Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Significance of leadership
Significance of leadership
The importance of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Significance of leadership
Why Aren’t They Listening – Situational Leadership Explored
Jim Anderson developed a 6 week training program on listening and communication skills to improve management at a large pharmaceutical company (Northouse, 2013). Jim decided to train the middle level managers from research and development first. The managers are highly skilled, but skeptical of the value of the seminar. After the third week, Jim begins to notice problems. Attendance has dropped and the attendees are frequently late or leave early. Jim is unsure how to turn the problem around.
The Situational Leadership II Model
Blanchard, Zigarmi, and Zigarmi (1985) developed a leadership model using four leadership styles and four levels of subordinate development. According to their model, the leadership style should match the development level of the subordinates. The S1 style of leadership is directive, with very few supportive qualities and is used with D1 subordinates. These are subordinates with few skills but a high level of enthusiasm. They are frequently new employees.
The S2 style can be considered a ...
Lashinger et al highlights the need for communication within leadership as effective communication is essential to influence change and motivate others. Emphasising the need for communicating effectively towards all staff members, whilst undergoing change to ensure all staff feel supported and understand the process, allowing implementation to be more successful.
In the context of the Situational model leadership theory, there are three identifiable weaknesses in my leadership practice. These weaknesses represent shortcomings in my role as a leader and might prevent my team from fully executing the organization’s mission. The three weaknesses are:
Situational leadership is a theory which was designed in 1969 by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard. The “contingency theories of leadership” states that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent on their behaviours in relation to different situational factors. Thus, situational leadership theory, relates to how a leader 's effectiveness is depend on their ability to adjust their leadership behaviour to the required level of the “followers” capability or if the situation is modified.
Jim, the training specialist for a large pharmaceutical company is conducting a six-week managerial training session for middle level managers on effective listening and communication skills. Jim is using a supporting approach (S3) for his manager training sessions. The supporting approach in Situational Leadership (SL II) provides low direction and high supportive behaviors. Jim facilitated the training sessions with supportive behaviors such as frequent breaks where he participated and encouraged socialization. Jim did not have an attendance policy in place for the training sessions, and noted as the class progressed attendance suffered with tardiness and leaving early occurring frequently. The supportive
After completing the “Leadership Style Questionnaire” and analyzing my results, I have learned what my preferred leadership style is and how that influences how I lead and may be perceived from members of the group. From the results attained from the questionnaire, my preferred style of leadership is directing. This type of leadership style is best for individuals who have a low competency and high commitment level. These types of leaders are highly focused on tasks and less focused on relationships. They make decisions without consulting with the group and communicate without regarding the group’s concerns or suggestions. This type of leader also supervises the followers intently. They are very successful in creating objectives for each follower and the group as a whole to guide the group in reaching a certain goal.
The leadership model that is being chosen in this paper is the Theory X and Theory Y Leadership model and how to compare the two management style of each employee described in this paper. According to the Business Balls (n.d.), the Theory X manager is a person who is authoritarian and maintains a repressive style while showing characteristics of tight control and no development. They explain a Theory Y manager as a person who wants to have a high achievement, empower their employees, and giving their employees great responsibilities that they known that the person can handle.
The author guided up readers by matching appropriate leadership style with each development level by summing four developments models with four leadership styles as
The original model displayed four styles of leadership that were arranged on a grid according to how each style measured in terms of "relationship behavior" (x axis) and "task behavior" (y axis). (B 25) These four styles were labeled as, S1: Telling, S2: Selling, S3: Participating, and S4: Delegating (B 25). Although many found this model to be effective, others found terms utilized by the authors to be confusing. Therefore, Hersey and Blanchard introduced the SLII model to offer clarity and understanding to managers looking to employ the situational leadership model within their
For example, under this theory the leader would employ High Directive/High Support leadership behaviors to the Disillusioned Learner. Ideally, the leader helps the followers as they progress through the stages to achieve the Self-Reliant Achiever/Delegating level. While I do not necessarily fully subscribe to the theory, it does seem to have merit and I do believe that it is important for an effective leader to have the capability and flexibility to adapt his or her style to the needs of the followers in order to encourage everyone’s success. I also believe that an effective leader plays a significant role in promoting and molding individuals’ readiness as it relates to motivation and commitment. As such, I developed my leadership assessment with these points in mind. The assessment focuses on 14 attributes that I believe are important not only for a leader to be successful within the parameters of the SLT, but...
It has stood the test of time in the marketplace, it is practical, flexible, and has prescriptive value. It is simple to understand and execute in varies arena. Additionally, there are criticisms that expose the weaknesses of the theory. First, there are few studies to justify the assumptions and propositions outlined in the approach. Second, the models of subordinate’s development levels’ are ambiguous. Third, there is little to no information to explain the theoretical basis for the changes in the developmental levels. Fourth, the prescriptions of the model do not align as it relates to the leader style and the development levels. Fifth, it does not account for the how demographics (education, experience, gender, and age) influence the leader-subordinate prescriptions of the model. Sixth, it does not address the one-to-one versus group leadership in an organizational setting. Lastly, the questionnaires used to accompany the model are developed in a way that does not allow for a fair
Since there is no special or one precise type of leader, numerous leadership styles and theories have surfaced. This is because a different situations require different type of leadership styles. In many occasions, leadership theories help to predict the best leadership style to employ in a particular situation. This essay seeks explain why situational leadership theory is useful and relevant in developing an effective leadership culture. It is this writers hope that it can be used as a how to guide to enable managers to be more successful.
This removes the need to follow a rigid strategy at all times and instead, a leader is more able to make sense of the situation around him or her. The model understands that industries and organisations are different and that even within a team, different people can react differently to tasks. In essence, situational leadership’s strength is how it understands the unique nature of the world.
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.
Matthew R. Fairholm states, “Our leadership perspective defines what we mean when we say "leadership" and shapes how we view successful leadership in ourselves and others.” (Pg. )Therefore, change and modifications of desired behaviors must first stem from leadership, in order to achieve success. Follett does consider the challenges for “old-fashioned employers,” they have a difficult time transitioning and comprehending that training and employee is much different from providing orders. Therefore, these types of employers express their frustration with employees who are unable to complete tasks, when in actuality the employee is at a disadvantaged as they are not trained and new habits were not created and reinforced. Follett affirms that lack of training, is a deficiency in education. Therefore, it is crucial for leaders and employers to develop and plan ahead for modeled behaviors to gain the desired responses. Follett asserts psychology has a significant involvement because depending on the delivery of the order and how it is elicited can be the control of how responses are given
The Situational Theories of leadership explain how leadership style must be tailored to the demands of the task and the qualities of subordinates.