Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysis of fire and ice by robert frost
Robert frost critique
Robert frost critique
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical analysis of fire and ice by robert frost
Desire means an intense longing or want, while hate means an intense dislike or distaste. However, when the reader examines Robert Frost's “Fire and Ice” and William Blake's “A Poison Tree”, they may possibly notice the fact that desire and hate are intertwined. “Fire and Ice” discusses the idea of the end of the world, while “A Poison Tree” looks at the end of a relationship. In “Fire and Ice” and “A Poison Tree”, Frost and Blake make use of contrast, metaphors, and Biblical illusions to illuminate the bond between desire and hate. In “Fire and Ice”, Frost juxtaposes the destructive powers of fire and ice. Frost states that “from what [he's] tasted of desire[,] [he] holds with those who favor fire”(lines 3-4), implying that fire and desire are linked. Also, Frost states that “[he] think [he] know[s] enough about hate to know that for destruction[,] ice is also great and would suffice” (lines 6-9), suggesting that ice and hate are connected just like desire and fire. Frost suggests that both types of destruction are related when he mentions “if the world had to perish twice” and “ice is also great and would suffice” (5, 7-9). Is seems that Frost is hinting at the idea that ice would be just as powerful as fire if the world has to be destroyed twice. This equality between fire and ice show that both elements have different qualities, but are equally destructive. In “A Poison Tree”, Blake contrasts the foe's desire and the speaker's hate through the poison tree. The speaker mentions that “[the tree] [bore] an apple bright [which] the foe beheld it shine” (lines 10-11), suggesting the speaker's foe may have had a desire to understand the speaker's hate. The speaker's hate is fully revealed when he or she mentions “[being] glad [to... ... middle of paper ... ...show that desire and hate can run amok in the worst of times. In “Fire and Ice”, the desire and hate is shown to bring the downfall of humanity. In “A Poison Tree”, the desire and hate slowly worm into every crevice of the speaker's mind until it ends up warping his or her mind and soul. Frost's final statement, that “ice is also great[,] and would suffice” (7-9), shows that desire and hate will be humanity's undoing. In both poems, the hate and desire come naturally and it is almost impossible to stop. However, as Blake mentions, “I told my wrath, my wrath did end” (2), the easiest solution is to acknowledge it and deal with it. Or else you will end up like the speaker at the end of Blake's poem, “glad to see [your] foe[s] outstretched beneath the tree” (15-16), viewing everything from a distorted perspective and only feeling relief when your foes are eliminated.
The poem “A Poison Tree” by William Blake and the story, “The Cask of Amontillado” written by Edgar Allan Poe writes about revenge. Overall both the poem and the short story share how they developed the overall theme, and to express the act, each of the writings use dramatic irony and sensory
The last poem “Fire and Ice” by Robert Frost is about the end of the world. The use of the word “I” in the poem makes it appear to be Frost himself who is narrating this poem. This poem is more sing song in nature than the other poems because of its use of rhyme words like “fire”, “desire”, “twice”, “ice”, and “suffice” (cite poem p. 369). There is alliteration with the phrase “favor fire” (cite poem p 369). There is an implied reference to hell being the “fire” that would be brought on by “desire” or sin. The picture of the atomic bomb certainly adds to the word
An important element that is displayed in both love and hate is motivation. An example of this is portrayed in “A Note on My Son’s Face,” as the author states, “I wanted that face to die, to be reborn in the face of a white child” (35,36). This line displays a level of prejudice towards what is hers. Derricotte battles intense feelings of wanting a white looking child amongst a world where not being grateful for what she has is seen as hatred towards her son. She looks at the face of her black child and is filled with animosity for what he looks like and what he will become. This is where the motivational factor comes into play, and where the lines of love and hate really become blurred. Does she hate her child because of how he looks? or Does she love her child because she wants him to become better than what he is destined for? She is motivated by love to want him to become better than what she believes is possible for him, yet she displays hate in the sense that she is hurting the child for what he is, and also for what he has no control over. According to Rempel this grandmother is displaying both intense feelings of love and hate. Loving what is hers, but hating what it will become. Therefore, this poem supports the theory that love and hate are
When an emotion is believed to embody all that brings bliss, serenity, effervescence, and even benevolence, although one may believe its encompassing nature to allow for generalizations and existence virtually everywhere, surprisingly, directly outside the area love covers lies the very antithesis of love: hate, which in all its forms, has the potential to bring pain and destruction. Is it not for this very reason, this confusion, that suicide bombings and other acts of violence and devastation are committed in the name of love? In Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon, the reader experiences this tenuity that is the line separating love and hate in many different forms and on many different levelsto the extent that the line between the two begins to blur and become indistinguishable. Seen through Ruth's incestuous love, Milkman and Hagar's relationship, and Guitar's love for African-Americans, if love causes destruction, that emotion is not true love; in essence, such destructive qualities of "love" only transpire when the illusion of love is discovered and reality characterizes the emotion to be a parasite of love, such as obsession or infatuation, something that resembles love but merely inflicts pain on the lover.
I have always been of the belief that in order to truly love, hate must exist within the core of the relationship. Nowhere in modern fiction is this dictum examined more accurately than in the novel by James Cain, Mildred Pierce. Looking at the concept in a familial context, James Cain has created two well-developed characters, Mildred Pierce and her daughter, Veda, that not only emphasizes the nature of mother-daughter relationships, but looks at how love and hate permeates the very essence of the relationship. The Irish poet Thomas Moore once described the fascination of these violently fluctuating emotions, “When I loved you, I can’t but allow/ I had many an exquisite minute/ But the scorn that I feel for you now/ Hath even more luxury in it” (Tresidder 57).
Throughout history, the powers of love and hate have constantly been engaged in a battle for superiority. Time and time again, love has proven to be stronger than hate, and has been able to overcome all of the obstacles that have stood in the way from it reaching its goal. On certain occasions, though, hate has been a viable foe and defeated love when they have clashed. In the novel A Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens presents several different power struggles between love and hate.
“Some say the world will end in fire,/ Some say in ice./ From what I’ve tasted of desire/ I hold with those who favor fire./ But if it had to perish twice,/ I think I know enough of hate/ To say that for destruction ice/ Is also great/ And would suffice.” This poem by Robert Frost is an excellent example of how even though people tend to think that Frost’s poems are just fun easy to read poems, a lot of them actually have dark themes to them. The poem “Fire and Ice” quoted above is a poem all about death and his prefered way to die/ destroy the world. So, although the average reader will quote Robert Frost as being a poet of positivity, yet many of his poems actually point out the dark side of human existence.
Frost is far more than the simple agrarian writer some claim him to be. He is deceptively simple at first glance, writing poetry that is easy to understand on an immediate, superficial level. Closer examination of his texts, however, reveal his thoughts on deeply troubling psychological states of living in a modern world. As bombs exploded and bodies piled up in the World Wars, people were forced to consider not only death, but the aspects of human nature that could allow such atrocities to occur. By using natural themes and images to present modernist concerns, Frost creates poetry that both soothes his readers and asks them to consider the true nature of the world and themselves.
“Poetry is when an emotion has found its thought and the thought has found words,” Robert Frost once said. As is made fairly obvious by this quote, Frost was an adroit thinker. It seems like he spent much of his life thinking about the little things. He often pondered the meaning and symbolism of things he found in nature. Many readers find Robert Frost’s poems to be straightforward, yet his work contains deeper layers of complexity beneath the surface. His poems are not what they seem to be at first glance. These deeper layers of complexity can be clearly seen in his poems “The Road Not Taken”, “Fire and Ice”, and “Birches”.
The idiom “revenge is sweet” appears so frequently that one might think the cliché is true, yet the nature of revenge is far more complex and may leave more bitterness in its wake. The cyclical nature of revenge and man’s inhumanity to man means it has a propensity to intensify and devastate the people in its wake including the inflictor. Gabriel García Márquez’s Chronicle of a Death Foretold and Isabel Allende’s The House of the Spirits examine the theme of the nature of revenge through the presence and significance of prominent characters seeking revenge in both Latin American novels.
For one Bendrix begins the book as a “Record of Hate” (1951, 1.I.1) for he “hated Henry – Hated his wife Sarah too” (1951, 1.I.1) yet he questions whether his “hatred is really as deficient as my love” (1951, 2.II.44) and later acknowledges that his “hate got mislaid” (1951, 4.I.107). For him it is merely the loss of love that creates what he perceives as hate, yet even this dissipates and is realised to merely be anger and unhappiness. For Sarah it leads her to hate herself as “a bitch and a fake” (1951, 3.II.75), who leads others to unhappiness and cannot herself face her true emotions. Love within the end of the affair seems to destroy the everyday Façade and leaves behind the worst parts of our personality’s for Bendrix it’s his jealous possessiveness for Sarah it is her lies. Yet one cannot hate without love as “hatred seems to operate the same glands as love” (1951, 1.III.19) an idea that explains Bendrix so well, as even in his hatred he is still
Evil is a commonly used theme in literature; it is used to provide contrast between the protagonist and his/her trials. In Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, Shakespeare’s Othello, and Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado”, the horror of evil is manifested into the plot, affecting the characters in the story. Evil is embodied into story because of those who neglect it, its concentration into one character, and its manipulative power.
“Fire and Ice” is a poem that paints a bleak picture of the future in which there are two paths, fire and ice, that both lead to the end of the world. Frost uses language throughout the poem that appears to be simple, but is actually very effective at communicating deeper, insightful meanings. He connects fire and ice to desire and hate and creates multiple levels of complexity. For example, the simple passage “Some say the world will end in fire, / Some say in ice.” (“Fire and Ice” 1-2) introduces the two main symbols in the poem, but, at the same time, pulls the reader in because desire and hate are so personal and such a significant part of human nature. After the symbols are presented, the narrator involves himself or herself in the poem by saying “From what I’ve tasted of desire / I hold with those who favor fire.” (“Fire and Ice” 3-4). A clear decision is made here in favor of fire, implying that the narrator favors desire. Frost believes that the world will eventually be destroyed by destructive and negative human traits: desire, greed, and jealousy. Yet in Frost’s mind, these traits are still preferable to hate. This opinion is demonstrated by the narrator’s choice of fire. Frost prefers the heat of passion and fire to the ...
Romanticism was both an artistic and intellectual movement geared essentially toward emphasizing nature’s subliminal aura, the individual’s expression of emotion and imagination, and ultimately a heightened sense of consciousness. Widely acknowledged for his contributions to Romanticism, English poet William Blake is considered to be one of the most influential poets of the nineteenth century. Blake, a visionary far beyond his years, was adamant in expressing his views on the cosmos; that one cannot simply have the good without experiencing the bad nor can one have the bad without experiencing the good. Near the end of the seventeen hundreds, Blake published two highly acclaimed works supporting his claim that in order for the world to function as it does, all things in the universe must have an opposite, or a contrast. He published his poem collection entitled “Songs of Innocence and of Experience” in 1794 and finished composing his book “The Marriage of Heaven and Hell”, a few years prior to it. These two brilliant works exemplify exactly just how important a positive balance in the cosmos really is. William Black depicts good and evil in his poems with the use of the reference to joy and sorrow.
Throughout all of his literary works, Blake incorporates many classic romantic characteristics. But he also incorporated important people and events surrounding the time period. One of his most controversial works, “The Marriage of Heaven and Hell” explores three of the most prominent romantic themes in his works: the battle between good and evil, the presence of the supernatural and an affinity for nature. Most likely inspired by Emanuel Swedenborg’s “Heaven and Hell”, Blake used common romantic symbolism to demonstrate the prophetic meanings of the pieces in the book. In “The Marriage of Heaven and Hell”, Blake alludes to the idea that,