Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Anti-communist movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Anti-communist movement
In the book Voices of Freedom by Eric Foner, an essay written by Henry Steele Commager argued that the anticommunist movement was the new meaning of loyalty. In the article “Who is Loyal to America” by Henry Steele, he conveyed how the Lavender Scare was a problematic issue to the government since the Lavender Scare was aimed at homosexuals working for the government. Discriminating the homosexuals was very similar to the civil rights reforms because the situation was very similar to the Red Scare at the time. Thus caused the change through feminist movement which stressed equality for everyone. This all intertwines with polices due to the fear of communism. Being “different” from the others raised a great suspicion of being a part of being …show more content…
the communist movement. If you were homosexual, they thought that you are more likely to leak information to communism countries mainly Soviet Union. Following WWII and going into the Cold War, there was a huge problem that loyalty became a form of conformity.
According to Henry Steele, in his essay “Who is Loyal to America”, he states that “What is the new loyalty? It is, above all, conformity” (Foner. 240) This means that if you are not devoted or in a high social standing, then you could be accused of being part of the communist movement. This was a problematic because those who were loyal were placed on top of back burners “who regard public office as a source of private gain. Those who would exalt the military over the civil” (Foner. 242) Henry was very clear about this because those who changed the definition of loyalty was the ones who were doing the opposite. Another problem that Henry stated was “the concept of loyalty as a conformity is a false one. It is narrow and restrictive, denies freedom of thought and of conscience, and is irremediably stained by private and selfish considerations” (Foner, 240). This is the reason why he was arguing because the government are trying to force people to change into a “true” American without any questions. This ideology broke basically all the Amendments that are bound to citizens. Understanding the new “loyalty” is very important because there are many issues that happened such as the Lavender Scare and the Red
Scare. An example of promotion of conformity was the Lavender Scare. During the 1950’s, homosexuals working for the government were persecuted. The reason why homosexuals were prosecuted is because the government thought that being “different” from the society makes you seem like you are from the communist party. This connects to the McCarthyism because the government is making false accusations without any evidence of being “different” to convey that they are a part of the communist party. The government also believed that if you were homosexual, there was a bigger chance of you leaking information to others since (they say) you lack emotional stability and are weak minded. According to the lecture, we discussed about Alger Hiss. He was being a communist spy by Whittaker Chambers. Whittaker was accused of many homosexual affairs which made the government very suspicious and when Hiss and Chambers hits the media, everyone believed that they were communist spies. The government took this issue very seriously, any little thing that could connect you to the communist party, they will accuse you with no questions asked. In the 1950’s and 1960’s, the civil right reforms was a big issue in the government’s perspective. Americans felt much discriminated by the government since they did not conform to the government expectations. The Cold War was a force of change because it was the initial step to desegregation. When the Soviet Union figured out that the United States military were segregated, they could use it to convey to other nations that the United States were not doing what they wanted. If other nations were to see that the United States were not doing what they were encouraging then other nations would go towards communism which is very bad. Another case would be the Brown vs. Education. The Truman Administration was able to give African American students access to prominent white school. Although this was a very risky take, it was the step in making other nations see that the United States is doing what they intend to do. Other nations saw the United States as being “talker” of all nation because before, they saw that the United States doing the opposite of what they intended to do however, when the Truman Administration came into play to desegregate schools and the military, everything started going in the right direction. If the Soviet Union spies found out negative things going around in the Unites States then they will try any way to make the U.S look bad. Same situation with Chambers and Hiss, they were accused of being a part of the communist party and made all the other nations aware the United States is imperfect. The government was trying every way to block out any communist influence.
Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers to the United States, was not a patriot but a mere loyalist to England before the dissolution between England and the colonies occurred. Sheila L. Skemp's The Making of a Patriot explores how Benjamin Franklin tried to stay loyal to the crown while taking interest in the colonies perception and their own representation in Parliament. While Ms. Skemp alludes to Franklin's loyalty, her main illustration is how the attack by Alexander Wedderburn during the Privy Council led to Franklin's disillusionment with the British crown and the greater interest in making the Thirteen Colonies their own nation. Her analysis of Franklin's history in Parliament and what occurred on the night that the council convened proves the change behind Franklin's beliefs and what lead to his involvement in the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution.
In Vicki L. Eaklor’s Queer America, the experiences of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, and transgender people in the years since the 1970s gay liberation movement are described as a time of transformation and growth. The antigay movement, threatened, now more than ever, created numerous challenges and obstacles that are still prevalent today. Many of the important changes made associated with the movement were introduced through queer and queer allied individuals and groups involved in politics. Small victories such as the revision of the anti discrimination statement to include “sexual orientation”, new propositions regarding the Equal Rights Amendment and legalized abortion, were met in turn with growing animosity and resistance from individuals and groups opposed to liberal and
When picking an author that is the “epitome of what it means to be an American,” one author in particular stands out to me every time, and it is an author who is probably not considered by many to be an “American” author. Her name is Phillis Wheatley. Through her writings, Wheatley expresses her patriotism and overall respect for life in America, gaining her recognition by critics and fans alike, and a major spot in the topic of American Literature. Within my essay, I aim to prove how Wheatley deserves the title of being labeled an American, and how she embodies the topic of what it means to be an American.
Recently you have received a letter from Martin Luther King Jr. entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In Dr. King’s letter he illustrates the motives and reasoning for the extremist action of the Civil Rights movement throughout the 1960’s. In the course of Dr. King’s letter to you, he uses rhetorical questioning and logistical reasoning, imagery and metaphors, and many other rhetorical devices to broaden your perspectives. I am writing this analysis in hopes you might reconsider the current stance you have taken up regarding the issues at hand.
...hile African Americans went through journeys to escape the restrictions of their masters, women went through similar journeys to escape the restrictions of the men around them. Immigrants further strived to fit in with the American lifestyle and receive recognition as an American. All three groups seemed to shape up an American lifestyle. Today, all three of these perceptions of freedom have made an appearance in our lives. As we can see, the transition of freedom from race equality to gender equality shows that freedom has been on a constant change. Everyone acquires their own definition of freedom but the reality of it is still unknown; people can merely have different perceptions of freedom. Nevertheless, in today’s society, African Americans live freely, women are independent, and immigrants are accepted in society. What more freedom can one possibly ask for?
Though “conservatism” and “conformity” were the catchphrases of the period there were nonconformity too. Dysfunctional families were there. Youth who were not satisfactory revolted against norms.
Carol Berkin was a talented woman; she was born in Mobile, Alabama. She earned bachelor 's certificate at Barnard College. Also, at Columbia University, she got M.A and PhD; she achieved the Bancroft Dissertation Award. She was chosen with her book: Jonathan Sewall: Odyssey of An American Loyalist by Carol Berkin (1974). Right now, Baruch College is where she becomes Presidential Professor of History; she is a member of history staff at CUNY Graduate Center. In addition, she is the writer, good editor; she has written many textbooks. They are published like A brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution (2002) that was translated into Chinese and Polish, Women of America: A History (1979), Clio in the classroom: Guide for Teaching
In American History, one must always be a good patriotic man or woman. In order to be that ideal good American, one must love their land and god over everything. Time came around and introduced the Progressive era into America, a time of greater change. However, change is portrayed different between the people and the government, different ideas, approaches, and battles to fight. To prove that one loves its home he or she must be willing to give up anything for their land, meaning their lives or even their children 's lives too. On a daily basis, we are being fed fictional stories that our government create for their own beneficial interest. The press lets these fictional stories hit the headlines, and therefore should believe what they say for being our only reliable source. With the government and the press being a tag-team duo, we are simply left handicapped and have only but to listen and get fooled by their desired decision
In the past decades, the struggle for gay rights in the Unites States has taken many forms. Previously, homosexuality was viewed as immoral. Many people also viewed it as pathologic because the American Psychiatric Association classified it as a psychiatric disorder. As a result, many people remained in ‘the closet’ because they were afraid of losing their jobs or being discriminated against in the society. According to David Allyn, though most gays could pass in the heterosexual world, they tended to live in fear and lies because they could not look towards their families for support. At the same time, openly gay establishments were often shut down to keep openly gay people under close scrutiny (Allyn 146). But since the 1960s, people have dedicated themselves in fighting for
The poem “America” by Tony Hoagland reflects on how peoples’ minds are clouded by small-scale items, money, and the unimportance of those items. Metaphors and imagery are utilized to emphasize the unimportance of materialistic items in America. How America is being flooded with unnecessary goods. The poem uses examples of people to create an example and connection to the overall meaning.
Life for most homosexuals during the first half of the Twentieth century was one of hiding, being ever so careful to not give away their true feelings and predilections. Although the 1920s saw a brief moment of openness in American society, that was quickly destroyed with the progress of the Cold War, and by default, that of McCarthyism. The homosexuals of the 50s “felt the heavy weight of medical prejudice, police harassment and church condemnation … [and] were not able to challenge these authorities.” They were constantly battered, both physically and emotionally, by the society that surrounded them. The very mention or rumor of one’s homosexuality could lead to the loss of their family, their livelihood and, in some cases, their lives. Geanne Harwood, interviewed on an National Public Radio Broadcast commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the Stonewall Riots, said that “being gay before Stonewall was a very difficult proposition … we felt that in order to survive we had to try to look and act as rugged and as manly as possibly to get by in a society that was really very much against us.” The age of communist threats, and of Joseph McCarthy’s insistence that homosexuals were treacherous, gave credence to the feeling of most society members that homosexuality was a perversion, and that one inflicted was one to not be trusted.
The Lavender Scare was an event (corresponding to the Cold War), where unjustified fear, mass incarceration, and repression of homosexual people (specifically gay men) was eminent. The scare resulted in numerous unemployment (specifically from government jobs), suicides, and an immense drop in the quality of life for homosexual citizens. The Lavender Scare coincides with the Red Scare primarily since society perceived homosexuality equally as menacing as communism (Troops 95). Additionally, society perceived the gay men as former communist (Johnson).
The background of homosexuality in the 1940’s and 50’s was harsh, but people started to be opened toward the rights. There were criticisms toward homosexuality in the early days of Milk. Gay men carried the labels of mentally ill or psychopathic. Often times, gay men committed suicide from harsh judgement and criticism that always followed them. Even though population of homosexuality grew and had jobs, they were harassed and beaten by the police. There were a lot of disapproval and hostility of homosexuality. Anita Bryant, a singer, made a campaign to oppose the rights of homosexuals. Christian forces and activists withdrew gay-right legislation which lead to Proposition 6. The harshness from background of homosexuality back in the 1940’s and 50’s took the freedom away from the homosexuals. After the harshness, there came a little bit of hope for the homosexuals in San Francisco. Castro, a city in San Francisco, became the center of gay neighborhood. In 1964, gay men formed Society of Individual Right (SIR), and 1,200 members joined. Homosexuals started having good views when Sipple who was gay saved the president from a gunshot. Finally in 1972, Board of Supervisor banned the discrimination law for homosexuals. Even though in 1940...
In addition, being lesbian, gay, bisexual or queer: LGBTQ, during the 1960’s is view as a crime and a mental illness and totally immoral in the United States. Amber faces oppression at work as well by her union representative. One time her boss was flirting with her and asking her to sleep with him, however, she told him that she was not sexually attracted to men and then she went to the union to let them know that her boss was disrespecting her, but the union representative told her that it was none of his business. The only reason why the union does not care about Amber's complaints is because she is a lesbian. It is an outrage that a human being must resist an inhuman injustice by being attracted to someone of the same sex. Amber got another job where they used to say they did not care about anyone’s sexuality, however, she got fired from that job after she appeared with her girlfriend at a party where her coworkers invited her. Both she and her girlfriend were “beat up, or left with anonymous nasty notes and ugly homophobic pictures in our lockers...” Amber got involved into political to fight against oppression and prejudice for the LGBTQ because “the cost of being both
At first, the idea of men with long hair was absurd and society considered it a sign of homosexuality. When it became clear that the establishment felt so strongly about hair, the attitudes of young rebels changed. One young man responded after being questioned about his unkempt appearance: Growing hair does not mean that I am or am not a homosexual. It does mean that I am willing to stand up for my rights as a human being and that includes my right to be harmless to all people. It also indicates my unwillingness to get on the treadmill of killing for a vast machine-like government. If I am scorned and called dirty because I allow hair to grow on my face and my head, then so much the better, for by this I indicate the seriousness of my belief. I scorn the society that has created this monstrous robot-like conformity that feeds the war machine as Hitler found robots to feed his war machine.