Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about moral dilemma
Now and then character analysis
Essays about moral dilemma
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This concept of control and omnipotence is what leads to Ferdinand and the Cardinal seeking to control the Duchess, their Eve. According to the Daily Walk Bible (NIV), God only gives Adam one specific edict to follow. He tells Adam, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die” (Gen. 2.16-17). This command is then passed along from Adam to Eve after she is created. The crux of story happens when Eve encounters the snake in the garden. The snake convinces Eve to eat the fruit from the forbidden tree, and she then offers it to Adam who eats it. They become aware of of their nakedness and hide from God. When God finds out, he asks them who told them they were naked, and “The man said, ‘The woman you put here with me …show more content…
- she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it” (Gen.3.12). According to the myth, God says to Eve “What is this you have done?” and the blame is sufficiently transferred from the man to the woman. In the myth, both woman and man is punished; however, Eve’s punishment, in addition to having painful childbirth, is to be ruled by her husband. When examining the brother’s need to play God in their sister’s life, the complex becomes more apparent. For Ferdinand and the Cardinal, the Duchess becomes their Eve. She is their innocent, chaste sister that has free reign in her own Eden. She is free to conduct herself as she pleases, but her brothers give her one edict, like God gave Adam and Eve in the garden: Do not get married. To be specific, the brothers do not want her to marry any man that they have not hand chosen for her. Many critics have discussed the Duchess position as an unmarried woman. (INSERT CRITICS HERE) Any other man would be a forbidden tree for the Duchess. While the brother’s also specify that she should not be loose and have sex, they explicitly tell her not to get married because they cannot fully conceive of their sister having sex outside of marriage. However, soon after Ferdinand and the Cardinal leave, the Duchess meets with Antonio, and the Duchess offers him her wedding ring. This scene is very symbolic, because it is one of two scenes where the Duchess can be seen offering Antonio forbidden fruit. After Antonio gives his speech about the importance of having children, the Duchess responds: Duchess: Fie, fie, what’s all this? One of your eyes is bloodshot; use my ring to’t, They say ‘tis very sovereign; ‘twas my wedding ring, And I did vow never to part with it, But to my second husband. (I.i.394-397) By offering Antonio her ring, she explicitly states that she will only part with this ring to her second husband, and when Antonio accepts it, he accepts her proposal of marriage, and the metaphorical forbidden fruit just as Adam did in the creation tale. Following this metaphorical offering, the Duchess later offers Antonio literal fruit. In act one, Ferdinand employs Bosola to be his intelligencer. In order to ensure that Bosola will perform the duties for him, Ferdinand arranges for Bosola to work as the provisorship of her horse, neatly ensuring that Bosola would feel indebted to him. Jones says that tatics like this stem from the fear of castrion. Jones explains that “the idea of castration always plays with our type a part of quite special importance, both in the form of castration-wishes against the father (authorities) and of fear of castration (talion) on the part of the younger generation. The later is more pronounced of the two, and naturally leads to a fear and jealous of younger rivals, this being in some cases remarkably intense” (261). According to the article, this characteristic leads to a seemingly contradictory trait which is their “desire to protect,” which entails “acting as a patron or guardian, and so on. All this, however, happens only under the strict condition that the person to be protected acknowledges his helpless position and appeals to them as the weak to the strong” (262). While these two may seem contradictory, it functions to help the afflicted male maintain the feeling that he is more powerful than those that he controls. The reader may not know whether or not Bosola is younger than Ferdinand, but Bosola is considered a great soldier. Also, Bosola is not awed by Ferdinand or the Cardinal, therefore not susceptible to bend Ferdinand’s authority without cause. Ferdinand therefore may feel as though his power has been castrated, and as a result he creates a situation where he acts as a patron to Bosola, and provides him with work, as long as he submits to his terms. When Bosola realizes what Ferdinand has done, Bosola frequently refers o him as a devil, saying “take your devils, which hell calls angels. These cursed gifts would make/ You a corrupter, me an impudent traitor,/ And should I take these they’d take me to hell” (I.i.255-257). Stuck between ungrateful, and a traitor, Bosola takes the job. While working as Ferdinand’s intelligencer, he notices how the Duchess: Is sick o’ days, she pukes, her stomach seethes, The fins of her eyes look most teeming blue, She wanes i’th’ cheek, and waxes fat i’th’ flank; And, contrary to our Italian fashion, Wears a loose-bodies gown; there’s somewhat in’t. (II.i.60-64). Suspecting that the Duchess is pregnant, he devises a plan to offer her an apricot. This scene mimics that snake encouraging Eve to eat the forbidden fruit. After the Duchess tastes the fruit, Bosola tells her he wishes she would have pared the fruit because it was grown out of horse dung. No believing him, the Duchess replies that he is joking and says to Antonio, “ You shall judge; pray taste one” (II.i.133). However, Antonio rejects the fruit. While he doe accept the marriage that the Duchess offers him, the metaphorical fruit, he rejects the literal fruit, which leads Bosola to figure out that the Duchess is pregnant. When Ferdinand learns that the Duchess has had a child, he does not know that she is also married, and he flies into a rage.
He immediately judges his sister to be a “notorious strumpet” (II.v.3). In Ferdinand’s mind, she has broken the edict of his garden, though her body and her land belong to her, and he says that he has “to purge infected blood, such blood as hers” (II.v.26). This is another instance of Ferdinand’s God complex. In relation to judging, Jones states that “it is a double one, consisting of an alternation of extreme tolerance and extreme intolerance. The question of which of the two is shown seems to depend on whether the infringement to be judge is of their own will or merely of that of other people. In the former case no punishment is too harsh for the offender...in the second case, on the other hand, they are always in favour of the greatest leniency and broad- minded tolerance” (260). Ferdinand believes that his sister has violated his direct authority, so he issues the harshest sentence that he can impose, death. Ferdinand decides to become a law within himself, and in his mind, he plays judge, jury, and
executioner. Two years and two children later, Ferdinand finally decides to confront the Duchess. When he arrives to her court, the Duchess does not know that he knows that she has children, and she continues to pretend that she is not married. This mimics Adam and Eve hiding from God after they have eaten the fruit. They attempted to hide their sin, though God is all omniscient and omnipotent. By continuing to pretend to defer to her brother out of respect, the Duchess is unknowingly fueling Ferdinand’s delusion that he is a God, and unwittingly help him sink deeper into his madness. This scene comes to its climax when Ferdinand enters the Duchess’s bedroom and hears her telling Antonio, who has hidden himself as a joke, that her brothers may catch him in her room sleeping, and that “[he] shall get no more children till [her] / consent to be [his] gossips” (III.ii.67-68). When she turns and notices that Ferdinand is behind her with a poniard, she immediately recognizes her brother may have murderous intent, and she informs him that she will accept whatever the outcome is with dignity. Ferdinand replies “ Die then, quickly./ Virtue, where art thou hid? What hideous thing/ Is it that doth eclipse thee?” (III.ii.71-72). This line is reminiscent of God’s calling to Adam and Eve in the garden. This deviation from the creation myth illustrates reveals the difference between Adam and Eve and the Duchess and Antonio. Adam and Eve disobeyed God, the higher power that created them. the Duchess disobeyed her brother, who is human. While God does wield absolute power, Ferdinand does not, yet he has attempted to perform this role in his sister’s life. While the patriarchal system does imbue him with some power as a duke, he is not all power because he is a human. In reality, the Duke does not have the power to control his sister’s will, nor the authority to pass down dictates.
King Ferdinand and Isabella are known as one of the most famous couples in the world. Isabella who was the daughter of King John II of Castile and Ferdinand was the son of King John I of Aragon were married to create unity between the two kingdoms. At the time of their marriage the spanish moors were in control of a big chunk of Spain.
Chastisement or punishment can be performed in various forms that can produce in a variety of consequences. In J.B., the sudden punishment of God on J.B has caused a commotion in his family physically and mentally. Nevertheless, J.B’s faith does not die and he also continues to fulfill his responsibility as a “puppet” in a play created by God. After the death of his five children, J.B is placid and not abhorring God for his punishment. “God will not punish without cause, God is just.”, said J.B (109). J.B knows that there must be a reason for God to punish him, because God always acts impartially. Ev...
In the designated chronology of the First World War, the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo is widely accepted as the spark that caused the war. However, that explanation fails to consider the long-term factors in the years before the Great War. The assassination of political figures has happened many times throughout history and no wars have been started over them, yet many people believe that the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo by itself was the initial cause of the first major war of the 20th century. But if you think about it, why would the murder of an Austrian, in Bosnia, by a Serbian, have the impact that it did? It doesn’t make complete sense; the United States didn’t issue a war against actors when President Lincoln
My explorer is Juan Ponce De Leon. Juan Ponce De Leon was born in a village called Satervás De Compas in the northern part of what is now the Spanish Province of Valladolid in 1460. Juan died in 1521 from a wound he got in battle when ,he was hit by a poisonous
In the short story, “The Old Testament: Genesis,” the Lord God had forbidden Adam from eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat….” (“Genesis” 54). Adam followed the rules, but however the woman that the Lord God created was tricked by the serpent. “Ye shall not surely die...” (“Genesis” 55). This was stated by the serpent, who tricked the woman into eating from the tree. When the serpent told the woman that she would not die, which made her want to eat from the tree more. The woman knew that she was not going to die, so she didn’t listen to what the Lord God told Adam. By being disobedient to Lord God, Adam and the woman had to face consequences. “I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thy shalt bring forth children…” (“Genesis” 55). The Lord God punished the woman and Adam, because they did not listen to his command. This connects to our society today, because many people who are forbidden from doing something follow the rules until that one person tell them something different to break the rule. While breaking this rule, that person will most likely face ...
There is something to be said about quotes. The way the knowledge of achievers is brought down to just a few lines. It gives us a sense of both reflection and wisdom. They are relatable and can guide us to a conclusion of where we are and who we aspire to be. In our quote assignment we are told to choose three quotes from a selection that was posted on the board every week. All of them can be related to my life in some way, shape, or form. However, these are the three that I believe relate to me the best.
The 1500’s was a time better known as the Age of Exploration. Many explorers from Europe came to the New world and one Spanish explorer was named Juan Ponce De Leon. Spain had sent him as form of repayment. He named one of the fifty states in the United States of America. In the 1500’s, or the Age of Discovery, many from Europe explored the New world and resulted in them dying away from home or very slowly, like Juan Ponce de Leon.
In Paradise Lost, one of the differences God is aware of the betrayal his creations unlike Frankenstein. There is a point where Adam desires a companion to share the world with, thus God creates Eve from one of Adam’s ribs. He is in a predicament now, due to there are now two beings to love now, but who deserves the more affection. He “can neither love himself adequately nor love Eve as himself unless have love God adequately – and so make his love for Eve, the unity of their shared self, an expression of that higher love” (Gross 95). This scene displays one of Adam’s limitations of his free will. Thus creating her in being the submissive which eventually became her downfall, Adam’s and the rest of humanity. Eve is flawed, she has the inclination of self-love, a quality she should not be capable of possessing or acting upon. The only love that she should be expressing is her love for Adam in a way also loving God. This becomes their weakness. Satan learns about this weakness and exploits it as his advantage to enact his scheme. He influences a susceptible Eve, by coercing her into eating the fruit from the tree of knowledge. He claims to Eve about the fruit “By the fruit? It gives you life To knowledge by the threat’ner? Look on me, Me, who have touched and tasted; yet both live” (Book 9 l. 686-688). Satan is able to persuade them to consume the fruit that provides them
Ferdinand is intuitively afraid of individuals, crowds and society as a whole. While en route to the colony, Bardamu experiences this fear of others, when he is condemned to death by his fellow passengers, because he is traveling with an inexpensive fare.
If God knows the actions of his creations such as humans before they are done, and God has commands these creations how could they refuse their creator? This is brought up in William Walkers “On Reason, Faith, and Freedom in Paradise Lost”. Walker argues that although God commands Adam and Eve to worship him, ultimately it is their choice to worship him and thus they are employing their free will he writes “I will further argue, does not mean that, in requiring that man have faith in him, Milton 's God is requiring him to do something he is not free to do” (Walker 143). I would disagree with this argument, I believe in this story humankind has no free will. I believe when God made Adam and Eve he gave them the illusion of free will, how could Adam and Eve refuse their creator, especially if their creator made them to worship him. I believe that God knew mankind would worship him before he even before he created them and therefore he has true free will while mankind does
Paine’s situation is different, because the law at his time of writing was the in flux between monarchy and democracy, whereas Brown was writing in the early years of the republic. They both, however, are in favor of letting natural law dictate the laws of the government. The figure that most embodies this is Mrs. Lorimer. Brown writes “her justice was inflexible: She knew full well the incurableness of his depravity; that banishment was the mildest destiny that would befall him; that estrangement from ancient haunts and associates was the condition from which his true friends had least to fear” (46). Mrs. Lorimer’s “inflexible” ideas justice counteracts natural law and results in the estrangement of her beloved brother. Justice as dictated by the state is similarly inflexible and often needlessly punitive, in Paine and Brown’s beliefs. The primary criticism of the use of governmental law over natural law comes when Edgar learns of Clithero’s murder. The former asks, “Shall we impute guilt where there is no design? ...Shall we deem ourselves criminal because we do not enjoy the attributes of deity?” (87). Here, he is questioning if governmental law and natural law should judge the acts themselves or the intent behind them. Edgar believes that Clithero is a good man, and struggles with how to address the acts he’s committed. Another instance of
When God put Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden they were both innocent and good. Eve does not have freedom when being tempted to eat the apple. She made a choice to eat the apple but it was not out of freedom. Adams treatment and Satan 's arguments are both responsible for Eve eating the apple.
Due to not only God’s failure to heal his foot but also his uncle’s actions towards him, Philip decides, in his early ...
The Cardinal and Ferdinand, the brothers of the Duchess, are very much against their sister’s re-marriage. Ferdinand urges her not to marry again. He condemns it because he thinks that it shows a lustful nature.
Because God has created mankind, giving them free will and reason, He wants Adam and Eve to obey his single, simple command expecting that they will follow his order out of love and respect for their creator. Adam warns Eve not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil stating that it serves as "`The only sign of our obedience left / Among so many signs of power and rule / Conferred upon us, and dominion giv'n / Over all other creatures'" (IV. 427-431). God demonstrates his love for mankind, giving Adam and Eve a great amount of authority in the new world, as they have "so many signs of power" and have control over all the other animals on Earth. At this point, because mankind continues to act obediently, submitting to God's will, they receive many rewards from their creator. God makes only a single, straightforward and easy to obey demand that they must not eat from the tree. Not eating the fruit remains "the only sign of our obedience" to God since they have so much power and control on earth. By using the word "only," Milton emphasizes the ease in following God's command since Adam and Eve have just...