Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on work life balance
Reflection on work life balance
Greed of capitalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection on work life balance
When the primitive starts to trade a shell for a shiny rock, they do not realize that that shell is the rudiment of modern currency and that shiny rock is called diamond, which is one of the expensive merchandise nowadays. When people find that trading makes people better off, the machines of commercial world switch on its engine and lead us into a modern market, where filled with ceaseless trading of commodity and endless chasing for money. With the speedy development of human society, people begin to raise a concern on the truly value of money or, as Michael Sandel says in his book, the worry on the development of society when everything seems can be up for sale. What money can buy and what money cannot buy? Can we really buy anything we want using money?
After reading the article written by Sandel, what surprises me is the service of surrogate mother in India, which sounds uncommon. However, as Hegel says, “what exists is reasonable”, the service must have some great advantages that attract “buyer” and “seller”. Indeed, couples finding a surrogate mother for their future babies spare many times, energy, or even money for the family. They can have more time to work, and additionally, the baby’s mother do not have to suffer from the pain when give birth. Money can buy convenience and efficiency. Who don’t want this benefit if he or she is able to afford?
However, we know that Sandel holds the belief that the greedy market society is need to be regulated for two reasons---the first is inequality, and the second is about corruption. When we consider the aspect on inequality, it is not hard to understand that when the rich get richer, they can buy more goods they want and dominates the market portion largely, and the poor people ge...
... middle of paper ...
...feel frustrated when they heard that they are going to be fired in the movie Margin Call. I do not think fired by boss is a depressive thing because it provides you a valued chance to make a move or to make a change to decide the next step of your rest of life. It is all in your controlled. You can live with little money but with great peaceful satisfaction. Or you choose to continue working for the next investment company. It’s all up to yourselves, but you should never forget that do not let the wealth strangle you. Let’s go back to see the assumption about the doctor’s dilemma, I think no matter how the doctor make the decision, he will be criticized and judged anyway at last because choosing either patient is wrong, which means giving up on the other one. So, what we have to do is follow the inner peace of our heart and try best to maximum the benefits for all.
Almost without realizing it, argues Sandel, we are gone from “having a market economy to being a market
The theory of “Diamond-water paradox” which also known as paradox of value was first introduced by the economist Adam smith in the 1700s. In his theories, he points out that practical thing that we use it frequently often have little or even no value in exchange. Examples for the things are like cups, socks and water. In contrast, things that is not practically or has little use to us often have the greatest value in the market. An example may be Sir Alex Ferguson’s last piece of chewing gum that has reportedly sold for nearly £390,000. Apparently, there is no other use but just looking at the chewing gum in the box for display but it has almost the same value as a luxury car or house. This is what “Diamond-water paradox” theory about by Adam
According to Wombs for Rent “ She got pregnant for a South African couple so she can afford her own home for the sake of her children’’. This shows that since Deepali was a surrogate mother for a couple in South Africa. She was able to give something to them which they needed help for and in return she got money which was able to save her from losing her home. Being able to have a home is important because it makes her feel safe and give her an opportunity to live a happy life and have the basic needs is important aspect of survival. Also, according to the article “ Universal public education doesn’t exist in India and her children like many kids from impoverished families would simply be put to work early were if not their mothers well paying contract”. This shows that money helps surrogate mothers to educate their children. Since in India education isn't free and money is needed to pay in order to go to school. If Daksa is a surrogate mother it will help her to pay the fee for her children so her children can go to school. Surrogacy will benefit Daksa because her job earning is very little as to how much she can earn from being a surrogate mother to pay for her children's education for a good
Of these two objections, Sandel seems to prefer the objection of corruption and how it questions that all goods are commensurable. Thus, while I will agree with Sandel on some of his points, such as that in today’s society there is little money can’t buy, I also wish to argue the limits of his argument pertaining to the extension of the market, the argument from corruption, and his views on surrogacy based off statements made in the
Commercial surrogacy commodifies children because by paying the surrogate mother to give up her child, they treat the child as an object of exchange or commodity that can be bought and sold. As any business transaction, the parents give money for the exchange of an object, the child. The parents get their desired child and the mother gets the money, but what about what thee child think about this event? The parents and surrogate mother’s action were done with self-interest. It could be argued that they wanted the best for the child. However, the first priority in the intentional procreation of the child was not the welfare of the child but rather to give it up to the parents in exchange of money. Additionally, women’s labor is commodified because the surrogate mother treats her parental rights as it was a property right not as a trust. In other words, the decisions taken concerning the child are not done primarily for the benefit of the child. The act of the mother relenting her parental rights is done for a monetary price. She disposes of her parental rights, which are to be managed for the welfare of the owner, as if they were property right, which are to be handled for personal
“Sometimes when making something so precious, beautiful and unique, it takes an extra helping heart” (Author Unknown). To me, surrogate motherhood is giving the gift of a child to an individual who cannot carry a child themselves. I chose this topic because it interests me to see what kind of problems are linked with the journey of surrogacy. I have seen plenty of fictional movies about surrogate mothers, and I wanted to learn if any of these issues happened in real life situations. Before I began my research I thought about the ethical, legal, and social problems that could arise during the process of surrogacy. Legally, I thought you could be a surrogate
Money is the main source of power in the world, but in ways it can be viewed as good or bad depending on the situation. It has a negative connotation when mentioned by the word “acts”. “ Acts” means to perform a fictional role. Which shows that most things involving money are fake. Though humans associate being fake with being morally wrong,but its somehow acceptable if there is a greater power involved. Another definition for acts is to take action;do something. In this case to take an action can be either good or bad. There are many ways to come across money, but nobody cares if it is good or bad because it deals with a greater power.
[9] Shanley, M.L, Surrogate Mothering and Women's Freedom: A Critique of Contracts for Human Reproduction, (Politics and the Human Body) editors-Elshtain, J.B, and Cloyd J.T1995, Vanderbitt University Press, Tennessee back
Theoretical by Engle’s brings to our attention that societies being divided into classes or estates, are determined by what is produced and how it is produced, and how the product is exchanged within those societies. The mode of production is changing, and we need to understand these changes. We can further enlighten ourselves on this society by seeing how commodities are being produced and also how the material needs of a society are being met. We are currently under the capitalist mode of production and it is irrational and unjust.
Arguments against commercial surrogacy typically revolve around the idea that surrogacy is a form of child-selling. Critics believe that commercial surrogacy violates both women’s and children’s rights. In addition, by making surrogacy contracts legally enforceable, courts will follow the contract rather than choose what is best for the child. However, in her article “Surrogate Mothering: Exploring Empowerment” Laura Pudry is not convinced by these arguments.
Money has evolved with the times and is a reflection of the progress of man. Early money was a physical commodity, grain, gold or silver. During the vital stage, more symbolic forms of money such as certificates of deposit, bank notes, checks, letters of credit, bonds and other forms of negotiable securities came into prominence. Social development transformed money into a trust, “In God We Trust' it says on the back of the ten-dollar bill.” (The Ascent of Money, 27)
A surrogacy is the carrying of a pregnancy for intended parents. There are two kinds of surrogacy: “Gestational”, in which the egg and sperm belong to the intended parents and is carried by the surrogate, and “traditional”, where the surrogate is inseminated with the intended father’s sperm. Regardless of the method, I believe that surrogacy cannot be morally justified. Surrogacy literally means “substitute”, or “replacement”. A surrogate is a replacement for a mother for that 9-month period of pregnancy, and therefore is reducing the role of the surrogate mother to an oversimplified and dehumanizing labor. The pregnancy process for the gestational mother can be very physically and mentally demanding, and is unique because after birthing the
Surrogacy is becoming extremely popular as a way for people to build their families and women to have a source of income. Many people have various reasons for their opposition to it whether it be by comparing it to prostitution or disagreeing with how military wives take advantage of the Tricare insurance. Lorraine Ali states in her article “The Curious Lives of Surrogates” that one of the more popular reasons to oppose surrogacy is that it contradicts, “what we’ve always thought of as an unbreakable bond between mother and child.” However, a woman’s inability to conceive her own children does not determine the absence of a mother to child bond.
The invention of money was a major improvement in peoples’ lives. In the past, people usually had to travel all day to find the person who is willing to exchange their goods. In addition, the goods people want to exchange did not have the standard value of measurement. This led to unequal exchanges. Furthermore, it is not convenient to carry heavy goods from one place to another for an exchange. To solve these issues, money will be the only solution. Later, people tend to develop money from cowry shells to credit cards for the convenience and to improve their society.
It seems only natural that happiness should flow from having more money. Even if they don’t admit it, people still behave as though it were true. More money means you can have what you want and do what you want. The house you dream of? It’s yours. The new car you desire? Here are the keys. The freedom to enjoy your favourite pastimes? Here’s your racket, the court is down there, just past the pool.