Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of the Hindi film industry
Influence of the Hindi film industry
Impact of indian cinema
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Native American Humor in Louise Erdrich’s Tracks Humor is a core value of Native American life. It can also be considered a form of survival in some ways, which is why most of their humor can best be defined as survival humor. “As expressed by survivors of tragedy, nonvanishing Native Americans, this humor transcends the void, questions fatalism, and outlasts suffering….At cultural ground zero, it means that Indians are still here, laughing to survive” (Lincoln 45-96). Louise Erdrich’s Tracks exposes this power of humor being able to affect ones experiences through the characters of Nanapush and Fleur. Throughout the book, the Chippewa Indians are caught in conflicts with the “whites”. They attempt to convert their religion to Christianity, …show more content…
change their government, and change their culture. By the end of the novel, the “whites” have appeared to won when Fleur loses her land. Lulu, Fleur’s daughter, gets sent to a government school, and Fleur leaves Eli, Lulu’s father and what we assume to be Fleur’s husband. The characters Nanapush and Margaret end up living together though and are able to keep in touch with Lulu in hopes they will be able to take her in once she graduated. Through this time, Erdrich uses Nanapush to keep the Chippewa Indians having a good spirit. In this novel, Nanapush is known for his jokes and is considered the “trickster”.
He offends the purity of marriage and the religion of Christianity by making remarks such as when he is approached by Father Damien about Margaret and him getting married, he says “I’m having relations with Margaret already…That’s the way we do things.” (Erdrich 123) He emphasized the fact that he has another way of living he doesn’t want to intrude upon. He insults Father Damien when he confesses he stole the wire from his piano. Father Damien becomes frusterated and says “Discord is hateful to God. You have offended His ear,” Nanapush just tells Father Damien “You can have the wire back,” (Erdrich …show more content…
124). He directs most of his jokes (which consist greatly of raucous bantering) at Margaret.
Through loads of boasting of his sexual abilities, he tries to lead her into a romantic relationship with him. While Nanapush describes Margret as “headlong, bossy, scared of nobody and full of vinegar” (Erdrich 47), she described him as an “old man…two wrinkled berries and a twig.” When Margaret comes to Nanapush extremely mad saying “Who learned my Eli to make love standing up!” Nanapush did not respond so Margret would say “Old, man, two wrinkled barriers and a twig.” Nanapush scoffs, “A twig can grow,” and Margret would laugh “Only in the spring,” (Erdrich 48), suggesting that Nanapushes time to grow was over. Through the two’s taunting and teasing, a deep relationship evolved throughout the novel. Along with such situations, Nanapush uses humor in many other parts of the novel to lighten the mood as well as downplay his wrongs in the past. Nanapush recalls his father saying “Because it’s got to do with something a girl can’t resist. The first Nanapush stole fire. You will steal hearts,” (Erdrish 33) and later senses Eli wants to hear about how he had satisfied three wives, he would avoiding the subject by turning to Eli’s sex life “I won’t bite you like the little girls,” (Erdrich 41) he said to Eli. Through this, he was able to take the focus off of the fact he has slept with married
women. Nanapush isn’t the only one we see humor from though. In chapter 6, we see some of Pauline’s action to become close to Christ. Though she doesn’t mean to, her seriousness becomes a big source of humor. Pauline was born one-quarter white, so she has this obsession with becoming “white” in every way possible, most noticeably the religious aspects of the “whites”. Along with going to such lengths to experience Christ’s suffering by simply wearing her shoes on the wrong feet, in one part of the chapter, Pauline says that she “…made a set of underwear from potato sacks…” and when she wore them “…the chafing reminded me of Christ’s sacrifice,” (Erdrich 143). After much dedication, she thinks she is finally able to show it through not bathing. “[God] would rather have a good soul that stank like a cheese then a bad soul fragranced with rose oil and myrrh. My rank aroma was the perfume my soul exuded, devotion’s air,” (Erdrich 153). Everything she does humorously shows how desperate she is to leave her Native American character. For the Chippewa tribe, this humor is essential, providing strength as well as medicine for cultural and spiritual conservation within the tribe. In this novel, humor even challenges fate.
However as Jeanette and her siblings quickly lose their innocence and are pulled into the reality of life, her idolization of her parents, (especially her father) gradually lessens and she comes to terms with their flawed lifestyle. As she begins to lose hope in her parents, she begins describing them in a more negative light. For example, she exposes the intensification of her father's drinking problem. “He staggered off to the bathroom, came back, ordered one for the road, slammed the shot glass down on the bar, and walked to the door. He lost his footing trying to open it and sprawled on the floor. I tried to help him up, but he kept falling over”(page?) This repugnant and embarrassing description of Rex, contrasts how Jeanette tried to showcase his admirable qualities earlier in the story. In the sentence she also no longe...
The book started out with a bloody massacre at Mary Ingles Virginia settlement in 1755. Mary Ingles was pregnant with her third child and twenty-four years of age when the Shawnee Indians came and kidnapped her, her two sons, her sister-in-law, and her neighbor. The journey to the Shawnee village lasted five weeks in the Virginia wilderness, and once the captives arrived at the village they were divided up amongst the Shawnee Indians, leaving Mary alone with no hope but to go home and make a new family with her husband Will Ingles. While in the village of the Shawnee Mary was able to make friends with an elderly Dutch woman who was a captive too, this elderly woman was to be Mary’s companion through the scary wilderness home. Mary and the old Dutch woman were unable to swim but knew that the Ohio River would lead them back home to freedom so they decided to make an escape from the heathen Indians and return home to civilization, not knowing the hardships that would fall on them at the beginning of winter. To start the journey the women had two blankets, one tomahawk, and the clothes that were on their backs, after a week into the trip th...
Professor and poet Deborah A. Miranda, pieces together the past and uncovers and presents us with a story--a Californian story--in her memoir, “Bad Indians.” Her use of the Christian Novena, “Novena to Bad Indians,” illustrates the irony of using the form of her oppressors as a call out for help, not to God, but to her past ancestors. We tend to think of religion as a form of salvation and redemption of our lives here on Earth, in which we bare down and ask for forgiveness. But by challenging this common discourse using theological allegories and satirical terminology, Miranda turns her attention away from a Deity to call the reader out for help. It is crucial to recognize the struggles that the Native community currently face. Californian Indians are often not given recognition for their identity and their heritage, and are also repeatedly stereotyped as abusive, alcoholic, uncivilized, and “freeloaders” of the United States government. Such generalizations root back from European colonization, nevertheless still linger in our contemporary society. Miranda has taken the first step forward in characterizing few of these stereotypes in her Novena, but she’s given her story. Now what are we going to do with ours? It’s up to us to create our
Neil Diamond reveals the truth behind the Native stereotypes and the effects it left on the Natives. He begins by showing how Hollywood generalizes the Natives from the clothing they wore, like feathers
The rhetor for this text is Luther Standing Bear. He was born in 1868 on the Pine Ridge Reservation. He was raised as a Native American until the age on eleven when he was taken to Carlisle Indian Industrial School: an Indian boarding school. After graduating from the boarding school, he returned to his reservation and now realized the terrible conditions under which they were living. Standing Bear was then elected as chief of his tribe and it became his responsibility to induce change (Luther Standing Bear). The boarding schools, like the one he went to, were not a fair place to be. The Native American children were forced to go there and they were not taught how to live as a European American; they were taught low level jobs like how to mop and take out trash. Also, these school were very brutal with punishment and how the kids were treated. In the passage he states, “More than one tragedy has resulted when a young boy or girl has returned home again almost an utter stranger. I have seen these happenings with my own eyes and I know they can cause naught but suffering.” (Standing Bear 276). Standing Bear is fighting for the Indians to be taught by Indians. He does not want their young to lose the culture taught to them from the elders. Standing Bear also states, “The old people do not speak English and never will be English-speaking.” (Standing Bear 276). He is reinforcing the point that he believes that they
Kidnapping colonists during the struggle for land in the early centuries of American history was a strong force influencing the images of Native Americans circulating among the Puritan pioneers. During these centuries, the battles between the natives and the Puritans cost thousands of lives on both sides, and countless stories in the forms of captivity narratives revealed truths and myths about the Native people. Although there were countless pieces of literature and propaganda published in this time period, the actual Indian captivity narratives have been narrowed down to works “that presumably record with some degree of verisimilitude the experiences of non-Indians who were captures by American Indians” (Derounian-Stodoloa, Levernier, 9). Through such a narrative by Mary Rowlandson, who was taken captive by the Wampanoag tribe in 1676, the contemporary writer and poet Louise Erdrich shows another side of history that could not have been expressed by the surviving captives hundreds of years ago. That recreation is her poem, “Captivity,” which uses the inner conflict of the captive woman to express both historical feelings of Native Americans and their place among whites, along with Erdrich’s conflicts within her own life.# Coming from a mixed family, with her mother being part Native American, Erdrich experiences a pull from both her European history and Native American heritage. Through her poem, “Captivity,” Erdrich exposes the inner conflict that is felt by both historical women and herself, such as the conflicting feelings and cultural pulls of the two societies through sharing experiences of removal from their known worlds and returns to the white man’s society.
Although the work is 40 years old, “Custer Died for Your Sins” is still relevant and valuable in explaining the history and problems that Indians face in the United States. Deloria’s book reveals the White view of Indians as false compared to the reality of how Indians are in real life. The forceful intrusion of the U.S. Government and Christian missionaries have had the most oppressing and damaging affect on Indians. There is hope in Delorias words though. He believes that as more tribes become more politically active and capable, they will be able to become more economically independent for future generations. He feels much hope in the 1960’s generation of college age Indians returning to take ownership of their tribes problems and build a better future for their children.
I married George because I thought he was a gentleman, I thought he knew something about breeding, but he wasn’t fit to lick my shoe. He is no more of value than of the ashes of the valley. The pathetic, delusional man; thinking he really can please me with stupid words. ‘I love you Myrtle. I would do anything for you, and you know that’. But we all know that words are not REALLY made of gold, don’t we?
In Louise Erdrich’s “Tracks';, the readers discovers by the second chapter that there are two narrators, Nanapush and Pauline Puyat. This method of having two narrators telling their stories alternately could be at first confusing, especially if the readers hasn’t been briefed about it or hasn’t read a synopsis of it. Traditionally, there is one narrator in the story, but Erdrich does an effective and spectacular job in combining Nanapush and Pauline’s stories. It is so well written that one might question as he or she reads who is the principal character in this story? Being that there are two narrators, is it Nanapush, the first narrator, him being a participant in the story, who tells his story in the “I'; form? Or is it Pauline, the second narrator, who also narrates in the “I'; form? Upon further reading, the motive for both narrators’ stories become more evident, and by the end of the book, it becomes clear that one character is the driving force for both of the narrators’ stories. This central character is Fleur Pillager. She in fact is the protagonist of “Tracks';. Even though she is limited in dialogues, her actions speak more than words itself.
Louise Erdrich’s short story “American horse” is a literary piece written by an author whose works emphasize the American experience for a multitude of different people from a plethora of various ethnic backgrounds. While Erdrich utilizes a full arsenal of literary elements to better convey this particular story to the reader, perhaps the two most prominent are theme and point of view. At first glance this story seems to portray the struggle of a mother who has her son ripped from her arms by government authorities; however, if the reader simply steps back to analyze the larger picture, the theme becomes clear. It is important to understand the backgrounds of both the protagonist and antagonists when analyzing theme of this short story. Albetrine, who is the short story’s protagonist, is a Native American woman who characterizes her son Buddy as “the best thing that has ever happened to me”. The antagonist, are westerners who work on behalf of the United States Government. Given this dynamic, the stage is set for a clash between the two forces. The struggle between these two can be viewed as a microcosm for what has occurred throughout history between Native Americans and Caucasians. With all this in mind, the reader can see that the theme of this piece is the battle of Native Americans to maintain their culture and way of life as their homeland is invaded by Caucasians. In addition to the theme, Erdrich’s usage of the third person limited point of view helps the reader understand the short story from several different perspectives while allowing the story to maintain the ambiguity and mysteriousness that was felt by many Natives Americans as they endured similar struggles. These two literary elements help set an underlying atmos...
The reading “The School Days of an Indian Girl,” by Zitkala-Sa, discusses two main ideas throughout the passage: the infliction of new culture and the segregation of races. These main ideas are addressed in the context of a missionary school for Native American children, in which they are forced to follow the ways of American culture and are segregated against for being of a different race. By encouraging the worship of Jesus and, “...the white man’s Bible,”(40), Quaker missionary school is teaching Native American children to worship Christianity and realize the importance of white culture, but at the same time, the same teachers and nurses will, “...neglect of our physical ills,”(40), and will only choose to care after the white children. Speaking directly to the motive of these missionary schools (to impose white religion and discriminate against Native
At the beginning of the short story Maggie's family is introduced, from her scrappy little brother Jimmie, to her short lived brother Tommie, her alcoholic mentally-abusive mother Mary, and her brutish father. Jimmie's friend Pete is introduced and becomes a mirror image of Jimmie later on in the book. They both are portrayed as Don Juans, the seducers of young women who treat women as objects rather than people. Maggie's father is as short-lived as her brother Tommie. However, he becomes a negative social factor in Maggie's life. Maggie’s mother was an essential symbol of hypocrisy and pessimism throughout the book, from her drinking to her last comment in the book “I'll Forgive Her” (Crane).
With this in mind, the mother, or the narrator of the story describes herself as a big-boned, manly woman with hands so rough from years of physical labor. She is a tough parent, taking the role of both mother and father for her daughters and providing for them. Taking into account that they are a poor family and most of them are uneducated. By her mother’s observation and words she describes Maggie as shy. “Maggie walks chin ...
The relationship between Myrtle and her husband is insincere, loveless, and dead. Myrtles husband George, who is lifeless, poor, and often dirty, owns a garage in the valley of ashes. While George is completely devoted to his wife Myrtle, on the other hand myrtle has lost love for her husband, and desires for a more elegant fast pace life. Myrtle tries to find a way to fix the situation between her and her husband, but instead she takes the easy way out and cheats on her husband with Tom a very rich, prominent, and handsome man who gives her everything that she desires, but he is also a married man.
It is the story of a 17th century attempt to assimilate an Innu child in North America into a French religious order. The odyssey of this young man and the failure of assimilation. Many attempts came throughout the centuries, but not successfully as Anderson states, “Like Pastedechouan's, their education systemically estranged them religiously and culturally from their natal communities, even as racism often precluded their acceptance in the white world they had been groomed to join (Barman et al. 1986; Frank