Why Ban The Sales Of Cigarettes Summary

1006 Words3 Pages

On the article, Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition Dr. Robert N. Proctor states that “Cigarette is one of the most deadly artifacts that has been made in the history of human civilization”. (http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/22/suppl_1/i27.full)
According to http://healthliteracy.worlded.org/ cigarettes have over 4’000 chemicals that can slowly pour down the smokers by leading them into a dangerous health problem. Health problems like cancer, heart disease, pulmonary diseases, stroke, osteoporosis and many more diseases that's unimaginable. Likewise, pregnant smokers are at high risk of abortion or the infant may suffer abnormality or any health trouble. Not only does cigarette affect smokers, but also non smokers …show more content…

Proctor, R,. N. (2013) (http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/22/suppl_1/i27.full) explained that it also damages the economy, sales of cigarettes can cause financial burden and financial losses from diminished labor productivity.Sales of cigarettes it is a powerful corrupting force in human civilization and can encourage smuggling. The sales of cigarettes are one of the reasons why crime rate increases. Though objection usually raised to any call for a ban that the sales of cigarettes will encourage smuggling or organized crime. Any case, that is fairly like accusing robbery for fat wallets. Smuggling is as of now wild in the cigarette world as an effect of pricing disparities and contrabands or even its support by cigarette producers. . Luk Joossens and Rob Cunningham have indicated how cigarette makers have utilized sneaking to undermine syndications or addition, passage into new markets or dodges taxation. 17 ,18 And demand for contraband to reduce, once the addicted conquer their habit—a circumstance altogether different from disallowance of liquor, where drinking was a more recreational medication. Also, obviously, even a restriction on the offer of cigarettes won't wipe out all smoking—nor ought to that be our objective, since individuals ought to still be allowed to develop their own particular for personal use. Ownership ought not be criminalized; the objection promised to just be a prohibition on deals. Authorization, along these lines, ought to be a minor matter, as is legitimate in a liberal society. And he added that Cigarette smoking itself, however, is less a statement of opportunity than the burglary of it. Thus, as long as people or the government permit the organizations to give themselves a role as protectors of freedom, the table is unjustifiably tilted. People need to perceive that smoking bargains opportunity, and that resigning cigarettes would broaden human

Open Document