Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The power of literary analysis
The power of literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As adults, the perception of a child is one very different from our own. The perception we have from the situations we have experienced and the upbringing we have endured also differ vastly. This is very apparent in the story “What Liesel Thinks of Horses”. The perceptions of the things an individual holds dear may not be what others see and in the eyes of a child with a unique life this is more apparent than ever.
The struggle Liesel faces when regarding horses is a momentous one that she must debate thoroughly throughout the story. Her idea of a horse has been manipulated and distorted through the stories she has heard from others about their own experiences. Only having other people’s experiences to base her opinion off of and none of her
…show more content…
own makes the decision rough. Her perception is only through the eyes of others of most of what the world is about and if she struggles so ferociously with the idea of whether or not she likes horses imagine how she must take on other hard decisions. However, she has made some decision before but mostly based off of what others do and say. Her perception of horses as I said is a struggle that stems from the experiences of others.
She does not want to like horses because they have hurt two of the few people around her. We are aware of Katie’s incident with horses when Liesel reflects, “Katie’s hand is scarred all over, from a horse bite” (Ruskovich 168). And, we learn Pig Iron had his struggles when Liesel mentions, “Pig Iron got bucked off and got his ankles crushed. Then he had to go and marry Ruth” (Ruskovich 170). However, there are good things about horses that she learns from others. Like Pig Iron and his horse Candy who he loved dearly. Also, Liesel takes particular interest in the girls at school who like horses and all of the qualities that they seem to share and notices she shares very few qualities with them but still enjoys drawing horses and thinking about them. She also knows deep down she would trade her dog just to own a pony. This whole inner debate about horses makes it very clear that something so small, such as an opinion of horses, can be so important from the perception of a …show more content…
child. She has made decisions before about various people and objects much more easily than with horses because the stories she has heard are not as diverse in viewpoints. Such as her opinion of Ellis. All she knows about this man is that he tried to hurt her friend Pig Iron and now he lives somewhere out in the unknown with a chunk bitten out of his arm. She does not like him and is afraid of him because of the one thing she’s knows about him. I believe as a child she has this perception of him so easily, because she does not think to contemplate all the other aspects of the story or of this man’s life. He did one thing she did not like and now she does not like him. She also has a strong opinion of Cora, Katie’s best friend, we know this from when she remembers looking through bracelets of Katie’s to find the hair Cora promised was woven into them and when she does not find them decides, “She feels disgust at the thought of Cora. This is a secret she will keep” (Ruskovich 171). This one thing she knows about her is what determines her perception of her and that is all she thinks of her. Although, she does some snooping to come to her conclusion about Cora she still comes to her decision despite whether she truly knows the person and their situation or not. Death is a reoccurring theme in her thoughts throughout the story.
The first time we see this we read, “But Liesel can’t picture the dead girl any other way, and she can’t look at Katie without thinking of the dead girl” (Ruskovich 168). She thinks about this and the fact that she does not know this person however she must put a face to her and when doing so almost convinces herself this person is Katie or is not her own person at all. Then, we see an occurrence of death again with this line, “Then she sees, on a golden chain around his neck . . . the bent nail that killed Candy, the horse that he loved most” (Ruskovich 169). The reflection of the death of the horse not only reveals to us more of Liesel’s mixed emotions about horses but also gives us better insight to her perception of Pig Iron and his experiences in relation to her own. Then, to add to our knowledge of Pig Iron and their relationship with one another she reflects “a little wooden camel that she found by Joe’s grave—Pig Iron’s son’s grave” (Ruskovich 171). Then, she thinks about his dead son and reflects, “She is pretty sure that Joe grew up. Joe lives in the Back Woods, too. He’s got a wife. Was it their kid who died then? She tries to remember better . . . but the boy eating moths is the only way that she can picture it” (Ruskovich 171). Once, again she is considering death and is second guessing herself on the reality of it. She then thinks about herself and her own death whether the people surrounding
her will care or not and if Piranha, Pig Iron’s dog, will eat her body or not. A child’s perception of death is clearly different from an adult point of view because their knowledge and view of the world is much smaller so they may question deaths existence all together such as Liesel has. They also contemplate very imaginative questions such as if a dog would eat her body, but ignore the very common obvious concerns like if her mother will be okay or if she will be upset or miss her. Her perception as a child in her own unique situation is different than that of an adults in a different situation, because her perception as a child greatly influences her focus on the small things in life. She focuses on how a Sunday feels to her as compared to a Saturday or a weekday. Many adults may not think about the days like this. We are busy with our lives, our tasks, and our responsibilities and may not have the time to think about what day it is at all, none the less exactly how it feels to experience that particular day. She also focuses on spelling and specifically teaching the spelling of the longest word in the alphabet. She finds this to be so important and even thinks it will be the key to unlock everything for Pig Iron even if it is not actually important to anyone else. Katie even states, “You know he can read, right?” (Ruskovich 172). Letting Liesel know she is not really influencing anything. Dwelling on small things like how Sunday feels, or spelling a long word, or lipstick, or hair in bracelets is something that it seems children tend to do much more than adults. Her perception of these small things is so much more acute and important as opposed to the things that adults think about in their daily lives. We must think about food, bills, errands, our jobs, and so on and do not have time for these seemingly insignificant details. This I think, the very small details, are what separates the perception that children have of the world from that of an adults. We see this when Katie is blunt about the reality of Liesel’s spelling lessons, when her mother must take the phone call she has received and become preoccupied with this task, and when Pig Iron can’t always just play pretend with a little girl, he must also struggle with his internal problems and defend his wife. Liesel just sees things from her narrower, childlike, and somewhat self-centered perspective and that can’t always be the case for adults. At the end of the story she decides that she must make a choice. She must choose what perception she has and what she really feels and thinks about horses. Overall though, she must realize that many decisions will be made in life and they will be difficult ones and her perception as a child must transition into that of an adult. I think she is beginning to see this and make changes accordingly. My reason for this is based in her final statement and decision on what she thinks of horses when she exclaims “Horses! . . . Are basically! . . . Elk” (Ruskovich 175). This means that she has made a decision of what she thinks based off of her own experiences and prior knowledge rather than basing off of the experiences of others. This is because she has already formed her own opinion of elk. She makes this clear in these thoughts, “Liesel doesn’t like elk. She doesn’t like the word “elk.” She doesn’t like how elk look. She basically thinks that elk are creeps” (Ruskovich 167). These feelings may also be influenced by the fact that the only gift her father ever gave her has images of elk on it. This could easily give her a reason to dislike them. So, therefor she has made a decision about elks based on her own experience with her father and personal impression of an elk. She decides that making a decision about horses should be based off of how she feels and what she experiences. The answer is simple because she has decided to make it a simple decision and this shows her transition from a childlike perception into a different one. Therefore, showing the contrast between a child’s unique perception and a changing, maturing one.
Throughout the novel Liesel reaches new highs and new lows, overcoming her fears and succumbing to her anger. Liesel's sudden outburst at Ilsa Hermann after Ilsa asking to stop the laundry services caused her to finally accept her brother's death and even helped Ilsa accept her son's death as well. Ilsa's guilt consumed her and caused her to become a house ridden woman overcome by her grief while Liesel overcame her guilt and grief by learning how to read and write not allowing them to overcome her. "“It’s about time,” she [Liesel] informed her, “that you do your own stinking washing anyway. It’s about time you faced the fact that your son is dead. He got killed! He got strangled and cut up more than twenty years ago! Or did he freeze to death? Either way, he’s dead! He’s dead and it’s pathetic that you sit here shivering in your own house to suffer for it. You think you’re the only one?” Immediately. Her brother was next to her. He whispered for her to stop, but he, too, was dead, and not worth listening to. He died in a train. They buried him in the snow. […] “This book,” she went on. She shoved the boy down the steps, making him fall. “I don’t want it.” The words were quieter now, but still just as hot. She threw The Whistler at the woman’s slippered feet, hearing the clack of it as it landed on the cement. “I don’t want your miserable book. ”[…] her brother holding his
...escribable sadness that lurks in the air around them. The way the young child will not be satisfied sends his father into a frustrated resentment of modern society. People take too much for granted in a place of hope, privileges, and freedom while war drags on in another country, ten thousand miles away. The appreciation of youthful innocence is thus juxtaposed with selfishness and an inability to be satisfied, which seems to create a double tone that creates a contrast about the reality of humanity. Sometimes we can never be content with what we have until something is lost or sacrificed. In youth and innocence, satisfaction and the appreciation of the world around us seem to come more easily, perhaps because life has not yet been tainted by greed. It may be part of human nature that, as one grows, his desires become more complex and thus more difficult to satiate.
The Mother is among a family of four who lives on a small farm and takes immense pride in what interests her, however her passion does not particularly lie in her two children; James and David; nor in her husband and their interests; but instead lies within her chickens. Though chickens bring the most joy to the Mother, they are not the sole animals that live on the farm. The animal that draws the most interest from the father, James and David is their horse, Scott. At a young age, Scott was used as a working mule for the family and grew up alongside the Father and two Sons. To the father, Scott was like one of his own sons, and to James and David, Scott was like their brother; but according to the Mother, “He’s been worthless these last few years”(Macleod, 267). Ever since Scott was young, he was a burden on the Mother’s lifestyle; she never took a liking to the horse even when he served as a source of profit for the family. The Mother had never appreciated the sentimental value that Scott possessed because he had never been a particular interest to her. Once Scott had aged and was no longer able...
The justification that Mikolka gives for killing the horse is that she is unable to fulfill her role to contribute to society. He describes her uselessness by saying, “This brute, mates, is just breaking my heart, I feel as if I could kill her. She’s just eating her head off” (46). Mikolka feels apathetic towards the life of the horse. It represents Rodia’s belief that killing the pawnbroker is not a crime but merely an act that is justified and shows his loss of value for human life. In contrast, the little boy represents his affectionate side. The boy shows immediate emotion to the violent beating. His compassionate heart does not understand why the blameless soul is being killed. Through his perspective, the mare’s life still has significance and he views Mikolka as a murderer. Both sides do represent Rodia’s thoughts, however as he awoke by “gasping for breath [and] his hair soaked with perspiration” reveals that Rodia himself is terrified by Mikolka’s actions and subconsciously rejects that aspect. Thus, Rodia naturally embraces more of the good natured thoughts in his
In John Connolly’s novel, The Book of Lost Things, he writes, “for in every adult there dwells the child that was, and in every child there lies the adult that will be”. Does one’s childhood truly have an effect on the person one someday becomes? In Jeannette Walls’ memoir The Glass Castle and Khaled Hosseini’s novel The Kite Runner, this question is tackled through the recounting of Jeannette and Amir’s childhoods from the perspectives of their older, more developed selves. In the novels, an emphasis is placed on the dynamics of the relationships Jeannette and Amir have with their fathers while growing up, and the effects that these relations have on the people they each become. The environment to which they are both exposed as children is also described, and proves to have an influence on the characteristics of Jeannette and Amir’s adult personalities. Finally, through the journeys of other people in Jeannette and Amir’s lives, it is demonstrated that the sustainment of traumatic experiences as a child also has a large influence on the development of one’s character while become an adult. Therefore, through the analysis of the effects of these factors on various characters’ development, it is proven that the experiences and realities that one endures as a child ultimately shape one’s identity in the future.
...en-year-old girl”. She has now changed mentally into “someone much older”. The loss of her beloved brother means “nothing [will] ever be the same again, for her, for her family, for her brother”. She is losing her “happy” character, and now has a “viole[nt]” personality, that “[is] new to her”. A child losing its family causes a loss of innocence.
Fellow classmates in Liesel’s class mock her because she didn’t read the passage he was instructed to read. This shows Liesel experiences unhappiness because of her lack of reading and the power of words.
These revelations usually involve the acquisition of knowledge--the sort of knowledge we frequently already possess, but pretend that we don't: parents have lives entirely secret from their children; there is a point beyond which damaged love cannot be repaired; people use other people even when (and as) they love them.The families in these stories create stories of their own, stories about who and what they are as entities--stories which are often at odds with reality, but which help them to deal with the disappointments and tragedies of that reality.Clearly, the title's allusion to Hansel and Gretel invites reading these as stories of innocence lost; and most of the reviews of this oft-reviewed and much-praised collection (it was short listed for the 1995 Pen-Faulkner award) make much of this connection.But these are also stories of the terrifying darkness of adult responsibilities recognized and faced, though not always triumphantly.
Children have often been viewed as innocent and innocent may be a nicer way to call children naive. Since children’s lives are so worry free they lack the knowledge of how to transition from being a child to becoming an adolescent. Their lack of knowledge may be a large part of their difficulties growing up, which could be a few rough years for many. In books like the boy in the striped pajamas the story is told from the point of view of a little boy, this way we get a full view of how innocent he is. In this book the writer shows the reader first hand how a child viewed the holocaust and how his innocence cost him his life. Then in books like the perks of being a wallflower Charlie is a teen whom is struggling with the transition from being a child to becoming an adolescent. In this book the writer gives a first hand look at how difficult it can be to transition into an adolescent. Charlie has many difficulties in this book; he is in search of his identity and how to fit in.
In the essay: “ ‘Cinderella’: A Story of Sibling Rivalry and Oedipal Conflicts”’, Bruno Bettelheim discusses how Cinderella is a story about the difficulties of sibling rivalry and the degraded heroine ending up on top of the siblings that oppressed her. Bettelheim argues that sibling rivalry is created when a child feels that they cannot win their parents love and esteem in comparison to his brothers or sisters. In addition he argues that every child feels that they deserve to be degraded at some point in their life. The concept of Oedipal guilt, his last point, has some intriguing details included in it, concepts of which could be disputed. However, the main focus of this essay is on how children justify the idea that they should be degraded, and because of the hardships they have faced, risen up and exalted like Cinderella was. He states that Cinderella relates very closely to the youth because they feel like they can relate to her situation more than the majority of people could.
In literature, it is important to investigate the smallest of things, but it is also imperative to see the bigger picture. Our text states: “The farce ends with bitter irony, showing the hopelessness of its defeated characters against the legalistic precision and economic forces Flem represents” (Puchner 374). Without one character or the other, the whole story would fall apart and would not make much sense. Flem, the narrator, and everyone down to the horses are key for making “Spotted Horses” what it
Throughout Baby’s life she has experienced many cases where she has lost her innocence. Baby is young enough to bring her dolls around in a vinyl suitcase, yet old enough to experience more than she should about the world’s hardships. Baby and Jules had a lot of misfortunes in their life, and Baby’s vulnerability contributes to her misfortune, in being unable to differentiate between right and wrong, due to her desire to be loved; which Jules always failed to show her. There are many reasons why young adults feel the need to grow up fast in the adulthood world but in the end it’s not worth it. The childhood stage is overlooked and that’s the most important stage of life that young adults should cherish, because you only live through it once.
Hester, Paul’s rocking horse and the whispering of the house represent greed, selfishness, and love. They also reveal the character’s real feelings and thoughts of neglect, detachment, greed and selfishness. These symbols convey a theme and make the characters in the short story. The Rocking-Horse Winner is a tragic story where Paul dies trying to gain his mother’s love and compassion. The mother was just interested in the money he was winning in the derbies. The story conveys a major them of materialism and shapes the characters through the symbols.
“Now suppose you had a little colt, and you were your own mother to that little colt… And all of the sudden that same little colt went and died… You’d be sorry, wouldn’t you?” When dealing with death, an individual is encompassed with all kinds of feelings and emotions. Depression, denial, and guilt are all the components of mourning through death. This quote, relates to the thought that everything one experiences is associated with their environment. Iona and the mare experience two different environments. For Iona, it’s adjusting to a life without his son. The little mare lives a life away from the farms in a gloomy city. Iona places the little mare in a similar scenario he’s in, as if she can respond. Although she can’t, the horse’s compassion is visible once again. “The little mare munches, listens, and breathers on her master’s hands.” The healing power of the mare was the key to easing Iona’s suffering. When Iona couldn’t find a sense of closure through the communication with human beings he finally opens his eyes to realize the one listener he had, was his little white mare. He pours his sorrows out to her and not only did she show compassion by hearing his every word, she physically comforts him. The little breath on his hand represents the transfer of warmth from the mare to Iona on a cold winter day. Even though she’s restricted to what she can do, at the end
In the eyes of a child, there is joy, there is laughter. But as time ages us, as soon as we flowered and became grown-ups the child inside us all fades that we forget that once, we were a child.