Who Is Rochester Annotated In Jane Eyre

511 Words2 Pages

Rochester is a mimic of the occident despite being a member of the society. He is ‘almost the same’ but patriarchal structures meant that the younger son would not gain as much as the first born, and so he is victimized by his difference, just as Antoinette is. Sylvie Maurel believes that by ‘marrying Antoinette, Rochester is by no means creating his own story. As a penniless younger son, he is pressurized by his family into an arranged marriage with a presumably wealthy creole.’ Unlike Annette’s second husband, Mr. Mason, Rochester does not travel to Jamaica in order to ‘make money [off old estates] as they all do’ (p. 13), he does so to please his father. This is shown when he muses about writing a letter to his father,
Dear father, the thirty thousand pounds have been paid to me without …show more content…

[…] I will never be a disgrace to you or to my dear brother the son you love. No begging letters, no mean requests. None of the furtive shabby manoeuvres of a younger son. I have sold my soul or you have sold it’. (p. 42)
He only wants the money in order to not ‘disgrace’ his father or brother, and believes he has ‘sold [his] soul’ to please them. Here he is similar to Antoinette as despite being orphans by the end of the novel, both are affected by the everlasting influence of the older generation. They are forced to mimic the white colonial marriage. But Rochester is aware that he ‘played the part [he] was expected to play’, and questions how no one noticed that ‘every movement [he] made was an effort of will’ (p. 46). He is pleading for someone to discover his mimicry, but is trapped by it. Although Rochester visibly does not approve the treatment of the younger son in the patriarchal and imperialist regime, and is ‘almost the same, but not quite’, he also does not use his difference to undermine the authority. Bhabha was analysing the mimicry of colonised subjects, but Rochester’s mimicry provides questions as to whether the

Open Document