Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Still alice analysis
Character development introduction
An essay on character development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Still alice analysis
It’s All Your Fault!
How could you live your life knowing you were responsible for a sweet, old man’s death? In the book The Pigman by Paul Zindel, John and Bobo are the two assassins responsible for Mr. Pignati’s tragic death. Although there are many other factors including the hospital letting Mr. Pignati out early, Lorraine, Conchetta, and others, John and Bobo still . The inferior, isolated old man didn’t deserve to be taken advantage of, but he was. Others may disagree; however, don’t worry, there’s proof!
Now let's talk about John… John Conlan is irresponsible, immature, and extremely careless. He is the main reason The Pigman is no longer with us. In the book, John said, “Everything that happened from then on Lorraine blames me for, and maybe she’s right.” John knows he was the reason Mr. Pignati’s life ended when it did. The reader most likely understands that he didn't mean to hurt Mr. Pignati, but he still did. John should have never taken advantage of Mr. Pignati in the first place by asking for a donation. As the story went on, John got worse. However, John didn’t do it alone, there was one more person who is responsible for Mr. Pignati’s death.
…show more content…
As Mr. Pignati said, “I want you to meet Bobo. My best friend.” This proves how much the chimp meant to him. When everything else wasn’t working out for Mr. Pignati, Bobo was always there to cheer him up. Until the day when he needed him most. John and Lorraine took the old man to the zoo to see Bobo, but he wasn’t there. As soon as Mr. Pignati heard the news, he literally dropped dead. Yes, Bobo is a chimp and he can’t really help it that it was his time to go, but he was such a big part of Mr. Pignati’s
John is really stubborn when it comes to living up to his name to the point of death. John has no
The death of Johnny is a noble death. He dies from saving children and also Ponyboy. His death means something. Near the end of the story, he is still looking out for Ponyboy, telling him to “‘stay gold’”(148) and writing him the letter. Ponyboy says “Johnny was right. He died gallantly” (154). He dies still thinking of other people, he dies a hero. Conversely, Dally dies selfishly and only looking out for himself. He dies under the street lamp, happy with how things turn out, while Johnny dies in a bed, scared and wishing he had done more. Ponyboy says ¨Dally didn't die a hero. He died violent and young and desperate¨ (154). He does not die peacefully like Johnny, he dies a harsh death, just because he breaks for not being a hero like Johnny. Ponyboy and the rest of the gang all know he would someday die like this. Ponyboy went on to saying ¨two friends of mine had died that night, one a hero, the other a hoodlum¨ (154). Their death shows a clear difference between Johnny and
John, as mentioned in the last paragraph, is also at fault when it comes to the lack of communication in his relationship with Ann. He’s described by Ann as slow and not good with conversation. He’s a very work driven man, and it makes it difficult for him to sit with Ann and have a nice, relaxed conversation. Ultimately, because he is a farmer, he doesn’t have many chances to have a nice long talk with his wife, so the lack of communication is not solely Ann’s fault. John, after discovering that his wife has cheated on him after 7 years of marriage, doesn’t confront her. He doesn’t attempt to speak with her at all; instead he decides that her happiness is more important, and it’s implied that he walks back out into the snowstorm and kills himself. Obviously, John’s death could have been avoided if he had actually said something to Ann before committing suicide. However, this can be considered as a very crucial moment of the story, as it proves why a lack of communication is important in a relationship, though to a very extreme measure. Because Ann, and John especially, didn’t have experience sharing their thoughts when they were unhappy, John didn’t have the ability to speak his mind when he needed to the most. They could have potentially talked about it and found a result that wouldn’t have ended in John’s death, even if it hadn’t been the happiest of endings. However, because there was very little communication in their relationship, the two couldn’t find a way to resolve their problems, and it ended in John committing
In the final act, John went crazy after he signed a contract admitting he was a witch. He claimed the only thing he had left besides his family was his name and it's all he wanted to keep. Soon he was pushed over the edge and ripped up the paper, taking his pride away with him. Rebecca Nurse and other people from the village made John feel ashamed for signing the paper, this made a major impact on his final decision also. John was killed with his “good name”.
Many times in a story what the main characters say can reflect their personality and lifestyle. This is shown effectively in the memorial epic by Paul Zindel, The Pigman. Throughout this stunningly truthful story, John and Lorraine consistently say things that show just what type of people they are.
John's decision to commit suicide was the right thing to do to make Ann happy. John thought that killing himself would make it easier for her to stay with Steven, who he thinks that she loves. John made a decision about his own life so he has the right to choose to kill himself. He also just wants Ann to be happy. He is "naively proud of Ann. He had bewildered by it once, her caring for a dull-witted fellow like him: then assured al last of her affection he had relaxed against it gratefully, unsuspecting it might ever be less constant than his own." (Pg.49) In John's mind he was making the right decision, so he was free to make it.
In conclusion, we can see that there were various “bad guys” throughout this movie. In the minds of these “bad guys”, the image of what was truly right and wrong was clouded by policies and money. Without John’s actions these “bad guy” characters may have let an innocent eight year old boy die, due to pieces of paper and coins. On a positive note; more or less of these “bad guys” did end up doing the right thing at the end of the movie. This movie shows the viewers that though there are “bad guys” in the world with selfish and uncivil actions, there is potentially hope for them to correct themselves, if they are shown what is truly right and just.
They started out not very trusting Mr.Pignati, but then they found out he wasn’t such a bad guy. They started to visit him more often and became good friends with him. They went shopping and to the zoo and played memory games with each other. They went roller balding together and Mr.
...ssion and intrusiveness. John’s lack of having an open mind to his wife’s thoughts and opinions and his constant childish like treatment of his wife somehow emphasizes this point, although, this may not have been his intention. The narrator felt strongly that her thoughts and feelings were being disregarded and ignored as stated by the narrator “John does not know how much I really suffer. He knows there is no reason to suffer, and that satisfies him” (Gilman 115), and she shows her despise of her husband giving extra care to what he considers more important cases over his wife’s case with a sarcastic notion “I am glad my case is not serious!” (Gilman 115). It is very doubtful that John is the villain of the story, his good intentions towards doing everything practical and possible to help his wife gain her strength and wellbeing is clear throughout the story.
The reason of John’s death was the mock from the people in the world. John can not win the sick world and the crazy people.
And where there is no legal punishment for his father’s death, he must stoop, driven by the universal wrong, and “being thus be-netted round with villainies”, to revenge. He must share the corruption of others in spite of his nobility, and recognize in himself the common features, "we are arrant knaves all." (53)
In the short story “Killings,” by Andre Dubus, revenge, loss, and consequences are explored. Richard Strout, a man of little to no morality, committed a crime of passion, which I do not think is a justifiable crime, since he murdered a man who was in a relationship with his wife that he is separated from. Strout is an impatient and violent man with no boundaries. This is evident since he did kill Frank in front of his children and his estranged wife.
In the end we find out that John had not raped and killed the two little girls he was found with, but instead he had happened upon them and tried to bring them back to life; only it was too late. Seeing the fantastical nature of the situation the guards who knew the truth were unable to free John of the charges he was facing and they had to kill him anyways.
When John sees his dad at the store, his internal conflict develops and this leads to his conflict with Grace. People in relationships tend to get into arguments with each other. It is a very realistic representation of his character. It would be unrealistic if a couple never argues. He accuses her of being a snob and this leads to the argument which is revealed when the narrator says, “They had never talked in this way, and now they were both quickly eager to hurt each other” (4). This illustrates that they were growing as a couple and were opening up to each other about their feelings. John finally lets his inner anger out on Grace and shows that he cares about her opinion on different matters such as how she views people from lower social class (3). John is a hypocrite since he calls Grace a snob when in reality he, himself is a snob because he is embarrassed of his dad’s lower social status. He is assuming that Grace would not like to be associated with him after finding out the truth. This is shown when he asks Grace, “You don 't like the kind of people you bump into here, … he asks recklessly, full of a savage eagerness to hurt her” (3). He is being naive for forcing his anger on Grace and not realizing the reason that is causing it. People tend to make foolish decisions when they are angry; likewise, John is trying to hurt Grace because he thinks he
He takes great pride in his outward appearance. His shoes and hair seem to be the place he takes the most pride in. In BoBo’s own words, “My shoe game is on point!!!” He has days where he styles his hair in a seemingly ridiculous style. He always talks about how he is the perfect borderline between too curly and not curly enough. He puts it into a ponytail of curly and extravagant tangles on occasions. Even though most people’s opinion is his hair looks like a mud pie. He still has so much self confidence that he will continue to style it like that despite public opinion