What Is Tom Robinson's Perspective In To Kill A Mockingbird

834 Words2 Pages

In Harper Lees “To Kill a Mockingbird”, the ideas of understanding another persons perspective and sociology are examined. This story follows a young girl, Scout Finch, and her older brother Jem growing up in the southern state of Alabama in the 1930’s. The court trial of an innocent black man, Tom robinson, accused of raping a young white woman from a low class family, and the life of Tom’s lawyer- Scout’s father, Atticus Finch, you can view the dramatic development of both Scout and Jem. Characters in To Kill a Mockingbird such as Boo Radley and Tom Robinson’s perspectives are also explored, giving us a insight about how no one ever truly understands a person until they know what what the persons circumstances are. With events such as Scout …show more content…

However, she only believes this because of lack of being able understand different perspectives, and lack of maturity. After the kids are attacked and attempted to be killed by Bob Ewell, a hate crime that is directed to Atticus for shaming him during the court trial, Scout learns the one that has saved both Jem and herself was in fact Boo Radley. While walking Arthur home at the end of the book, she realizes the rumours being spread around about him were false, and he is just a recluse who has gotten his reputation destroyed by his father as revenge for “ruining” his families name when he was younger. These events that partake over the course of the book capture the essence of themes including: acceptance comes with maturity, and things are not always as they appear to …show more content…

Atticus clearly proves within the trial that the case is only word against word, evidence provided is merely circumstantial, and how no one can be fairly convinced in that way. Unfortunately, in this time period, a black mans word always looses to another white mans word, even to Bob Ewells. Even though Atticus presented the court with evidence that Tom physically incapable of beating Mayella in such a way she was beaten, the jury still decided to side with the prosecutors. The dismissal of evidence, and lack of fairness and equality led to the final verdict of the court trial, one of the most highlighted scenes of injustice in To Kill a

Open Document