Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Land registration and its principles
Land registration and its principles
Land registration and its principles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Land registration and its principles
Land, as defined in s205(1)(ix) Law of Property Act 1925 (hereafter LPA 1925), is both tangible in nature by its physical assets and intangible by the rights and interests in and over the land. It is important to note that as physical property is attached to the property and transfers under new ownership, so are the rights and interests attached and transferred with it, both the benefit and the burden. The problem however was identifying the rights being transferred which was made easier by the legislative reform to advocate land registration, this in turn formed two separate systems in land law, the system of registered land where the basis of ‘title’ was in the Register and the old system of unregistered land where the basis of ‘title’ required finding the ‘root of title’ over fifteen years to confirm possession. In doing so, it ensures the current vendor has the right over the land for it to be sold, in addition to any defects of title and any rights/interests that are associated within the land for the purchaser to be made aware of.
In addition to the aforementioned problem of identifying the rights was the complex process of discovering ‘root of title’ and finding the owners of the said rights in order to protect their interest in a piece of land. However the problem rested majorly in the name-based land charges register which made the process difficult by land charges incorrectly recorded against wrong or incorrect versions of names. Another problem was the protection of rights for those ‘in actual occupation’ who would lose the right if the right was not registered, as occurred in Hollington Bros v Rhodes [1951] and Lloyds Bank v Carrick [1996]. It is therefore understood that there is an onus on the purchaser, regardles...
... middle of paper ...
.../www.lawteacher.net/land-law/essays/under-the-land-registration-act-law-essays.php [accessed 5 May 2014]
E-LAWRESOURCES., 2014. Williams & Glyns Bank v Boland [online]. E-lawresources. Available at: http://e-lawresources.co.uk/Land/Williams--and--Glyns-Bank-v-Boland.php [accessed 5 May 2014]
LAND REGISTRY., April 2012. Practice Guide 15 – Overriding interests and their disclosire [online]. Croydon: Land Registry. Available at: http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/professional/guides/practice-guide-15 [accessed 5 May 2014]
JaceyWongL.C, 2012. Land Law - Leases. Dear Samantha S [blog] 5 May. Available at: http://theladyj2nd.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/land-law-leases.html [accessed 8 May 2014]
H1, 2012. Easements & Profits à Prendre. UK Law [blog] 3 June. Available at: http://lawnotesh1.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/easements-profits-prendre.html [accessed 8 May 2014]
The amendments to the Land Title Act 1994 introduced in s. 185(1A) and s. 11A requiring reasonable steps to be taken to ensure the person who executed the instrument as mortgagor is identical with the person who is, or who is about to become, the registered proprietor of the
In Palgo Holdings v Gowans , the High Court considered the distinction between a security in the form of a pawn or pledge and a security in the form of a chattel mortgage. The question was whether section 6 of the Pawnbrokers and Second-hand Dealers Act 1996 (NSW) (‘the 1996 Pawnbrokers Act’) extended to a business that structured its loan agreements as chattel mortgages. In a four to one majority (Kirby J dissenting) the High Court found that chattel mortgages fell outside the ambit of section 6 of the 1996 Pawnbrokers Act. However, beyond the apparent simplicity of this decision, the reasoning of the majority raises a number of questions. Was it a “turning back to literalism” as Kirby J suggested, or was it simply a case where the court declares that parliament has missed its target?
The National Apology of 2008 is the latest addition to the key aspects of Australia’s reconciliation towards the Indigenous owners of our land. A part of this movement towards reconciliation is the recognition of Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders rights to their land. Upon arrival in Australia, Australia was deemed by the British as terra nullius, land belonging to no one. This subsequently meant that Indigenous Australians and Torres Strait Islanders were never recognised as the traditional owners. Eddie Mabo has made a highly significant contribution to the rights and freedoms of Indigenous Australians as he was the forefather of a long-lasting court case in 1982 fighting for the land rights of the Torres Strait Islanders. Eddie Mabo’s introduction of the Native Title Act has provided Indigenous Australians with the opportunity to state claim to their land, legally recognising the Indigenous and the Torres Strait Islanders as the traditional owners.
no-one will bother you on your land” (pg.105). This incident leads to a long chain of corrupt acts. All community members signed, rather, finger printed the document and we’re assured “they could rely on this paper as it is the title to the land”. 105). The 'Standard' is a 'Standard'.
This essay is about the land rights of of Australia and how Eddie Marbo was not happy about his land been taken away from him. In May 1982 Eddie Marbo and four other people of the Murray Islands began to take action in the high court of Australia and confirming their land rights. Eddie Marbo was a torres islander who thought that the Australian laws were wrong and who went to fight and try and change them. He was born in 1936 on Mer which is known as Murray Island. The British Crown in the form of the colony of Queensland became of the sovereign of the islands when they were annexed in1978. They claimed continued enjoyment of there land rights and that had not been validly extinguished by the sovereign. (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2012)
Does the introduction of a system of registration of title remove the need for the law to recognise possessory or equitable interests in land? Why? Why not?
An issue facing society is whether the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), is sufficient in balancing the rights of Indigenous Australians and the rights of current land owners. To determine whether legislation is sufficient and fair, an investigation into the current societal view points needs to be considered by legislators, with an evaluation into the ways in which other societies cater to the needs of Indigenous land owners should be made. This information then allows recommendations and changes to be debated, to therefore to ensure more equitable legislation on land rights within Australia.
9. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003). Legal Studies for Queensland, Volume 1, ForthEdition, Legal Eagle Publications: Queensland. 10. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003).
Land rights now referred to the continual legal exertion to reclaim ownership of the land and waters that was called home prior to British colonisation (Creative Spirits, 2011). Australian Museum (2015) and Creative Spirits (2011) acknowledge the struggle to gain legal recognition and ownership of Indigenous land is difficult and expensive. Furthermore, the history behind the struggle in earlier years often resulted in violence as Indigenous Australians were dispossessed of their land (Australian Museum, 2015). Subsequently, the struggle for land rights continued through the legal and political systems; as demonstrated in 1982 when Eddie (Koiki) Mabo and four other Meriam people decided to pursue declaration of their customary land rights in the High Court of Australia (Hill, 1995). Based on the findings of Creative Spirits (2011) Indigenous Australian land rights appeared promising in 1983 when the Hawke Government promised legislation to ensure that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s land rights are protected throughout Australia. The legislation was said to permit Indigenous Australians to exercise the right of control over mining on Indigenous Australian land to ensure sacred sites are protected (Creative Spirits, 2011). However, in 1984 the mining companies fought back to repossess control over land. Mining and pastoral industries were considered too powerful and
Wales have challenges that they need to beat in usage in their country that is they want to develop property by enhancing the economic, social and environmental well being of individuals and communities. (Letsrecycle, 2010).
person receiving the land, had to go through ceremony in which they would say that they
Foner, Eric, and John A. Garraty. "Homestead Act." The Reader's Companion to American History. Dec. 1 1991: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 06 Feb. 2014.
One of the special concepts in land law is of overriding interests. The standard practice in the English land law is all the interest and rights affecting or is binding over particular a land should be registered in the Register. However, the concept of overriding interest denotes that there are interests which are binding on the owner (the registered proprietor) regardless of not being formally registered. It was introduced because in that era it was though that it would be unreasonable and unjust to overlook such rights and interest enjoyed. Overriding interests need not be registration to bind the legal owner of the land. Therefore, if the land is sold to another person the interests and rights would not be lost. It can be said that overriding by nature are unregistered if they are registered they will cease to be an overriding interest.
Having set the aims, objectives and research questions in the first chapter, this chapter zooms in to review literature available on the subject of land tenure regularization and its effect on housing investment from different parts of the world with specific reference to cities. The emphasis of this chapter is to analyse the link between land tenure regularization and housing investment in informal settlements. Also, the focus is on securing land rights in informal settlements, since it is widely believed that regularization of informal settlement rights leads to (increased) access to formal finance which subsequently encourages housing investment (Chome and McCall, 2005). The chapter starts with contextual definition of key terms, and then followed by global documentation on the impact of tenure regularization in informal settlement, focusing on the experiences of some selected countries. Since the aim of the research is to investigate the effect of land tenure regularization on informal housing investment and that both the Zambian Local Authorities and the government have intention to regularize informal settlements, lessons learnt from the case study countries will be noted, after which the chapter will be concluded in section 2.6 by way of a summary.
The courts of England and Wales acknowledge that the above must be something of value, in order to amount to consideration. A valuable consideration in the perspective of the English La...