Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of british colonialism in india
Cold war arms race
Brexit influence on uk economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of british colonialism in india
Why Britain Tried to Join the EEC in the 1960's
Before the 1960s Britain deceived itself and thought of itself as the
leader of the world. Britain therefore saw its future as secure. The
reality, by the 1960s, was that Britain used to be a world power and
was no longer a leader of the world. Britain watched its empire
crumble around itself. Britain subconsciously knew that it was
becoming ever less powerful but did not fully recognise it until the
1960s.
Britain joined the EEC because of many related factors. Firstly Great
Britain finally, by the 1960s, recognised their loss of great power
status. Prime Minister Macmillan spoke his ‘Winds of Change’ speech in
February 1960. This speech outlined the fact that Britain had to
recognise its lower international great power status and had to act
quickly.
The recognition of Britain’s loss of great power status factor is
closely linked with the fact that Britain’s empire had disintegrated.
Britain saw its empire come apart. In the 1940s India, Burma and
Ceylon became independent. Britain had lost their ‘Jewell’ of the
empire, India. Britain had now lost its empire which led to the
breakdown of Britain’s great power status.
The fact that Britain had lost its empire is linked to the fact that
Britain could no longer have the close relations with other countries
anymore which led to the breakdown of British trade and therefore its
economy. Britain had economic difficulties by the 1960s. The EEC was a
solution in fixing these economic problems. Britain could not turn to
its ‘good friend’ the US because the relationship between the two
countries was breaking down. Britain could not keep up with the cold
war arms race due to its weakening economy.
Linked to why Britain tried to join the EEC, was the success of the
EEC. As an organisation it worked perfectly. It was constantly growing
economically and physically. The EEC offered Economic co operation
which worked well. The EEC united Europe. Britain wanted to be a part
of it.
Britain wanted complete support to prevent Germany’s hegemony in Europe, but the people of the United States believed Japan was the real enemy. This became evident during the two most important conferences of World War II between the United States and Great Britain that established a solid coalition; Casablanca and Trident.
The benefits of the European Union outweigh the costs. Ever since the end of World War II, countries in the EU have been helped economically, politically, and culturally.
In answering the above question, I shall address myself first to examining manufacturing exports and the British position, followed by a word on the Imperial Preference which hindered British trade flows with the rest of the world. I shall go on to talk more generally about whether there has been a decline in the aggregate economy (essentially exploring the pessimistic implied in the title). Further, I shall argue that the British economy has performed well against some serious cultural and structural constraints and should not be subjected to unduly negative analysis.
Throughout history, the British have been a nation of sailors and businessmen. With the dawn of the imperial era, money began to equal power, and the wealth of the British elevated them to the top of the world. As Sir Walter Raleigh said,
The United Kingdom was a member of the European Union. The European Union is an example of the second most integrated arrangement, the economic union. Therefore, voting to leave is a direct effort to reverse regional economic integration.
Going in to war, Britain is interested in territorial expansion in Europe and sees France as a
The British Empire was equally a powerful imperial system, but for differing reasons. Its monarchy has led them to success with nationalism and patriotism, and even some of their own thought that ruling over more countries (particularly India) would make them “the greatest power in the world” (Roberts, p. 225). They were interested in imperializing and having control over others, to spread their beliefs and government across the seas. All they needed was “food, raw materials and cash” while they supplied “minerals and capital and sold services” and traded their goods with Europe (Roberts, p. 50).
In 1857 the British had invaded the nation of Hindustan (India). Many feel that if it were not for the British Empire, India would still be an under developed country. The British established a government system that before did not exist. It was a three level system including the imperial government located in London, the central government located in Calcutta, and later on provincial governments scattered throughout the regions of what was known as the British Raj1. Alt...
These “Inner Six” nations thus laid the framework for further integration of other nations within the region and its supranational principles were what led to the creation of the European Economic Community in 1957, further assimilating the European countries’ economies. The creations of these communities for economic purposes were meant to promote cooperation amongst European nations to prevent the further outbreak of violence which had subsided with the end of WWII. Through these general agreements of economic importance came further integration through the creation of more agreements throughout the 1960s, such as the abolishment of customs duties amongst their borders, creating free trade and border trade tax pacts among the Inner Six and across their borders to other signatory nations.
“We are not a nation, but a union, a confederacy of equal and sovereign state.” Dear fellow Americans, the British are out here stealing our ships, our goods and our people! These ignorant Brits need to be taught a lesson and learn some manners. The only way that we can do that is to, simply, declare war. They have continued to supply their, own, navy with our population simply because their people, themselves, will not do it. These people are forcing our brothers, husbands, cousins, or uncles to work for their selfish ways as in working for their navy. While our brothers are working, the British runoff trading with Native Americans, providing them with their own weapons so that the Native Americans can attack us. This attacking, and awful
Europe was a powerfull continent, wich ended with the second world war. Then Europe was in ruins, but even so, it was the beginning of a new golden age.
British Priminister Winston Churchill was part of the founding idea to create a 'United States of Europe'. After the atrocities of WW2 he felt that the only way for 'peace' to occur was to create a united Europe; eliminating nationalism and war hungry political opposition. He believed that an allied Europe could fight against anti fascism and Nazism through European integration.
The decision to grant independence to India was not the logical culmination of errors in policy, neither was it as a consequence of a mass revolution forcing the British out of India, but rather, the decision was undertaken voluntarily. Patrick French argues that: “The British left India because they lost control over crucial areas of the administration, and lacked the will and the financial or military ability to recover that control”.
Gaining membership to the European Union (EU) has been a frustrating process for Turkey. The Near East nation began its campaign for EU membership nearly 30 years ago under the EU’s predecessor, the European Economic Community. In 2005, 18 years after beginning the application process, Turkey was finally invited to enter accession negotiations. The protracted delay was a result of unfavorable economic conditions in Turkey as well as Turkey’s tumultuous relationships with EU members Greece and Cyprus. Yet, the question remains: why hasn’t Turkey been granted membership to the EU?
A major stage of defining the most essential factors that led to the birth the nowadays European Union is to analyze every step that was carefully planned, therefore shaping this construction as a modern powerful alliance. “From the creation of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and the European Economic Community (EEC) in the 1950s, European integration has been one of the most central phenomena in the contemporary history of (western) Europe” (cited from Wolfram Kaiser and Antonio Varsori, 2010). Hence, this construction firstly began in 1952 known as the ECSC with six members, mainly as an economic alliance between France and Germany, that would cooperate in the production of coal and steel and it would further develop into a political shape that had to toughen Franco-German solidarity, by removing the memories of the freshly ended war and to find a new way to integrate Europe as a social, economic and political community that would vastly change, improve and influence the present world.