Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influences on George Washington
How george washington impacted the world
What was the significance of George Washington's presidency
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influences on George Washington
Old President New Election The presidential seat is of higher power and holds the United States in his or her hands. The president is the one who is in charge and tries to maintain the stableness of peace though-out the world. The president not only handles national affairs, he or she also maintains international stability for the benefit of our country. For this reason and more, people see the president as their leader and the one that wants what best for their country. The United States president should be understanding, head-strong, and willing to sacrifice for the greater good of the American people. George Washington would be the one I vote for because he wanted honesty, diligence, and purity. As a young boy, George Washington …show more content…
was soon to be on his own. George Washington was born on February 22, 1732 to Augustin Washington and Mary Ball Washington. George Washington had other siblings, so when his father passed away he went to live with his half-brother Lawrence. As he lived with Lawrence, he taught himself to use surveying instruments and this showed he understood what he wanted to do when he got older. George Washington was later put into command over Virginia militia. Washington had no experience until the French and Indian War and then came the American Revolution. Washington saw how the taxes imposed by Britain were making its mark on the country that he loved. Washington’s mind was set on that the United States needed to gain our independence back and this lead to him being the commander in chief of the Continental Army. Washington was a head-strong man by leading his country to freedom from Britain and doing it with little experience. During the American Revolution, on Christmas Day, Washington was leading 2,400 of his troops across a half-frozen river with two other divisions equaling 3,000 which failed to make it across the freezing water. Washington was willing to sacrifice his life and others to do what he thought was right. George Washington is an honest man and true to his country and himself.
Washington declined his third term and he did not want any finical or political reward for his services, and said, “I hope I shall always possess firmness and virtue enough to maintain (what I consider the most enviable of all titles) the character of an honest man.” This statement is quoting that Washington wanted to stay true to his values. Washington was not in to for the power but for the greater good of the American people. Washington was also diligent when it come to New York campaign of 1776. The enemies surrounded Washington and his men and with careful planning he made the ultimate decision. Washington had flatboats reserved nearby and this is how 9,000 troops masked behind a fog could return back home to their families. The diligence of Washington shows that a lot of thought and meaningful debate go into his planning. He is carful with his planning because he wants to the U.S to succeed and wants his troops to be able to go back home to their family after battles. Washington is not only looking out for the United States, but for the men that fought to make this country what it is today. Purity in Washington was also a huge characteristic of his. Washington heard of the Newburgh Conspiracy and was asking what were these writer’s views and how could they be a foe? Washington took matters into his own hands and said, “I have not only grown gray, but almost blind in service to my country.” With …show more content…
these words, he was saying he has been through wars and has served his country. The writers heard what he said and the end they returned to writing positive things about their leader. Washington could have done away with the paper internally, but he showed purity instead. In this 2020 election and with these facts I would reelect George Washington. Andrew Jackson was born into poverty on March 15,1767.
The Indian Removal Act was one of Jackson’s ideas and it failed completely. Jackson was for the removal of the Cherokee Indians in Georgia, but the Supreme court denied his request. Georgia knowing the ruling of the Supreme Court still removed the Indians tribes and over 4,000 of them died. Jackson did not understand their beliefs, culture, way of living and was not going to try too. He knew there was a federal Indian act protecting their land and he went over the Supreme Court’s head and did not stop their removal. Jackson was not head-strong due to him ignoring Georgia as they removed the Indians and knowing the law of his country. A head-strong president would have followed the laws of the Founding Fathers and took charge. The sacrificing of Jackson was when small amounts of Georgian land that belongs to the Indians were given to white working men for cotton to better the country. Jackson was selfish when it came to money and controlling the country. He did not want what was better for the American people, but for
himself. Abraham Lincoln was born February 12, 1809 in Kentucky. Lincoln was not an understanding man when it came to State’s Rights. Lincoln said that the Union was not accidently but made up in his own imagination. He said that since the southern states thought having slaves were better for the economic and they wanted out he could declare war on them. The Founding Fathers said, “keep it small, keep it diversified,” they were saying that this country was built on freedom not over a dictator. The head-strong Lincoln was not in a good way. Lincoln was to head-strong by overgoing the Constitution of the United States and the Father said they feared the one who exercised absolute power. When it comes to sacrificing Lincoln also fought for the U.S as well. The positives and negatives for the three candidates have been appointed and here is way Washington would be another great president. Andrew Jackson was a nonunderstanding man and wanted to follow what laws he wanted to follow instead of what the Founding Father had done. Jackson was a selfish man who only cared for what made him look good and who better the ones who was for him. He was a man who would sacrifice to better himself instead of the American people. Jackson had an approval rate of 49%. Abraham Lincoln was not going to let others run over him so he declared war on the South and lost many troops. He was too head-strong and he did not follow the Constitution as it was written. The only positive thing about Lincoln was he served his country as Washington did. The approval rating for Lincoln was 85%. Washington was a man of honesty, diligence, and purity. Washington saw this country as his own and fought for the rights we have today. George Washington had many accomplishments in his career as president. Washington lead the troops of the Revolutionary War to freedom from Britain. He also remained claim in the New York campaign in 1776 and saved over 9,000 troops lives. On Christmas Day, he leads troops over a frozen river to defeat the Hessians. He was not power hunger and he stayed true to his beliefs through his term. Washington was willing to sacrifice his own life for the good of this country and this make him an amazing candidate for the 2020 election! The United States need a president who is understanding, head-strong, and willing to sacrifice for the American people. The presidential seat is the one who handles national affairs, has higher power, and holds the United States in his or her hands. The president of the U.S keeps the peace though-out the world and this is way we have stableness. The greater good of the American people would be in great hands if George Washington was reelected for the 2020 election because, he is honest, diligent, and pure.
Throughout Jackson's two terms as President, Jackson used his power unjustly. As a man from the Frontier State of Tennessee and a leader in the Indian wars, Jackson loathed the Native Americans. Keeping with consistency, Jackson found a way to use his power incorrectly to eliminate the Native Americans. In May 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act. This act required all tribes east of the Mississippi River to leave their lands and travel to reservations in the Oklahoma Territory on the Great Plains. This was done because of the pressure of white settlers who wanted to take over the lands on which the Indians had lived. The white settlers were already emigrating to the Union, or America. The East Coast was burdened with new settlers and becoming vastly populated. President Andrew Jackson and the government had to find a way to move people to the West to make room. In 1830, a new state law said that the Cherokees would be under the jurisdiction of state rather than federal law. This meant that the Indians now had little, if any, protection against the white settlers that desired their land. However, when the Cherokees brought their case to the Supreme Court, they were told that they could not sue on the basis that they were not a foreign nation. In 1832, though, on appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokees were a "domestic dependent nation," and therefore, eligible to receive federal protection against the state. However, Jackson essentially overruled the decision. By this, Jackson implied that he had more power than anyone else did and he could enforce the bill himself. This is yet another way in which Jackson abused his presidential power in order to produce a favorable result that complied with his own beliefs. The Indian Removal Act forced all Indians tribes be moved west of the Mississippi River. The Choctaw was the first tribe to leave from the southeast.
Born March 15, 1767 on the Carolina frontier, Andrew Jackson would eventually rise from poverty to politics after the War of 1812 where he earned national fame as a military hero. Jackson won the popular vote in the 1829 election and became the seventh United States President. As President, Jackson sought out to be a representative of the common man. Jackson remarks in his veto message of July 10, 1832 that, “It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes.” Andrew Jackson put in place the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This act forced Natives off their homelands and onto the lands west of the Mississippi River. They encountered a journey, called the Trail of Tears, where they traveled by foot to what would be their new homes, which transformed the lives of thousands of Native Americans. The President’s intentions were to move all Natives west of the Mississippi River to open up the land to American settlers.
Washington's selection to be the leader of the Continental Army was the wisest choice that the newly formed Continental Congress could have made. Washington's selection as Commander of the Continental Army did more to win the Revolutionary war than any other decision made during the conflict. His personal character epitomizes perfectly the five traits required in a successful general: wisdom, sincerity, humanity, courage, and strictness. (Sun Tzu p. 65) These five crucial traits will become apparent and Washington's strategy to win the War of Independence is elaborated on further
Washington understood that what lies ahead would be difficult, considering he would be facing the most powerful country in the world. But he probably didn't expect his worst problems to come from his own army, which was an undisciplined and untrained group that would eventually tamper with his great patience. Through it all, he would stay determined and always try to stay one step ahead of the enemy. In the summer of 1775, the Americans prepared to attack the British in Boston. But Washington was informed that they were shorthanded on gunpowder.
One reason why Andrew Jackson was not democratic was because of his mistreatment of the Native American. Today, the population of Native Americans are significantly less than when Jackson served as the leader of the free world. From the early 1830’s until 1840, Jackson forced 5 separate Indian tribes onto a small piece of land (Doc L). A likely reason for this sudden move
President Andrew Jackson was a very controversial man. At times, he fights for the common man with a clear head and a sharp mouth, but at others, his rage blinds him from what is truly happening around him. Nevertheless, he fought valiantly for keeping the Union together and for the ordinary citizen's rights as an American. The "black mark" of his presidency was the forced relocation of Native American peoples, from lands which they had live for many generations. Andrew Jackson was a living oxymoron. As James Patron wrote in Jackson's biography, Jackson was "the most law-defying, law-obeying citizen. A stickler for discipline, he never hesitated to disobey his superior."
The removal of the Native Americans was an egocentric move on Jackson’s part. Jackson was only able to see how our removal would benefit the government but was not concerned at all about our values and culture. “It puts an end to all possible danger of collision between the authorities of the general and state governments on account of the Indians” (91). This statement, included in the State of the Union Address, exhibits how Jackson was quick to place blame on the Indians. He was basically saying that if there were any disputes between the general and state governments, it would be because of the Indian’s choice to not leave the land. Jackson was attempting to hold the Indians accountable for a matter that they had no say in. It is evident that Jackson could have are less about the Indian’s home land, where we were birthed and raised our kids. It is clear that the sentimental value of the land did not concern Jackson at all. Jackson felt that he offered us an equitable exchange, but his family was not the one being forcefully removed from their birthland to go to an unfamiliar land. “What good m...
He suffered from stage fright and often “blushed and faltered”, (18) even at his inauguration as President, “he trembled and several times could scarce make out to read his speech” (18) This weakness of his is often glossed over as it doesn’t seem to fit in with his image as the towering, imposing “founding father”. Yet today, it is essential for a President to be able to deliver impressive and clear speeches to the whole country. Finally there are some criticisms that he was not as effective General as is often believed. Thomas Paine claimed that he was a bad general whose strategy consisted of “doing nothing” (19). Although Paine had a personal agenda in condemning George Washington as he resented not being appointed Postmaster-General, and then later by not being rescued from French persecution by the government, it is true that George Washington did lose more battles than he won (20) and often did seem to do nothing for long periods of time. There is also the issue of his harsh treatment towards his own soldiers, any who were caught deserting or plundering were “flogged” (21) and he even a “Gallows near forty feet high erected” to terrify the rest into obedience.
He was the first president to be born in a log cabin, to be an orphan by the age of fifteen, and to be hardened by decades of military campaigns (195). In his first term he exercised the use of veto power more than all previous presidents combined (196). He ran the government the same way he ran his army (196). Andrew Jackson resolved the issue of breaking up the Union and was able to postpone it for another 30 years (197). He also moved all of the United States deposits from the Second National Bank and put them into state and local banks (198). Another thing he did while in office was to begin to move the Indians to Oklahoma (199). In 1830, the General Removal Act was passed (199). The next act passed was the Removal Act against the Choctaws (200). By 1833 nearly 11,000 were removed, and in 1838 nearly all Chickasaws were removed (200). In December 1985 the Cherokee Nation signed a treaty to move west, and in 1838 they walked the Trail of Tears, where 4,000 out of 18,000 died (201). Andrew Jackson’s policies moved 45,690 Indians across the Mississippi (201). This was his most controversial legacy
Some of these individual efforts worsened the outcome for the whole tribe. Jackson’s manipulative ways of handling this situation in office and out of office forced the Cherokee to make hard decisions, and I feel like these decision makers for the Cherokee failed miserably. The reason behind the lack of attack on Jackson is quite obvious, politicians have been acting like politicians well since the very beginning. As selfish and egocentric as his view was, he knew what the was going to do, and being president of this powerful nation not much any one nation could do to stop him let alone the nation of a tribe.
...The Indian Removal Act was all a part of Jackson’s expansion process, and he would stop at nothing until America made the most of its land.
The Indian removal was so important to Jackson that he went back to Tennessee to have the first negotiations in person. He gave the Indians a couple simple alternatives. Alternatives like to submit to state authority, or migrate beyond the Mississippi. Jackson Offered generous aid on one hand and while holding the threat of subjugation in the other. The Chickasaws and Choctaws submitted quickly. The only tribe that resisted until the end was the Cherokees. President Jackson’s presidency was tarnished by the way the U.S. government handled the Native Americans. Although financially, and economically Jackson truly was a good leader, some people view him in a negative way because of the “Indian Removal Act.”
For example, as previously stated, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled against the Cherokee Indians getting removed from their land and forced into present day Oklahoma. Andrew Jackson used his presidential power to overrule on this decision. He removed the Cherokee Indians and sent them on the devastating Trail of Tears, all the while claiming he was looking out for their best interest. Andrew Jackson abused his vetoing power, making use of it more than all the previous presidents combined. This showed his inability to listen to his advisors and to other prominent political figures, a trait very important in a president. In this way, President Jackson exploits his power and authority. Jackson was given the power designated to a president and he truly did use that power, albeit irresponsibly, to the fullest of his ability. By overusing his power, Jackson profoundly showed the characteristics of a democratic
Unlike Obama, George Washington told the Congress it was too much for the president to change partisan polarization which is the cases in which an individual's stance on a given issue, policy, or person is more likely to be strictly defined by their identification with a particular political party. Washington's speech was for the citizens of the Congress. Additionally, his speech talked more about fairness and how there should be no no separate views or local prejejuices. The fourth paragraph states, “There are similar bonds between duty and advantage, and between an honest and generous policy, and the solid rewards of public prosperity and happiness.” This quote explains what honesty and fairness does in his eyes. George Washington goes on more about never giving up and controlling the country in a positive way. Washington talks about how proud he would be to lead this country and he will be president with no reward because he loved it so much. He states in his last paragraph, “I was first honored with a call into the Service of my Country, then on the eve of a difficult struggle for its liberties, the way in which I contemplated my duty required that I should refuse any financial payment. I have in no way changed my determination about this. And as I still have the same point of view which produced this
An effective president is one who gets the jobs done under all types of measures. In order to take care of the United States I believe a person has to be a little conniving as well. George Washington was the best Chief Executive that understood that his every action would set a precedent for future administrations and that his mistakes could hurt the young United States. Washington succeeded in setting a dignified yet unpretentious tone for the presidency. Washington saw the need to establish the primacy of the federal government over the states. He established the rule that presidents seek the advice and consent of the Senate not before or during negotiations, but only after a treaty had made.