Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Civil rights movements
Civil rights movements
Civil rights movements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Civil rights movements
Criminal disenfranchisement is defined as the loss of the right to vote by a person convicted of or sentenced to imprisonment for a felony. Since before the civil war, this practice has been a part of the United States justice system mostly as a means to handle the racial issues with voting but then also in regards to the felons and rebels that participated in the Southern “rebellion” during the Civil War. This practice has recently gained some popularity since a debate has developed as to whether it is unconstitutional or not. Is voting a right or a privilege? First let’s define what a right is. A right is defined as something to which a person is entitled. Most American rights are determined by our constitution. Next let’s define privilege. A Privilege is a special advantage enjoyed by a particular group. You could say that anyone over the age of 16 has the privilege to drive. So when it comes to voting it has a very gray area as to how we should define whether it is a right allotted by the constitution, or whether it is a privilege given to those who follow the laws of America. A major determining factor as to whether this type of punishment is considered constitutional is that of the 2nd clause of the 14th Amendment which repealed the Three-Fifths compromise, stating that the Penalty Clause which allowed the ability to vote to be revoked for those that participated in “rebellion or other crime”. This exception applied to criminals and also to those who had participated in the Southern “rebellion” during the Civil War. Even though this section of the Amendment states that it is not unconstitutional it is still a large debate as to whether states should be allowed to put restrictions on voting. (US Const., amend. XIV) Current... ... middle of paper ... ...rks Cited Beeman, Richard R. "Amendments to the Constitution ." The Penguin guide to the United States Constitution: a fully annotated Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and amendments, and selections from the Federalist Papers. New York: Penguin Group, 2010. 75-78. Print. "Criminal Disenfranchisement Laws." Brennan Center for Justice. New York University School of Law, n.d. Web. 16 Apr. 2014. . Hinchcliff, Abigail M. "The ‘Other’ Side of Richardson v. Ramirez: A Textual Challenge to Felon Disenfranchisement." Yale Law Journal 121.1 (2011): 194-236. Yale Law Journal. Web. 16 Apr. 2014. Uggen, Christopher, Angela Behrens, and Jeff Manza. "Criminal Disenfranchisement." Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1 (2005): 307-322. University of Minnesota-Magrath Library (Twin Cities). Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
Today, millions of American citizens are working and paying their taxes and have a productive life in the community(3). raising families and going to work but do not have a voice in local or national affairs that may or may not even affect them(3). To be blunt, if we keep denying released felons the right to vote, we will keep losing touch with the fundamentals of our democracy. Our poll numbers will keep going down, and people who want to vote won’t be able to. We will be denying them a helpful tool for reintegration or rehabilitation, even if it doesn’t.
Uggen, Christopher, Sarah Shannon, and Jeff Manza. "State-Level Estimates of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States, 2010." The Sentencing Project News -. The Sentencing Project, 20 Aug. 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.
The work by Victor M. Rios entitled Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys and Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness depict ways in which policing and incarceration affect inequalities that exist in society. In this body of work I will draw on specific examples from the works of Victor M. Rios and Michelle Alexander to fulfill the tasks of this project. Over the course of the semester and by means of supplemental readings, a few key points are highlighted: how race and gender inequalities correlate to policing and incarceration, how laws marginalize specific groups, and lastly how policing and incarceration perpetuate the very inequalities that exist within American society.
Attempt by Congress to strike a balance between society's need for protection from crime and accused right to adequate proce...
Schultz, David, and John R. Vile. The Encyclopedia of Civil Liberties in America. 710-712. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Gale Virtual Reference Library, n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2010. .
In the United States 2.2 million citizens are incarcerated on felony charges. Laws in America prohibit felons from voting. As a result, on Election Day 5.3 million citizens of America are disenfranchised because of crimes they once committed. Though they once broke the law, they have served their time and have been punished adequately in accordance with the American Justice System. Felons should regain full voting rights after their stint in prison.
Many people believe that felons do not deserve the right to vote. For these people, voting is not an inherent right; rather it is a privilege given to deserving people that wish to make a positive change to their lives. Some believe that, “…there is no reason for a felon to vote or to debate about whether or not they have that right…they made the choice to break the law, so why should they have any say in making it?” {Siegel} In this point of view, giving felons the right to vote is similar to rewarding them. With the right to vote, felons are still able to sway decisions regarding the lives of a society they are no longer a part of. Felons are meant to be punished, stripped of numerous rights including that of voting. Punishments, then, are made to restrict a person, not give them more freedom and decision.
The United States is one of the only few democratic countries that disenfranchises convicted felons. An estimated 5.85 million people charged with a felony are banned from voting. Moreover, felon disenfranchisement laws are a form of racial discrimination because a large percentage of felons are Hispanic, Latino or African American that have been incarcerated as a result of racial profiling. Denying felons from voting is unconstitutional since the right to vote and cast a ballot is supposed to be the cornerstone of democracy. Felons who have completed their sentence should be restored their right to vote as they should be able to participate in elections just like every other citizen. Despite being charged with a felony, felons are also American
... 2 -. Copyright 2006 by Northwestern University, School of Law. Hull, Elizabeth. The Disenfranchisement of Ex-Felons.
Whisner, Mary. "Race in the Criminal Justice System." Law.washington.edu. 10 Oct. 2013. University of Washington School of Law. 13 Nov. 2013 .
“Most Supreme Court Cases regarding criminal justice try to strike a balance between the rights of the individual and the rights of the society. The Supreme Court has the difficult task of bringing balance between these two often conflicting goals.” (POLICE, 2011, p.181).
Marshall, Burke . "The Protest Movement and the Law." Virginia Law Review 51.5 (1965): 785-
Works Cited The "Civil Rights" Cornell University Law School, Inc. 2010. Web. The Web. The Web. 1 Apr. 2011.
333-356. Mauer, Marc. A. The Race to Incarcerate. The Case For Penal Abolition?