What's Fair John Stoossel

580 Words2 Pages

In John Stossel's article, "What’s Fair," he challenges the notion of government intervention as a cure for income inequality. Stossel's stance pivots on the assertion that government involvement worsens rather than improves the issue. He contends that bureaucratic interference suppresses economic growth and individual initiative, ultimately obstructing rather than promoting fairness and prosperity. Instead, Stossel advocates the quality of free markets, asserting that they offer the most successful pathway to equitable outcomes. By allowing competition and innovation to prosper, free markets empower individuals to succeed based on hard work, thereby creating a fairer society. However, critics argue that this perspective overlooks systemic barriers and confirms disparities that conserve …show more content…

He bolsters this claim by highlighting how government intervention worsens rather than improves inequality, using examples like “Donald Trump’s kids and Paris Hilton’s siblings were born rich”. That gave them a big advantage in life. Unfair!” underscoring the advantages granted by birth. This serves to underscore the systemic imbalance established within society, suggesting that government measures cannot correct such imbalances, specifically those tied to familial circumstances beyond individuals' control. Stossel contends that factors such as luck, intelligence, and entrepreneurial insight contribute to economic success, further emphasizing the limitations of government intervention in rectifying disparities rooted in personal attributes and circumstances. Reinforcing his broader argument against government conflict and in favor of the self-determination of individuals within a free market structure. No one is safe from income inequality. Government officials must refrain from preventing bad investments or how people regulate their money. Stossel touches on the idea that rich people are also affected by income

Open Document