Who To Blame In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

1226 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethics of frankenstein

The battle of who to blame for a person’s actions is a struggled faced every day in the human society. Society effects every element of a human’s life from birth to death; one’s actions are all be determined by society’s role. Mary Shelly warns readers of the role society plays in their everyday lives and how one can be driven to do inhumane actions due to its role in her book Frankenstein. Where a creature is created and then rejected repeatedly by society causing him to lose any human traits he once had; thus, only causing turmoil for those unfortunate enough to cross his path. In her novel Frankenstein Mary Shelley is attempting to warn readers how society can widely effect ones up bringing; through the role of society rejecting the creatures …show more content…

Frankenstein in is the first person that the creature reaches out to for companionship. When Frankenstein first sees the creature, he describes him as having “one hand was stretched out, seemingly to detain me” (Shelly 59). The creatures one out stretched hand is a symbol of the companionship he is seeking. The creature has just been created and does not know why he is here and just like a child he reaches for whom he believes is his parent. The childlike creature will also be impacted on what Frankenstein will teach him and how he will be treated by his new-found parent. Sadly, in his case Frankenstein runs from his creation and leaves the creature to fended for himself. Frankenstein does this for he fears what he has created and what society will think of his creation. When he hears the creature is murdering and hurting ones he loves he does not tell of his creation in fear that he will be a “mad man” to anyone that listens to his story. It is this fear that causes him to deny the monster his companionship for he wishes to only show society the best of himself rather than his most hidden secret.

Show More
Related

  • Ignorance of Society in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.

    385 Words  | 1 Pages

    Frankenstein and Society Society is inevitable. It will always be there as a pleasure and a burden. Society puts labels on everything as good or bad, rich or poor, normal or aberrant. Although some of these stamps are accurate, most of them are misconceptions. In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley this act of erring by society is extremely evident. One example of this judgment is the way the family is looked upon. They are seen by society as the lower class. They work every day on their garden to make food for meals because they do not have enough money to be able to buy food. They are viewed as poor and unfortunate, but are actually rich in spirit. They are good people. They do not complain with the status quo but enjoy what they have, which is an admirable trait for people in any standing. The old blind man sings songs to the others, plays a musical instrument, and adds a sense of experience and content to the family. The children do their daily work without griping as well. Just because they are looked down upon by society that still does not stop them from enjoying what has been provided for them. Society itself, which is supposed to be good, is actually ignorant. They wrongly treat the monster on the assumption that he actually is a monster. They scorn, attack, and shun the monster just because of his outward appearance. This is not justified by anything except his demeanor. They are also afraid of it because they are afraid of things about which they no nothing. Society also unjustly kills Justine because she is the only person that could have possibly have done such an evil act. They again wrongly label Justine as the killer. They do not look into the facts but instead find a quick and easy answer to the problem.

    Read More

  • Accountability of Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    1514 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although humans have the tendency to set idealistic goals to better future generations, often the results can prove disastrous, even deadly. The tale of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, focuses on the outcome of one man's idealistic motives and desires of dabbling with nature, which result in the creation of horrific creature. Victor Frankenstein was not doomed to failure from his initial desire to overstep the natural bounds of human knowledge. Rather, it was his poor parenting of his progeny that lead to his creation's thirst for the vindication of his unjust life. In his idealism, Victor is blinded, and so the creation accuses him for delivering him into a world where he could not ever be entirely received by the people who inhabit it. Not only failing to foresee his faulty idealism, nearing the end of the tale, he embarks upon a final journey, consciously choosing to pursue his creation in vengeance, while admitting he himself that it may result in his own doom. The creation of an unloved being and the quest for the elixir of life holds Victor Frankenstein more accountable for his own death than the creation himself.

    Read More

  • Essay Comparing King Lear And Frankenstein

    1827 Words  | 4 Pages

    As Frankenstein is enroute to his pursuit of gaining more knowledge, he states, “I wished, as it were, to procrastinate all that related to my feelings of affection until the great object, which swallowed up every habit of my nature, should be completed” (Shelley 41). Frankenstein’s decision in allowing his intellectual ambitions to overpower everything else in his life leads him to be blinded to the dangers of creating life. He isolates himself from his society when creating the monster, letting himself be immersed in his creation while being driven by his passions, allowing nobody to be near him. The fact that he allows this creation of a monster to consume his total being reveals how blinded he is to the immorality of stepping outside the boundaries of science and defying nature. His goal in striving to achieve what wants to in placing man over nature makes him lose his sense of self as all he is focused on is the final product of his creation. He starts to realize his own faults as after he has created the monster, he becomes very ill and states, “The form of the monster on whom I had bestowed existence was forever before my eyes, and I raved incessantly concerning him” (48). His impulsive decision to make the monster leads him to abhorring it as it does not turn out to be what he has expected. Because he chooses to isolate himself in creating the

    Read More

  • Compare What Extent Are Born Good In Frankenstein

    913 Words  | 2 Pages

    He was left by his creator, his father, without a mother or sibling to care for him. He is like a babe, born in innocence unaware of evil around, “half-frightened” and “cold” in a new and unknown environment (72). The Monster finds a small village and is instantly hated. The Monster scares the villagers, “some fled, some attacked” automatically hating the strange being that had come into their midst (75). However, the Monster does nothing against the villagers even though he is seen with giant stature and brute strength. After the village incident the Monster flees and finds a small family living in the wilderness in a small cottage. As he stays near the cottagers for a time he begins to learn that he is indeed alone. He learns the roles of family members and yet he does nothing to provoke them. Even after confronting the bling cottager and being “struck” by the man’s son he does nothing but run into hiding. Only after discovering Victor do we see the Monster show sign of evil traits. After telling his story the first sign of hate the Monster shows is talking to Frankenstein saying “Cursed, cursed, creator!” (99). The Monster begs for a “companion” from his creator, longing for someone to spend his days with in happiness (105). As Frankenstein agrees to the Monster’s terms, the Monster feels some sense of happiness. The happiness is not long-lived as Frankenstein recants his promise and

    Read More

  • The Influence Of Creature In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    840 Words  | 2 Pages

    The creature was created with the intention of goodness and purity but because of this, he wasn’t equipped to deal with the rejection of his creator. After Victor Frankenstein’s death, Robert Walton walks in to see the creature standing over his friend’s lifeless body.

    Read More

  • Victor Frankenstein as the True Monster in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    1500 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout Mary Shelley’s classic novel Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein pursues, with a passion lacking in other aspects of his life, his individual quest for knowledge and glory. He accepts the friendships and affections given him without reciprocating. The "creature," on the other hand, seems willing to return affections, bringing wood and clearing snow for the DeLaceys and desiring the love of others, but is unable to form human attachments. Neither the creature nor Victor fully understands the complex relationships between people and the expectations and responsibilities that accompany any relationship. The two "monsters" in this book, Victor Frankenstein and his creation, are the only characters without strong family ties; the creature because Frankenstein runs from him, and Victor because he runs from his family.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Companionship In Frankenstein

    734 Words  | 2 Pages

    Frankenstein explains that, as the monster sees the being that Frankenstein is creatingThe monster looks at the new creature with a smile because he knows that this thing will eventually become his companion. Once she is created, the monster will finally be able to reach a form of happiness and will no longer have to live in complete solitude. However, when Frankenstein destroys this half-finished creature, the monster exclaims, Frankenstein has extinguished the monster’s hope of companionship, so the monster vows to destroy Frankenstein’s life. He no longer has anything to live for, so the monster’s only motivation in life becomes revenge against his creator. This quote from Shelly’s book shows how much the monster valued companionship and how much all other beings value it to. Frankenstein feels that he has nothing left to live for when the monster kills his loved ones. He explains that while his companions are dead and he is still alive, Frankenstein has no reason to live, because his life is meaningless without his friends and family that were killed by the

    Read More

  • Social and Individual Responsibility in Frankenstein

    1089 Words  | 3 Pages

    Social and Individual Responsibility in Frankenstein Mary Shelly wrote Frankenstein in a time of wonder. The main wonder was whether you could put life back into the dead. Close to the topic of bringing life back into the dead was whether you could create your own being, like selective breeding, but a bit more powerful. Close to where Mary lived, there was a man named Vultair who was experimenting with putting electricity through frogs to see if they could come back to life. With that going on close to her, as well as the fear of a revolution and the pressure on her to think of a ghost story, it is not surprising she thought of a horror story that would still be popular in the 21st Century.

    Read More

  • The Consequences Of Frankenstein In Mary Shelly's Frankenstein

    1740 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein secretly creates a monster without considering the consequences. After the creation of the monster and throughout Victor’s life he and the monster suffer constantly. Because Victor keeps his monster a secret from his family, friends and society, he is alone and miserable. The monster is also alone and miserable because he is shunned by society due to his grotesque appearance.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein Being More Human than Monster

    1332 Words  | 3 Pages

    Society is inevitable. It will always be there as a pleasure and a burden. Society puts labels on everything such as good or bad, rich or poor, normal or aberrant. Although some of these stamps are accurate, most are misconceptions. In Mary Shelley's, Frankenstein, this act of erring by society is extremely evident. Two of the most inaccurate assumptions of society revolve around the central characters, Dr. Frankenstein and the monster. Society's labels for these two extremely different characters are on the exact opposite side of the scale of what they truly are. Dr. Frankenstein is more of a monster while the monster is more humane.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein: Who is the victim?

    385 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Frankenstein, the monster and Victor are both put through many depressing and hurtful situations. I think that the monster was the true victim. He was rejected by everyone he came across from the day he entered life. His creator was never there to teach him right from wrong or responsibility. And also, the monster's soon-to-be wife was killed before his eyes. These agonies are what make the monster more of a victim than Victor Frankenstein does.

    Read More

  • Mary Shelley's Frankenstein - Victor Frankenstein is to Blame

    1030 Words  | 3 Pages

    Can an intense appetency for the pursuit of knowledge result in fatal consequences? In most situations when a strong desire is present consequences are seldom taken into consideration. In the novel, Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein pursues knowledge in an obsessive manner that blinds him to the possible effects. Victor Frankenstein is the primary cause of his creature's desolation. Indeed, Victor Frankenstein is at fault for the creature's isolation and malformation, which causes the creature to feel rejected, lonely, and determined to seek revenge.

    Read More

  • Responsibility In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    1123 Words  | 3 Pages

    Responsibility is the duty to deal with or take care of something that is in your life. Scientists and inventors have a great deal of responsibility for what they create and how it affects the world. It’s up to the scientist rather they to want follow those responsibility. There are many examples where scientist didn’t maintain their creations or technology whether it be in real life , in movies , or in books. One example could be Silent Springs by Rachel Carson a book about a new chemical called DDT or pesticides introduce to people that are in the agricultural industry to get rid crop harmful bugs that was a good out come of DDT, but communities started using this chemical in their homes, on themselves, causing harmful effects to children

    Read More

  • Nature Of Guilt In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, which was published in 1818, is perhaps one of most influential stories in the 20th centuries that explore the elements of morality and ethics; it does so by telling the story of a scientist named Victor Frankenstein who unlocks the secret to creating life and has to bear the consequences following his creation of an artificial being that he abandons later on. This abandonment, along with other events that happened later on in the story, causes the monster to become devoted in destroying his creator. While there are many themes and issues regarding morality and ethics that can be derived from the actions both Frankenstein and the monster have committed in the story, one of the themes that will be discussed in this paper is the nature of guilt in the context

    Read More

  • The Responsibility Of The Monster In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    652 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Frankenstein, Victor went from excited to low. The reason of that is the monster that he created. He had a passion that he wanted to create a person that better than human being. He should be smarter and stronger. Victor tried to work hard to approach the goal and spent a lot of time on that.

    Read More

More about Who To Blame In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Open Document