Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How do I assess myself about writing skills
Getting good writing
Speach on analytical essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The concepts of weakness, courage, and truth all play significant roles in Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, because characters inside the story represent them. The definitions of weak, courage, and truth are all different for each person, however within the story, each was defined. What is the definition of weakness? Is it not being able to protect the ones you hold dear? Is it being pressured into giving up something? Or is it something more than those? John Proctor, a man of honor who kept his name clean, was weak, and because of his weakness many people died including himself, and those that he cared about. He was not physically weak, but mentally. If only Proctor had the guts to be able to tell the court what really happened, then so …show more content…
many innocent people would not have to die. He could have saved his family, his friends, and the people that he cared about, but because of his weakness, they all died.
Weakness in my opinion is a sin. Only the strong survive in this world, and the weak ones will eventually die off. Of course, Proctor was not the only person that was weak, Elizabeth Proctor was also weak. She did not have the courage to tell the court what really happened, she did not resist when the arrest warrant came for her, and she also did not have the guts to tell John what she really thought. In fact, the whole entire town was weak. The Civilians are weak because they are afraid of the witches, which they never saw might I add. The townsfolk could not serve their own problems so they had to call in someone else, which is a sign of weakness. The girls that were going along with Abigail were also weak. They got on the bandwagon in order to save themselves, which is smart, but still weak. If they all banded together and took on …show more content…
Abigail, what would they need to be scared off? Reverend Parris is also another example of weakness. He is afraid of being killed, as any man should, but he was so scared, he did not dare tell the “whole” truth to Danforth. Each person in Salem is weak, except for Abigail, she was not weak. When a person is courageous, they gain, “strength in the face of pain or grief” (Google).
Not everyone can be courageous, but the few that are, are either dead or alive. Giles Corey is a fine example of someone who is courageous. Not willing to give up the name of the one that said Thomas Putnam was a bad man, challenging the court in order to get his wife back, and finally dying while still holding on to his beliefs, not many can accomplish what this person has done. To not turn in the name of the person that is saying Putnam is a bad man is already going against the court, but would a normal person be able to keep up his facade even though they know they will die? Not many people can say, “more weight,” (Corey) in the face of death. And certainly not many are able to overcome the shadows of death and still hold on to their beliefs. Giles Corey is truly a courageous person, but know that he is not the only one. Others included Francis Nurse who also went against the court and even, John
Proctor. There was no truth in Salem during the witch trials, because each person was telling lies. Abigail can be described as cunning and manipulative which got her this far, but there is without a doubt, that there is no truth in her. If people did not jump to conclusions and investigated the “true” reason why things happen then, people would not be hanged. Nobody in this story represented the work “Truth”. Even though they are all followers of God, none of them spoke the truth. Even Rebecca Nurse is no exception, the reason that she was caught was because of her killing babies during childbirth, but did she say the number of people that she successfully delivered? Ann Putnam lost seven babies but she blamed it all on someone else, however we only drew that out of context. Why did she not say her lifestyle before she had the babies? What if that is the reason why she cannot have babies? Rebecca Nurse should have said what she thought and not try to comfort other people. Parris spoke lies in order to stay a Reverend, and that eventually cost the many lives of people. Weakness, courage, truth all defined the little town of Salem. And it was those things that lead to the death of so many people. However, this does not mean those things are a bad thing. Without weakness you cannot get stronger, without courage it is not possible to face through adversity, and without truth, people would only know lies. They all played a role in The Crucible and that is why the book was so great.
‘The Crucible’ is a great example of morally ambiguous characters. A plethora of characters with blurry ethics exist within the world of ‘The Crucible’, this makes it difficult to distinguish who is truly good and who is evil. Arthur Miller has a fantastic approach to how he displays his characters and their moral standpoints. Adultery, lying, and even the suspicion of witchcraft, within the community brings out the worst in the townspeople. John Proctor is an example of how thin the lines are drawn between a complete saint and a damned sinner.
The Crucible by Arthur Miller shows how authority is a characteristic that can easily become a problem throughout a society. Many subjects were addressed in The Crucible such as guilt, hypocrisy, justice, hysteria, and courage. However, the most important subject throughout the play would be the nature of authority. There is a fine line between the concept of having authority and having power. In the book, the authority weakened and led to the antagonist Abigail Williams leading the law as opposed to the law leading Abigail Williams.
Despite these good qualities, John Proctor had many flaws as well. Lust was a constant struggle for Proctor in many forms. For instance, when Abigail was working for him and his wife, he lusted after her and committed adultery by having an affair. Afterwards, Proctor was extremely repentant and stopped seeing her. “Abby, you’ll put it out of mind. I’ll not be comin’ for you more” (Miller 21). This essentially lead to his demise because of the affair, Abigail became infatuated over Proctor to the point where she went into the woods with her friends and Tituba and practiced “witchcraft” to kill Proctor’s wife. “You drank a charm to kill John Proctor’s wife!” (Miller18). When the girls were caught and the whole “witch” hysteria broke out, people were getting accused and executed, including Proctor, who wouldn’t confess to witchcraft and died because of it. If Proctor never lusted after Abigail and had an affair with her in the first place, accusations of “witchcraft” would have never happened and his death. Throughout the book unlike many other characters, Proctor never accepted the girl's story about witchcraft to be true. He on the other hand knew
Miller, Arthur. The. Why I Wrote The Crucible. Elements of Literature: Fifth Course. Eds.
A crucible refers to a harsh test, and in The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, each person is challenged in a severe test of his or her character or morals. Many more people fail than pass, but three notable characters stand out. Reverend John Hale, Elizabeth Proctor, and John Proctor all significantly change over the course of the play.
Arthur Miller’s political allegory of McCarthyism, in the form of The Crucible, has been adapted into a faithful companion to the play that is able to incorporate the emotions and atmosphere that may not have been available to some in the play. Miller’s screenplay is very faithful to the book, having many of the same lines and situations the character in the play experience. Because of this, we are able to make an active connection to the play, thus expanding our understanding of the play. Lead by Daniel Day-Lewis, The Crucible’s plot is portrayed by a solid cast, who, for the most part, are able to engross the viewer into the story. The film contains many captivating scenes that exemplify hysteria meant to be depicted in the play, that demands the viewers attention while also immersing them in emotions. The film adaptation of The Crucible is a well produced version of the play that not only serves as a companion to the play, but an entertaining and though provoking experience.
When people are put in tense and difficult situations, they lose control. John and Elizabeth Proctor, and Mary warren, all exhibit this throughput the play. John exhibits courage, in the sense that he found the strength to keep his name and lose his life rather than keep sinning and lie. Mary Warren displays weakness when she falls to Abby once again, in the end, instead of sticking to her story and assisting John, in freeing Elizabeth. Elizabeth illustrated how difficult it was to tell the truth in life or death situations. All three of these characters, and their traits, represent what “The Crucible,” is about, courage, weakness, and
Throughout the drama, The Crucible, the characters are faced with chilling choices as they maneuver through a world that has lost its moral compass. The crucibles, the serious tests, of their dearly held values put them in the position of having to figure out what is right and true in a world turned upside down. The value of truth is tested when lies are rewarded and truth brings suffering, shame and the scaffold of the gallows. The value of justice is challenged by a system that comes to be based on coerced confessions, unsubstantiated charges and self-serving political scheming. The value of love, be it of husband and wife or of friends and community, is put to the test where true love is exemplified by fatal choices.
Life as a human is dictated by an inborn hunger or purpose, and people, in general, will act on this hunger for their own personal gain in their individual ways. This hunger, be it for wealth, land, love, power, revenge, or pride, can, and will be the undoing or failing of all mankind as Miller so clearly points out in his play 'The Crucible';. This essay will explore the motives of characters within the play and even the motives of Arthur Miller himself and therefore show how conflict stems from certain recognisable human failings including those mentioned above, fear, and hysteria.
The issues of power, that Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, portrays are concerned with, who has the power, the shifts of power that take place and how power can consume people and try to abuse it, for either vengeance, jealously, material gain or sexual desire.
The title of the play, The Crucible by Arthur Miller is appropriate because it refers to various themes that are critically explored throughout the play. A crucible by definition, is a metal or ceramic container or pot in which substances or objects may be melted in. Also, a second definition of a crucible is severe tests or trials. Both these definitions can be applied to the title, The Crucible. The title has a metaphorical meaning which connects it to the play’s conflicts. Some conflicts that are in the play is, witchcraft, hysteria, theocracy, land disputes, blackmailing, and the dangers of scapegoating.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is a play that discusses many issues and spurs contemplation within the reader. While reading this play, because of the controversy of many issues detailed within, it is difficult for one not to take a look at one’s own morals and determine what one would do if placed in a similar situation. The key issues discussed within this play, the effects of hysteria, marital betrayal, and the murderous powers of lies, are portrayed intriguingly and effectively. The lessons that can be learned from The Crucible are still quite applicable today.
The Crucible by Arthur Miller raises many thought provoking issues throughout the play, including the importance of personal integrity, injustice in society and the rights of the community versus the rights of the individual.
Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.
In this world some people live and die for pride, others try their whole lives to understand it, and there are others who cowardize from it as well. John Procter's actions throughout the play are motivated by his strong sense of pride that he has on himself. In the book The Crucible by Arthur Miller, many of the characters learn things about themselves as well as the others. Some of the characters were John Procter, Reverend Parris and the judge, Danforth. Author Miller develops the characters in the play to introduce the themes of pride and self-centeredness that took a strong part in throughout the book in every step of the way.