Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Preventing stereotypes
Essay on the depths of stereotypes
Essay on the depths of stereotypes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Preventing stereotypes
What kind of person are you? Maybe you are the nice girl everyone loves, or maybe you are the mean girl, or you even might be the person who no one ever talks to? The thing is it does not matter who you are, what matters is the quote from Barbara Jordan “We as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.”. The quote goes with three stories; “What, of This Goldfish, Do You Wish” by Etgar Keret, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, and “My So-Called Enemy” by Lisa Gossels. In “What, of This Goldfish, Do You Wish” by Etgar Keret the story begins with a man making a documentary named Yonatan knocks on Sergei’s door. When Sergei answers the door the man asks him “That if he had a magic goldfish that would grant …show more content…
you three wishes what would you wish.” the story then says “Sergei tells the boy, tells him in what he thinks is a straightforward manner, that he doesn’t want it.” this sounds suspicious when you first read this however, you will find out that Sergei has a magic goldfish that would grant him three wishes. Then, if you keep reading on then you will find out that all he really wanted was not to be alone, which takes us back to the quote “We as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.”. So when Sergei left his hometown and moved far away, he did not know anyone and did not accept anyone different so he was alone. So when he found the magic goldfish Sergei tried to keep it to himself so he was not alone and he did that by not making his last wish. That's why when you finish the story and find out that he used his last wish to save the guy who knocked on his door. So when the guy came back to ask Sergei the question, however, “Sergei only asked for a friend so he wouldn't be alone.” Now, the next story that goes with the quote “We as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” is called “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson there's a part in there that says “that over in the north village they’re talking about giving up the lottery.” which when you first read that you might think why in the world would people give up the chance of getting money, however, when you keep reading you find out that the lottery is not all that you think it is.
When you keep reading you find this, "Listening to the young folks, nothing's good enough for them. Next thing you know, they will be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work anymore, lives that way for a while. Used to be a saying about 'Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon." and that goes with our quote “We as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” The people in the village that are saying that are making it sound like they don’t like the people in the other village because they are thinking they are giving up the lottery. Which is kind of mean for the reason that it does not matter what you do, what matters is that we are all human on the inside and outside. Then, after you finish the story you read this "It isn't fair," she said. A stone hit her on the side of the head...It isn't fair, it isn't right," Mrs. Hutchinson screamed, and then they were upon her.” so that means the lottery is actually a sacrifice which is very dark and …show more content…
demented. So, it's no surprise her story "The Lottery" when she published it in a newspaper called The New Yorker in 1948, they got rid of it because the people who read the story sent hundreds of letters expressing their feelings over the tale because how dark it was. “My So-Called Enemy” by Lisa Gossels is the last story that goes with the quote “We as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” by Barbara Jordan, the reason is you have a conflict between the people in Israel.
Six Palestinian and Israeli teenage girls Adi, Hanin, Gal, Inas, Rawan, and Rezan become committed to justice and mutual understanding of peace. All the girls are very different from each other like they may all have different ideas about each other however, they all have one thing in common which is they are all human no matter what. When you watch just the beginning of the trailer you hear that “Conflict between Israel the Jews and Palestinians and neither side will cease fire on each other” and when they are saying this you have a very peaceful sunrise to try and soften the mood up. Then, when you keep watching, the trailer goes back seven years earlier and that is when the teenage girls come in. You first hear that some of the girls do not quite get along however they all love each other as friends even though one of the girls blames that the other girl's people killed her father. Finally, in the end of the trailer, all of the girls looked pasted who their people were and looked only at what is on the inside, which of course brings us back to the quote “We as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” For the reason that all the girls looked beyond the past and looked into their own
hearts. So in conclusion, all three stories; “What, of This Goldfish, Do You Wish” by Etgar Keret, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, and “My So-Called Enemy” by Lisa Gossels all connect back to the quote by Barbara Jordan “We as human beings, must be willing to accept people who are different from ourselves.” Because it does not matter if you're new, or if you're weird, or even creepy, all that matter is what is on in the inside.
Instead of choosing to harden up and resolve it, they decide to continue the war started by their own ancestors. Disappointed. I am not a fan of adolescents. The integration of ‘90s pop culture references such as Hawaiian shirts, cigarettes, drugs, and Radiohead also makes it way more interesting for younger viewers. The casting of both Leonardo DiCaprio and fresh-faced Claire Danes influence how the film is viewed.
“The Lottery” is a short story about an event that takes place every year in a small village of New England. When the author speaks of “the lottery” he is referencing the lottery of death; this is when the stoning of a village member must give up his or her life. The villagers gather at a designated area and perform a customary ritual which has been practiced for many years. The Lottery is a short story about a tradition that the villagers are fully loyal to and represents a behavior or idea that has been passed down from generation to generation, accepting and following a rule no matter how cruel or illogical it is. Friends and family become insignificant the moment it is time to stone the unlucky victim.
In Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery,” the theme of the story is dramatically illustrated by Jackson’s unique tone. Once a year the villagers gather together in the central square for the lottery. The villagers await the arrival of Mr. Summers and the black box. Within the black box are folded slips of paper, one piece having a black dot on it. All the villagers then draw a piece of paper out of the box. Whoever gets the paper with the black dot wins. Tessie Hutchinson wins the lottery! Everyone then closes in on her and stones her to death. Tessie Hutchinson believes it is not fair because she was picked. The villagers do not know why the lottery continues to exist. All they know is that it is a tradition they are not willing to abandon. In “The Lottery,” Jackson portrays three main themes including tradition, treason, and violence.
The villagers think of the lottery as a chore, rather than a slaughter. The lottery to them is nothing more than another errand, a task that they need to fulfill once a year. They dread the lottery not because one of them will be killed, but because it consumes their valuable time and energy. They seem to forget the importance of the life they take away every year, instead complaining about how long and drawn-out the process or taking away said life is. The director of the lottery even wants it over quickly. ?Well now,? Mr. Summers said soberly, ?guess we better get started, get this over with, so?s we can go back to work?? (Jackson, 239) This statement shows that the people no longer care about the life that will soon be ended, but that they have work to do, and the lottery is in their way of finishing it. Moreover, ...
"The Lottery," a short story written by Shirley Jackson, is a tale about a disturbing social practice. The setting takes place in a small village consisting of about three hundred denizens. On June twenty-seventh of every year, the members of this traditional community hold a village-wide lottery in which everyone is expected to participate. Throughout the story, the reader gets an odd feeling regarding the residents and their annual practice. Not until the end does he or she gets to know what the lottery is about. Thus, from the beginning of the story until almost the end, there is an overwhelming sense that something terrible is about to happen due to the Jackson's effective use of foreshadowing through the depiction of characters and setting. Effective foreshadowing builds anticipation for the climax and ultimately the main theme of the story - the pointless nature of humanity regarding tradition and cruelty.
Even though they are not as fortunate as us, they never gave up on having a better future. They were determined to fight for what they want and need. One of the most recurring theme was education. The statistic (in the movie) shows that if there are more girls in school, there would be less cases of HIV among them. What I found hopeful and uplifting was that the girls were so determined and persistent towards feminism and education rights. It inspires and motivates me to want to do something with my life, because I see now how fortunate I am to have a secured
The seemingly normal village is using a lottery system to pick a human for sacrifice that is executed by the villagers themselves. In one analysis it is thought that, “In a sense, the villagers of “The Lottery” are paying homage to sympathetic magic: One human sacrifice equals another good year of crops.” (Ball 1). It appears that this is why they are continuing the tradition of yearly human sacrifice around the time of harvest or summer solstice. This horrific event is amplified by the characters attitudes, environment, and outward normality. In another analysis, it states, “Nevertheless, the characters seem so wholesome, so stereotypically small-town American, that it is easy for the reader to overlook the clues that Jackson provides.” (Du Bose, 1). The slaughter of a fellow villager has become such a mindless habit to the villagers that they don’t question the reasons or morality of the lottery. The village is almost desensitized from violence and appears that they are unable to make their own conclusions about morality or human nature. In Patrick J. Shield’s article, he analyzes the characters and states, “They do not question the authority and tradition of these executions that has convinced them that what they are doing is somehow in their best interest”
The plot as a whole in “The Lottery” is filled with ironic twists. The whole idea of a lottery is to win something, and the reader is led to believe that the winner will receive some prize, when in actuality they will be stoned to death by the rest of the villagers. The villagers act very nonchalant upon arriving at the lottery; which makes it seem as if it is just another uneventful day in a small town. Considering the seriousness of the consequences of the lottery, the villagers do not make a big deal about it. Under the same note it is ironic that many of the original traditions of the lottery, such as the recital and the salute, had long been forgotten. All that the villagers seemed to remember was the ruthless killing of a random person. It also seems strange that they let the equipment for the lottery, the black box, get into such a poor condition.
The author finally has Mrs. Hutchinson speak up against the lottery but only because she is the one picked to be sacrificed, Mr Hutchinson states states in the story, "It isn 't fair, it isn 't right," Mrs. Hutchinson screamed, and then they were upon her (Jackson 295). Mrs Hutchinson is an interesting character since she at first agreed on the lottery but when she became the person picked she started to protest because she didn 't want to die. She was dodging her obligation by following the crowd and on decided to speak up on the town’s crazy lottery system because she was the one person chosen to die. Mrs Hutchinson is a very hypocritical and tries to remain popular person, because she never speaks up until it was too late. This reflects on the way many people in our society act like today, they constantly follow the popular things even though they might actually not be the right thing to do. Many readers can see how this book about this twisted town represents some of the problem in our
The lottery in the story was the game in which the prize was death. In reality this lottery symbolized the game of life, and how our behavior as human beings influences our choices in life and therefore our destiny. In this case the lottery signified winning eternal peace. This symbol helped the author develop the meaning of the story, because it is all based on the game of winning or losing. The way people from the village conducted the lottery was kind of scary, because they organized it as if it was another important event, such as the “square dances, the teenage club, the Halloween program” (Jackson 212). This shows how this tradition was taken as seriously as other occurrences that took place in the village. A person with some logic would not find this to be exactly a “game”, but the population followed the tradition and did not even think about the possibility to drop it, because then they would not know what to do, or what other event would they organize for June 27th. During the lottery Mr. Adams said “some places have already quit the lotteries” as of insinuating that if the neighbor towns forgot about the tradition, they should not have to keep following it (215). The bad thing is that no one paid attention to hi...
Every year, the lottery is held, and every year a person is killed. Each villager neglects to acknowledge the unjustness of the lottery and continue to participate because of the tradition it represents in their society. The lottery was a cultural tradition passed down from the very first settlers of the village. It makes up a huge part of the village’s history and culture. The villagers pay recognition to their culture by continuing the tradition of the lottery even though the lottery is not morally right. On page 93 it states, “There was a proper swearing-in of Mr. Summers by the postmaster, as the official of the lottery; at one time, some people remembered, there had been a recital of some sort, performed by the official of the lottery, a perfunctory tuneless chant that had been rattled off duly each year… There had been, also, a ritual salute, which the official of the lottery had had to use in addressing each person who came to draw from the box…” This quote shows the tribal-like rituals and traditions associated with the lottery. Through the years, some of the rituals of the lottery were lost, but the main elements of the lottery remained the same. The idea behind the lottery was that the ancestors, of the villagers, believed that human sacrifice would bring in good harvest. This led to the development and continuation
When people think of a lottery, they draw an image with a big amount of money in head. However in the story “The Lottery”, the price is death. It starts in the morning of a bright, peaceful day, people are gathering in the square, children picking stones and piles them; also the black box uses for drawing, “the original paraphernalia for the lottery had been put into use even before Old Man Warner, the oldest man in town, was born.” (Jackson 205). Author put us to believe that the villagers are devotional, and take this event...
After watching “My so-called Enemy” it gave me insight into lives of others who struggle constantly with everyday life. This film shows the constant battles between the Palestinians and Israeli’s and how they’re two cultures are significantly different. The building bridges program offers a place of tolerance, where the girls thoughts and feelings are heard and allows them to take a step closer to “building a bridge” towards peace. It is not to make them come to an agreement or develop a solution but to create a safe environment to be themselves.
"The Lottery" utilizes an objective third-person perspective to create suspense and foreshadow the ending. It begins by introducing a village and its people on a "clear and sunny" morning, "with the fresh warmth of a full-summer day" (NA, 781), with people finishing their tasks in order to gather for an annual town lottery. The narrator describes the community in a manner similar to that of an observant visitor. When the children leave school for the summer, with the boys gathering stones and the girls talking aside them, the reader is comforted by the light-hearted atmosphere of the village. It seems like a normal, idyllic town with simple people that seem stereotypic of a small rural community, where the men are absorbed in talking about "planting and rain, tractors and taxes"(NA, 781) and the women gather to exchange "bits of gossip" (NA, 782). In the beginning, the reader discovers that as opposed to larger towns that also hold the lottery, this village could finish the event in late morning and "still be through in time to allow the villagers to get home for noon dinner" (NA, 781). Mr. Summer, who carries out the drawing and who is described as a "round-faced, jovial man" (NA, 782), adds to the sense of normality in the town and upcoming lottery.
One of the Palestinian boys in the film says the Jewish people should be killed. One of the Orthodox Jewish boys says that the Palestinians need to be removed. Attitudes like the ones expressed by the children are deeply rooted in Palestinian and Israeli culture. Feelings of distrust and disdain expressed by some of the children on each side of the conflict stem from each side’s community believing that it is their God given right to occupy the land of Israel. If they did not take their scriptures literally, it might have been possible for the Jewish nation to be established elsewhere and the Israeli/ Palestinian conflict