When I Heard The Learn D Astronomer

456 Words1 Page

The subject of science–what makes it so captivating for some people? Is it the analytical component of the domain or is it more so the phenomena that create endless wonders for some? Or the theorems that calculate the mysterious marvels of the universe? Walt Whitman takes these questions into account in his poem, “When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer” which discusses the weariness he experiences after attending an astronomer’s lecture, and how he would recover from this by wandering outside, under the stars. The speaker appreciates stargazing alongside pondering about the mystical sky in replacement of hearing a lecture and learning newfound knowledge of formulas to explain the universe. To express this feeling, he places a shift in tone after line 4 of the poem. This shift …show more content…

Before the shift in line 4, the speaker describes the astronomer’s lecture and what he has to offer from his presentation of the presumed ‘equations of the universe’. The speaker witnessed, “proofs, [figures], [that] were ranged in columns before [them]... / charts and diagrams, to add, divide, and measure them” (Whitman 2-3). All that the speaker heard was from a perspective where analysis is encompassed within the threads of the universe and the mysteries of science; where explanations are deemed of greater practicality than observations and simply enjoying the sight of the universe’s blessings. Which, during the transition, the speaker mentions that he dissented with the, “[many] applause[s].” (Whitman 4) and how, “soon, [the speaker] became tired and sick” (Whitman 5). The speaker finds these lectures about the speculations and proofs insipid, lifeless, and unremarkable. The applaud dedicated to the ‘learn’d astronomer’ from the audience did not convey its sense to the speaker. His disagreement with the applaud is further explained after the transition, where it is revealed that

Open Document