reasons. People of power such as stars and politicians are called horrible people once found out of cheating. When really cheating happens to be common among humans. Individual reasons relate to gender, males are usually the first to condone to infidelity since they have higher level of testosterone and a higher sex drive than females. Personalities such as traits also are influences on people’s choices. Religion is strong beliefs and they can guide a person through bizarre paths. Situations is life can also affect people’s choices. If they feel threatened it makes certain reactions happen. Along with all types of emotions to certain event. The human brain is so complex and all so different also. So many variables that affect each and everyone one of
us. Lying, violence and cheating are normal behaviors in humans and these certain things don’t necessarily make people monsters since it’s product of our chemical makeup and environments. Factors of our world trigger our reactions of survival and that doesn’t make us that far off from animals. Every human had experienced bad behaviors from one time to another. People trying to moralize us as a species is what cause most of our problems. These behaviors are all normal and every human uses them for whatever situation they are in. So the following questions is when do these behaviors become excessive?
... from previous experiences and bases future decisions on what they have experienced. When a person makes a decision that isn’t justified, they unknowingly change how they view future problems. If the decision has not been based in truth, it allows them a certain amount of unearned freedom to make wrong decisions, as opposed to when one make a proper decisions. It is crucial that every decision made is justified in order to keep their moral compass steady and to make the proper decisions when the choice is hard.
Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson have written a book that many people may find difficult to read. Why? Because it is like holding a mirror in front of one’s own face and looking into it. The book is about something most, if not all of us, have done: Justified our actions or words no matter how wrong they were. As Tavris and Aronson (2007) wrote in their book, “. . . most of us find it difficult, if not impossible to say, ‘I was wrong; I made a terrible mistake.’ The higher the stakes – emotional, financial, moral – the greater the difficulty.”
I agree with Strawson in saying that we are not truly morally responsible for what we do, in a mental respect at least. Though it suffers from many faults, there are also ways to even more clarify his argument, as I will hope to do so in the following. First off, Strawson states that for someone to be truly morally responsible, we have to understand the points that he has given. The first being that we do what we do because of the way we are. These just states that the things we do and decide are based upon how we are in that moment, in mental respects. For example, when it comes to choosing what to eat between options A or B, I will choose option A because of how I am. But if you were to choose, it would be dependent on the way that you are
There has been a huge debate throughout the years of whether humans are ethical by nature or not. Despite Christian Keyser’s research evidence that humans are ethical by nature, the evidence from the Milgram experiment shows that we are not ethical by nature. Humans learn to be ethical through genetic disposition as well as environmental factors such as culture, socialization, and parenting. In order to understand if we are ethical or not, we need to understand the difference between being moral or ethical. Many people believe that being moral and ethical are the same thing, but these two terms are a bit different. “Morality is primarily about making correct choices, while ethics is about proper reasoning” (Philosopher, web). Morality is more
Many times people are tested every day and struggle with the moral duty with what is right and what is wrong. For example Many Americans are married with children and know that entering the sanctity of marriage, understanding that no man or woman shall come between them. However, many marriages end on the bases of adultery between one or the other. Knowing and understanding as young adults that committing adultery is wrong. Many Americans still continue to cheat on their spouse. Knowing the moral value of marriage, but still risk breaking the value of marriage. During this moral dilemma of adultery, many wrong doings have been violated, such as dishonesty that comes with adultery and the moral commitment that was taken for granted. Other ethic principles are violated when one or the other commits adultery. Trust issues will arise if a person has been caught committing destructive ethical act. Violation from using household money to commit adultery for outings, hotel stay, buying gifts. Along with other financial necessity to commit adultery. Quality time spent away from family while committing adultery is also an ethical violation in the sanctity of marriage. Even abuse of alcohol could be a factor in
...hile some say it is nature and others say it is nurture, I believe it to be a little of both. Even though there are the few cases such as Rhoda who had the so called perfect but yet in the end turned into a cold hearted killer. Yet again you have children such as Beth who was raised in such a horrible environment and lost the sense of remorse and feeling and turned into psychopath. With all this said it comes down to nature and nurture to form a dangerous psychopath. Although there are some occasions where nature was the only factor and sometimes nurture is the only factor, when it comes to the end you have to take both aspects into consideration. Even with all the research we have we still do not know the definite reason why someone turns into this ruthless monster. Even though we think it has to do with nature and nurture, the world may never know the real reason.
A person’s morals, or ethics, depend on their own beliefs on what is right and what is wrong. There are the norms of the public eye on what is right and wrong, but an individual develops his own morals over time and believes what he wants. In the world today, the media has created a more strict line between good and bad, and just about anything in the media is bad. Being a “good” person in the eyes of the media is very difficult. These views that the media have, have changed people’s own morals and their views on others.
Scott, Shirley L. "What Makes Serial Killers Tick? — Monsters or Victims? — Crime Library on TruTV.com." TruTV.com: Not Reality. Actuality. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
Defying a mindset set in place by society can have as much weight as breaking a law does. In Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, society’s mindsets come into play a lot. When Mayella Ewell kissed Tom Robinson it was seen as an immense violation even though this violation was not an actual crime. Mindsets set in place by society cause people to make atrocious decisions because they are afraid of what will happen if they go against society; society is a monstrous controlling factor in our world and can cause people to make regretful decisions.
All people worldwide go through the process of moral reasoning, which has been defined as "a cognitive process by which individuals make decisions about moral issues and justify these decisions, regardless of the context of the issue" (Gardiner, 1998, p.176). But not all of these people come to the s...
Even the most moral person in the world should do unjust things if they knew they could never be caught, because they have the opportunity to gain something with no repercussions. People in society would see one as a fool if they knew some person had the chance to do something beneficial towards oneself without the chance of getting in trouble, and did not pursue. People do not believe that acting morally benefits one personally, only the status of being a moral person; when the opportunity appears, people will choose to act immorally because they feel it advances them from their current state. One does not strive for true morality, but instead attempt to be perceived as a moral person, to gain status in society, through unjust acts. This goes to show that people truly see morality not as an intrinsic good, but rather as an instrumental good, used to acquire more material goods and resources. People view the choice to act morally as a nuisance, not because that is their first choice of action. People will choose the action that benefits them over not receiving any benefit, unless they feel they can be caught or have to suffer injustice in the future and consequently would put them in a worse situation in the long
Every individual is taught what is right and what is wrong from a young age. It becomes innate of people to know how to react in situations of killings, injuries, sicknesses, and more. Humans have naturally developed a sense of morality, the “beliefs about right and wrong actions and good and bad persons or character,” (Vaughn 123). There are general issues such as genocide, which is deemed immoral by all; however, there are other issues as simple as etiquette, which are seen as right by one culture, but wrong and offense by another. Thus, morals and ethics can vary among regions and cultures known as cultural relativism.
For example, religion is a big reason that people do what they see as “right’. The problem with being moral is that who says what is moral and what is not. Like I stated earlier, I think that we are born with an understanding of what is right and that it either is manipulated through time and circumstances, but I understand that it is naive for me to believe that, but I still choose to. That is what the main sections of this class have discussed. Even though we have talked about several different takes on what is morally good and how people have different views I am sure that there are a lot of other views that we didn 't discuss, which makes this topic, so hard to find a definite answer and which is why I can only offer my opinion on
A few have been found as “innate intense sexual drive, combined with a low extrinsic motivation for social acceptance or "honor”.” ("What Motivates Sexual Promiscuity?"). This drive is a “daimonic” (“What Motivates Sexual Promiscuity?”). This daimonic is a power that takes over the whole person. It controls your mind and actions. Once this drive takes over, it leads people to act on promiscuous feelings. They then may lead to cheating on their partner, or moving around having multiple partners. This drive has recently increased in our society. Although not much has been found as to why, this increase in drive has led to an increase overall promiscuity within our
Cause and Effect Essay – The Causes of Divorce. From the past to present, people all over the world have determined to live together, which is called “get married” in another word, so that they depend on each other for living. Nevertheless, some couples are unable to maintain their relationship; therefore they choose divorce, which is one of the solutions to cope with problems between husband and wife. Furthermore, most people think carefully before they get married.