Why Are Pro Athletes Overpaid

798 Words2 Pages

“Someone who tosses a ball shouldn’t earn 700 times as much as someone who saves lives.”(Spector, para 4-5). Numerous individuals hold the opinion that athletes, a person most young people look up to, should receive lower compensation, conversely, I disagree with this notion due to a variety of factors. Professional athletes do not earn a significant amount of money due to their self-imposed challenge to not settle for average, as their organizations generate substantial profits, and the athlete is unable to control the amount of money offered to them. Perhaps the primary reason athletes are not compensated astronomically is that they must devote their full lives to pursuing this goal. In a quote from the article “Are Pro Athletes Overpaid” the writer went …show more content…

An athlete must wait until a sport's specified age, since it is typically no less than 18 years young in some leagues, to be drafted. And they have to put in more work than their peers just to have a 7-year career, they deserve their compensation. Because if they got paid the same as a nurse at $100k a year, they would only make $700,000 in their entire career, meaning that they could not live a comfortable life. Uncomfortable after long days of practice or playing a game, these athletes deserve a place to live that is better than a standard person because of the amount they lay their lives on the line. Equally crucial, the follow-up reason is that the organizations make huge sums and are likely to make the difference. The authors of the text “Are Pro/Athletes Paid Too Much?” explain, “The NFL, for example, made about $15 billion.” (“Are” para 2). The 2019-20 campaign alone made the NFL $15 billion and the impact of lower payouts could be best summed up by “Are Pro Athletes Overpaid”, “Also, think about who'd get the money if the athletes made

Open Document