Who Is Biased In The Crucible

532 Words2 Pages

In both “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee and “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller, Tom Robinson and John Proctor become victims of the justice system even though they were considered innocent. These novels show the biases of the justice system and misbehavior that a formal jury would follow at that time. While the convictions and trials are different, the theme of injustice is similar. In this essay, I will explain how the justice system is biased in a way that favors what they want, regardless of evidence or simple reasoning. The relationship in the justice system from 1692 to the 1930s changed greatly and the question whether Proctor or Robinson would be found guilty today may be different. In “To Kill a Mockingbird,” Tom Robinson, an African American, is accused of raping Mayella Ewell, a white woman. Despite evidence proving Robinson’s innocence, he was convicted of rape because of his skin color. The Justice System in the 1930s was extremely racist and prejudiced. To support this, in the text, Atticus Finch talks about how the …show more content…

Proctor was accused by fearful townspeople and a justice system filled with bias and unlogical solutions rather than evidence and reason. The Court in Salem, fearful of exorcisms and witches, understands and accepts unlogical accusations by dropping the gavel on the wood and saying if they admit to being witches, let them live but if not drown them, and if they float kill them, but if they drown they are not guilty. Proctor concludes his hearing saying he is innocent, as he does not want his last name to be in vain. To support this, John Proctor says “I have given you my soul; leave me my name!” (Arthur Miller, 114) He says this, meaning he will not sign anything to hurt his last name. Proctor's eventual execution highlights the dangers of a corrupt and biased justice system, where fear takes over justice and truth in all

Open Document