What Was The Iconoclastic Controversy?

426 Words1 Page

What was the Iconoclastic Controversy? The Iconoclastic Controversy all started when Emperor Leo III of the Eastern part of the Byzantine Empire, removed an image of Jesus from the imperial palace in Constantinople. The reason for his action may be due the fact that he believed that icons of Jesus were Idolatrous. He felt that he was purifying the church by removing the image because it went against the second of the Ten Commandments which prohibits the creation of idols to be worshipped. The iconoclasts, like Emperor Leo III, made an argument which supported the Emperor’s actions. Their argument suggested that in order to represent Christ appropriately, we must do so with respect to both his humanity and divinity, or to his humanity only; but to only represent his humanity would be Nestorian heresy because …show more content…

His refusal to change his mind on the subhect is what eventually led Emperor Leo to force him out of office. His replacement, of course, was an Iconoclast named Anastasius. Seeking help, Germanus made an appeal to the West, which was accepted by Pope Gregory II. Even after Pope Gregory II’s death, his successor Pope Gregory III continued to support Germanus. As a Way to punish the West for their support, Emperor Leo took away land that was under the control of the Pope, which made tensions between the East and the West stronger. John of Damascus, came to the defense of idols, and was responsible for writing three treaties in its defense. He claimed that since God became visible in the incarnation, that it was no longer idolatry because they were not representing the invisible God. He also claimed that the feelings of unworthiness towards idols and images would eventually spread to the matter of Christ. Eventually Constantine’s mother Irene with the help of Pope Hadrian, won over the member of the Council and they ruled that icons have a legitimate role in worship, but this victory was short lived because Emperor Leo II

Open Document