Debunking War Glory: A Study of 'Dulce et Decorum Est'

683 Words2 Pages

The poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” was written by Wilfred Owen and was published in 1920 two years after he was killed by enemy fire in World War I. Ironically, the cause of Owen’s death was also the source of his most admired work (Wilde). In the poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” Wilfred Owen seems to be using the speaker, similes, and allusion to convince the reader that there is a false glorification in joining the armed forces to fight in the war. At the age of 22 Wilfred Owen enlisted in the British Army in the year of 1915 a year after World War I began. In 1917 Owen was sent to France where he would get his first glimpse of war (Wilde). Many of Owen’s most popular war poetry was written while he was serving (Wilde), which would lead some to believe that he is the speaker in “Dulce et Decorum Est” (Wilde). Images of the speaker and his fellow soldiers as they “cursed through …show more content…

In the first few lines, he compares the men to “old beggars under sacks” who are “coughing like hags” (1-2). Here he is comparing the young, strong soldiers to old beggars, or old homeless people. The coughs of the men are uncontrollable, likely from the poisonous gas that lingers in the air. This simile helps to express to the reader how much war has deteriorated the bodies of the soldiers. The other similes used in “Dulce et Decorum Est” are the comparisons of the soldier dying from the poisonous gas that fills the air around the soldiers. As the speaker describes the dying soldier, “His hanging face, like a devil’s sick of sin (20) / Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud” (23). These similes explain the horrific visual that the speaker witnesses as his fellow soldier gives in to the poison that is taking over his body. Owen’s detailed comparisons will also help the reader to better understand why the speaker doesn’t find war to be sweet and

Open Document