It is never okay to break the law. Nobody is better than anyone in American we are all equal and that we are all the same. We are united as one and no one can say that's wrong. There are limits in this world that we have to follow so that later on in life for we won't disappoint the people we love. Being able to respect each other and that being who you are without hiding yourself is what everybody in this world wants to do without having fear. The law is made for a reason why break it. To those who break the law they would suffer from punishment that would be served to them. Putting away criminals are what makes the world safe from people who actually cares about everyone. For example let's say there was this one person that went on a killing …show more content…
For breaking the law you must have a great reason for breaking any laws that's been written before out time. Rules are there for a reason so nobody in this world can break it because if we didn't have rules like I said this world we be chaos. For example, Donald Trump thinks that he can write and speak everything he thinks he can but he can't like for example he tried to ban anyone from coming in and going out. The rules were simple until the court system denied Trumps rule because it isn't authorized to say who or who doesn't get to leave. Being able to prove Trump wrongs and amazing because he thinks he can do anything just because he is the President he has another thing coming at him. Moreover, breaking the rules and getting trouble for it isn't the way to go because you knows what the consequences are at the end once you broke the law. The law is here to protect and serves us right or wrong and we must follow it until proven wrong at anytime period that has been served. To the answer the question if it's alright to break the law my answer is No because breaking anything without any meaning is just wrong and why would it be there if there wasn't any meaning behind
The Rule of Law is a legal standard that requires the government to use its power according to well-established, clearly defined rules, regulations, and principles of a given society. In other words, “the highest level of authority is a body of law that applies equally to all” (Shafritz, Russell, & Borick, 2016, p. 188). This means that the government and its officials are accountable to the laws of the land. That being said, the laws are only as good as the intentions of those who are interpreting them.
On the word of Martin Luther King Jr., “An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the
Civil rights activist, Martin Luther King Jr, says “An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law.”
No one possesses the same morals or beliefs. Morality does not have a black and white answer because no one is exactly alike. Everyone has their own opinion and right to voice that opinion, and there are numerous ways of doing so. As a citizen with my own beliefs, I believe I have the right to violate laws if I feel morally obligated to. The amount of progress that America has made in such a short amount of time is astonishing. In some ways it seems as if the only way to make any headway is to speak up. If I was morally opposed to a policy or law I would go against it due to its effectiveness, individualism, and past history of the world that has made immense progress.
I don't think it's right to break the law, no matter what the circumstances are. Breaking the laws is wrong, and people shouldn't think that it's an okay thing to do. If you don't agree with the law, you should try to get in contact with someone high up in the government and explain to them your stance on the issue, and why you believe it needs to be changed, or removed altogether. The laws are in place for a reason, and that is to protect us. American citizens need to start respecting the laws more, and respect those who enforce them.
I am extremely sorry for what happened, it was unlawful. I understand that shoplifting is wrong. It was an embarrassing experience, it is an experience I intend to learn and grow from. I am sorry for stealing from your store and wasting your time. I promise you this will never ever happen again. I am ashamed of my actions and I promise to never repeat them
It is very interesting to see that even though when someone breaks the law in the United States, they will still be protected by that very law. Even as one violates the rights of others, the law will make sure that their rights are protected. It almost seems that has more rights by breaking the law instead of following it. Police are prevented from using extreme force against them and lawyers are at the ready to serve these criminals. Criminals have forfeited their rights when they have violated the rights of others. Why should the law be so intent on protecting their rights, when they have no intent on following the law?
The more I thought about that and about those who write the laws, or at least define what law is, the more profound it became. I believe we all will agree that the United States is a nation of criminals. From its inception as a settler nation, exiled British criminals stole the land and lives from Na...
Is breaking an unjust law justified or punishable? Unjust laws cause people to rebel because they go against their beliefs. In the play Antigone by Sophocles, Antigone goes against the law to help her family member. The pressures of society cause Antigone and modern day physicians to go against the laws and take action on events that no one else is going to act upon because they do not have the courage to do so. Patients suffering from a terminally ill disease that give their consent to the doctor, give the right to their doctor to euthanize them. Situations in modern society like euthanasia demonstrate how breaking the law can be justified in certain situations of life and death. Sophocles’ Antigone and many sources demonstrate a persons’ justification for breaking unjust laws when they cause suffering and violence and violate people’s morals.
For sure, there are criminals who have no conscience to guide them as they walk these streets. For sure, there are sick people in the world whom rather molest a child before one of age, which neither is justified. And for sure they are people who would act as God and take ones life away because they feel like it. It is the reality of society, however, we must not incarcerate people for the small things, instead we must help them as citizens.
To conclude, it is morally permissible to break the laws when it is morally right to do so, the law is unjust or out-dated. It is true that laws reflect what the society thinks, but this rule of majority could repress and tyrannize the interests of the minorities, such as AIDS patients. Thus, it is morally permissible to break the law under certain conditions.
middle of paper ... ... When disobeying laws, one must have a higher purpose, respecting the will of the masses. Gandhi and King both pointed out that they never advocated breaking laws on the sly for personal convenience, they attacked unjust laws at their own risk in order to improve the society. Accordingly, while admitting that it is reasonable and necessary to disobey unjust laws undermines the interests of the public, we should also recognize the value of laws, deeply respect them and behave strictly as the just laws.
In criminology Larry Siegel defines public-order crimes as “crimes which involves acts that interfere with the operations of society and the ability of people to function efficiently” (Siegel). So what is the difference in violating the “law” and committing crimes against “public order?” Public order crimes are often viewed as laws that don’t have an apparent victim. Such crimes may include prostitution, drunkenness and disorderly behavior, gambling, and drug use and abuse. Drug use and abuse is one of the most damaging public order crimes...
These are all reasons why people believe it is wrong for a person to steal, of course it also goes against the law, but I am speaking to its morality, not legality. There are three circumstances when there can be an exception to this rule, unlike moral absolutes which are exceptionless. The first example is when a parent
We are a nation of laws because we have to build a foundation to strengthen the government and be well run country. everyone is governed the same way. To protect people from each other. It’s to prevent crime before it happens to assure every American are safe and in order to