Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The suez canal from past to present day
The suez canal from past to present day
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
With grenades and assault rifles, the parade of crossing the Suez Canal was ruined and Anwar Sadat had died in the midst of the commotion. On October 6, 1981, Egyptian president Anwar Sadat was participating in the 8th annual crossing of the Suez canal in Egypt. Unknown to everyone else, a group of assassins were posing as soldiers in the parade. Not only did one member try to kill Anwar Sadat with a grenade under his hat, but when that failed, all of the assassins came out with assault rifles and killing Anwar Sadat as well as harming others (Engel 1). But did Sadat get what was coming to him? Anwar Sadat's assignation was not justified due to his incredible determination, his true involvement, and his foreign policies. The first reason
his assassination was not justified was his determination in his ideas. Some people, however, would say his determination was a justification for his assassination. When Sadat was in school, he was strongly against the British, especially the ones living in Egypt at that time. In 1939, he entered Signal Corps, where he plotted directly against the British. This is what lead to him going to jail for the first time (Encyclopedia of World Biography 1) . He even attempted to escape put was put back in a second time. However, this is what filled him with determination. When he was in jail for the second time, jail took its toll on him. While he was in jail, he taught himself English and French, and when he got out, he got a job in business and never again associated with his old group (Jewish Virtual Library 1). Really, him being in jail is what caused him to change into the determined man who did not disserve to be assassinated. The next reason Anwar Sadat's assassination was not justified was because of the distance he would go to for change. On March 26, 1979, he met with Prime Minister Begin to sign a peace treaty in the White House. There were many snags along the way, but Sadat would not stop until it was done (Pace 3). Anwar Sadat claimed 11 days claimed 11 days before his trip to Jerusalem, that he would go "to the ends of the earth," and even the Israeli Parliament to stand for peace (Pace 2). This truly shows how passionate Sadat was for his cause. Speaking of which, his cause was the main reason his assassination was unjustified. Sadat's assassination was not justified because of his peace making foreign policies. Anwar originally worked with the Soviet Union to help confront Israel. It was later he realized they did not give him adequate support and expelled them. When he first started his presidency was when he began his peaceful introduction (Gregersen 1). He got rid of an entire partnership due to them not being as peaceful as him. He also was recognized for this peaceful demeanor. In the year 1978, Anwar Sadat won the Nobel Peace Prize alongside Menachen Begin for his negotiation tactics and treaty with Israel (Nobel Prize 1-2). He was so committed to being peaceful, that he signed a peace treaty with Israel and got a Nobel Prize for it. This is the biggest reason his assassination was not justified. In conclusion, due to his dedication to his ideas, the ends he would go to for those ideas, and the peacemaking ideas he stood for, it is obvious that Anwar Sadat's assassination was not warranted. Even though in his early life, he did not stand for peace, he thought about his actions and strived to fix his mistakes. He became president of Egypt and showed the country that peace was possible and within reach. He stated himself that he would go any distance to find the peace he was looking for. That had no reason to prematurely end and shows why his assassination was unjustified.
March 30, 1981 was a peaceful day. President Ronald Reagan was walking outside enjoying the fresh air when suddenly shots were fired. Six shots were fired in total, but only one shot hit Reagan due to a bullet that ricocheted. Luckily, Reagan was hit in the abdomen; therefore, he survived. The “mastermind” behind the attempted assassination was a man named John Hinckley. Hinckley believed by going through with this assassination it would be a romantic scenario for himself to confess his undying love for the actress Jodie Foster. Before long it was time for the Hinckley trial and after hearing his side of the story, the jury came to the conclusion that he was crazy. Hinckley was later found not guilty by reason of insanity and admitted to
For decades, U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East had depended on a friendly government in Iran. The newly appointed leader, the shah of Iran, began Westernizing the country and taking away power from the Ayatollah, powerful religious leaders. The United States poured millions of dollars into Iran’s economy and the shah’s armed forces, overlooking the rampant corruption in government and well-organized opposition. By early 1979, the Ayatollah had murdered the Shah and taken back power of the government. A group of students who took the American embassy hostage on November 4th, 1979, turned the embassy over to the religious leaders. Carter knew he must take action in order to regain the American embassy and the hostages, but with all of the military cutbacks, the rescue attempt was a complete failure and embarrassment. It took the United States 444 days to rescue the hostages. This was the final straw for many Americans, and enough to push them to the “right” side of the political spectrum, Republican.
In 1976, the US Senate ordered a fresh inquiry into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, who was murdered in 1963 during a motorcade in Dallas, Texas while campaigning for re-election. People who had been involved in the original Warren Commission investigations were asked to make fresh statements. The FBI and the CIA were persuaded to release more of their documents on Oswald. New lines of inquiry were opened and individuals who had not previously given evidence were persuaded to come forward. Most important of all, pieces of evidence such as photos and sound recordings were subjected to scientific analysis using the most up-to-date methods and equipment. The House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) completed their investigation in 1979 and they finally came to a discrete verdict that Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at Kennedy, one of which killed the president. A fourth shot was fired from the grassy knoll, which was contradictory to the statement printed by the Warren Commission 16 years earlier. They concluded that John Kennedy was assassinated as the result of a conspiracy.
There were three known attempts on taking JFK?s life in the fall of 1963. In late October, Thomas Arthur Vallee was arrested by the secret service in Chicago days before a scheduled visit by Kennedy. Vallee was discovered to have an M-1 rifle, a handgun, and three thousand rounds of ammunition. Days later, the Secret Service received another threat: Kennedy would b...
Only two weeks later Hussein held a speech, where he accused the neighbor, Kuwait, for draining oil from the Ar-Rumaila oil fields, this was an oil field located along the border, and was a part of both countries. He accused Saudi Arabia and Kuwait for conspiring to keep the prices of oil low to pamper the western oil-buying nations. In addition to Hussein’s speech, the Iraqi troops had already started to gather along the border of Kuwait, ready to invade. President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt was alarmed by this, and started negotiations between the two parts to try to avoid nasty things to happen, and to keep the US from getting involved, but after only two hours, he had to give up, and on August 2 1990, he ordered the invas...
However, this attack on the commander and launch sites came as an immediate response to heavy Palestinian rocket fire over the previous weeks and prevention of other “Palestinian factions from building up their arsenals further. In a statement made by the Israeli Defense Force spokesman, he justifies the assassination of Ahmed Jabari stating “The first aim of this operation is to br...
On November 22, 1963, at 12:30 in the afternoon, President John F. Kennedy was shot at and killed while participating in a motorcade in Dallas, Texas. The most important question that arises from this incident is ‘Who killed President John F. Kennedy?’ This is an issue which has been debated by scholars, The Government, and even common people alike. Many people seem to feel that it was a conspiracy, some large cover-up within a cover-up.
...d took control of the Gaza Strip once again. Anwar el-Sadat then became president after Gamal Abdel Nasser died in 1970. In an effort to take control of the Sinai Peninsula, Anwar el-Sadat attacked the Israelis. After a cease-fire, the United Nation’s troops then returned to keep things peaceful. Israel then later withdrew and was only allowed to use it for non-military purposes. In 1978 a peace treaty was established between Egypt and Israel which influenced more peace in the Middle East. Although a formal treaty was signed in 1979. In 1981 Sadat was assassinated and Mohamed Hosni Mubarak followed him in presidency. The Sinai Peninsula was then returned to Egypt in 1982 after the Israeli troops withdrew from the region. Mubarak embraced Sadat’s policies and managed to climb to the top and be once again making Egypt known as one of the leaders of the Arab world.
When the topic comes to presidential assassins, most people will not use the word amusing and assassins in the same sentence; however; Dan Danbom, a reporter for the Rocky Mountain News, proved otherwise and stated that Vowell has succeeded in creating a “humorous” historical context by writing “I can confidently say that Sarah Vowel’s Assassination Vacation is the most amusing book you’ll read this year about presidential assassinations” (Danbom). Sarah Vowel’s purpose of Assassination Vacation is to allow readers to have a look at both sides of history to shed light on the assassins, to reanimate moments lost to history, and to make her book more interesting by using her unique style of writing; although she fails miserably by adding in too much humor and too many personal opinions, she was successful by examining the motive of the assassins, giving analysis to allow readers to look at past and present events, and by using her interesting style of writing to engage readers to continue reading the story.
Since November 23, 1963, the day after President John Fitzgerald Kennedy was assassinated, there have been speculations as to the happenings of November 22, 1963. Along with the Warren Commission, there are hundreds of conspiracies and theories attempting to explain the assassination of Kennedy. Many people agree with the Warren Commission in that Lee Harvey Oswald acted as the lone gunman, while others maintain that another gunman was involved. Because of extensive evidence, I believe that Oswald did not act alone on November 22, 1963 in the assassination of Kennedy. The additional gunman was strategically placed in the grassy knoll area, in order to shoot at Kennedy from a frontal view (Rubinstein 4).
The structure of Egyptian politics and state administration was also redefined during Ali’s rule. As the go...
In July 1952, the Egyptian government, headed by King Farouk, was overthrown in a bloodless coup led by the Free Officers, soon to be known as the Egyptian Revolutionary Command Council (RCC). The revolution was ostensibly led by Muhammad Naguib but it was clear that he was a mere figurehead and in a little over two years, Gamal Abdel Nasser would assume the Presidency. Although the goals of the RCC were somewhat unclear at the start, Nasser would embark on a policy of creating an independent Egypt free from internal and external domination. It was the latter goal that would set Nasser on a collision course with the West, initially Great Britain and to a lesser extent France, but eventually the United States. As such, Nasser’s commitment to autonomy would make him a hero to many in the Arab World and a villain to the West. Accordingly, for the next sixteen years Nasser and the United States would forge a strained relationship that at times bordered on mutual hostility and on other occasions, would stop just short of friendship based on pragmatic considerations by each side. As such, a detailed study is in order of the relationship between the RCC and the United States beginning with the Egyptian Revolution and ending with Nasser’s death in 1970. Ultimately, one can conclude that each side sought to exploit the other based upon outside considerations pertaining to Arab public opinion and a fear of communism.
A) After Dexter Scott King heard Ray’s side to the story he said’ “Having met with James Earl Ray, I believe and my family believes this man is innocent”
“Egypt’s Revolution was the continuation of a ‘domino effect’ that started from suicide of a vegetable vendor, who set himself on fire. The slap’s echo on his face trembled all dictators’ castles in region. The suicide
Iran has both historic and current legitimate reasons to distrust the United States. In 1953, Muhammad Mossadegh, the democratically elected leader of Iran, was overthrown in a coup d’etat, codenamed Operation Ajax by the CIA. Although Operation Ajax was at first a failure, American spy Kermit Roosevelt ignored a telegram from the CIA to call off the coup. Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian analyzes the result of his decision, “the next day, on August 19, 1953, with the aid of “rented” crowds widely believed to have to have been arranged with CIA assistance, the coup succeeded. Iran’s nationalist hero was jailed, [and] the monarchy [was] restored under the Western-friendly shah”. Although relations between the Iranian government and the United States