What Is The Most Appropriate Tort Of Negligence

205 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negligence tort complicated scenarios

The most appropriate tort in which to be applied to this case is the Tort of Negligence, governed under and by the Civil Liability Act 2003. The three elements of negligence consist of whether a duty of care is present, whether the duty of care has been breached and the damages sustained as result. The Tort of Negligence is most fitting in this particular case as the details of the plaintiffs cause of injury and events leading up to the accident, involve negligence. For this particular case, the defendant may bring forward a defence that the plaintiff contributed to the negligence in this particular situation. Meaning Mr Clark contributed to the injuries he sustained as a result of not listening to instructions. Possibly considerably lowering

Show More
Related

  • Perin V. Hayne Case Summary

    1160 Words  | 3 Pages

    “In tort law, the doctrine which holds a defendant guilty of negligence without an actual showing that he or she was negligent. Its use is limited in theory to cases in which the cause of the plaintiff's injury was entirely under the control of the defendant, and the injury presumably could have been caused only by negligence”(Burt, M.A., & Skarin, G.D. (2011). In consideration of this, the defendant argues that the second foundation of this principle should be solely based on common knowledge of the situation. Although, there is a experts testimony tartar is no basis in this case , in the experts testimony or anything else, for indicating that the plaintiffs injury resulted from the negligence of the defendant. The court correctly found the defendant not liable under the Res ipsa

    Read More

  • Case Study of the 4 D's of Negligence

    517 Words  | 2 Pages

    A dentist fits several children with braces. The children are regular patients of the dentist. The results for some of the patients turn out to be unacceptable and damaging. There are children who have developed gum infections due to improperly tightened braces. Some mistakenly had their permanent teeth removed, while others have misaligned bites. A local attorney becomes aware of these incidences, looks further into it, and realizes the dentist has not been properly trained and holds no legal license to practice dentistry or orthodontics. The attorney decides to act on behalf of the displeased patients and files a class action lawsuit. The attorney plans to prove the dentist negligent and guilty of dental malpractice by providing proof using the four D’s of negligence. The four D’s of negligence are duty, dereliction, direct cause and damages.

    Read More

  • tort of negligent investigation

    1025 Words  | 3 Pages

    General speaking, a tort of negligence is a failure of someone or one party to follow a standard of care which means failed to do what a reasonable person do or do what a reasonable personal would not do. From the interest perspective, the tort of negligent investigation is an offence against private interest of an individual, corporation or government due to the negligent investigation. Whether a tort of negligent investigation exists in Canada is related to whether investigators owe a duty of care to person being investigated and what is the standard of care. Finally, a tort of negligent investigation only exist when there is a loss or injury to the suspect and the loss or injury was caused by the negligent investigation.

    Read More

  • Tort Law Case Study

    1259 Words  | 3 Pages

    In a school setting, negligence is the most common of the three torts seen in our courts (Decker, 2011).

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Negligence

    887 Words  | 2 Pages

    George failed to comply with the duty of care, causing his car to roll downhill. According to the authors, negligence occurs when someone suffers an injury or damage to property because of a party’s failure to live up to a required duty of care (Mayer, Warner, Siedel, & Lieberman, 2014, p. 161). Negligence is an unintentional tort that the tortfeasor either wishes to bring consequences of the act or thinks that they will occur (Mayer et al,. 2014, p. 161). For George to be liable for negligence, I will explain the following elements.

    Read More

  • Intentional Tort

    1806 Words  | 4 Pages

    This essay focuses on intentional tort, which includes trespass to person consisting of battery, assault and false imprisonment, which is actionable per se. It also examines protection from harassment act. The essay commences with a brief description of assault, battery and false imprisonment. It goes further advising the concerned parties on the right to claim they have in tort law and the development of the law over the years, with the aid of case law, principles and statutes.

    Read More

  • The Tort of Negligence

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    did owe a duty of care to Mrs. Donoghue, in that it was up to them to...

    Read More

  • Negligence Case Study

    935 Words  | 2 Pages

    Negligence, as defined in Pearson’s Business Law in Canada, is an unintentional careless act or omission that causes injury to another. Negligence consists of four parts, of which the plaintiff has to prove to be able to have a successful lawsuit and potentially obtain compensation. First there is a duty of care: Who is one responsible for? Secondly there is breach of standard of care: What did the defendant do that was careless? Thirdly there is causation: Did the alleged careless act actually cause the harm? Fourthly there is damage: Did the plaintiff suffer a compensable type of harm as a result of the alleged negligent act? Therefore, the cause of action for Helen Happy’s lawsuit will be negligence, and she will be suing the warden of the Peace River Correctional Centre, attributable to vicarious liability. As well as, there will be a partial defense (shared blame) between the warden and the two employees, Ike Inkster and Melvin Melrose; whom where driving the standard Correction’s van.

    Read More

  • Exploring Defamation: The Yeagle vs. Collegiate Times Case

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this scenario, Sharon Yeagle, assistant vice president of student affairs, brought a suit against the Collegiate Times for defamation. Yeagle worked at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Virginia Tech helping students participate in the Governor’s Fellows Program. The Collegiate Times published an article about the University’s success with placing students in this program and in the article under Yeagle’s name attributed the phrase “Director of Butt Licking”. Yeagle argued that the phrase implied the commission of sodomy and was actionable. The legal issue in this scenario questions if the phrase was defamatory or was it a deliberate exaggeration that no reasonable person would

    Read More

  • Negligent Tort

    1797 Words  | 4 Pages

    Negligence is a tort law and it falls within the civil law which means a civil wrong has been committed (Tort and Negligence, 2012). The American civil justice system, defines the law of torts as situations that occur when the wrongful conduct of one party causes harm to another individual (WiseGeek, 2003). The responsible party fails to act as a reasonable person to someone to whom she or he owes a duty, as required by law under the circumstances. Negligent torts are not committed purposely, and there must be an injury that occurs from the breach of the duty (Negligent Tort Law, 2014).

    Read More

  • How to Claim for Negligence

    1272 Words  | 3 Pages

    It seems as though Brad and Chardonnay have been subject to professional negligence, or more specific negligent misstatement. Professional negligence is very similar to general negligence, one of the significant difference being you cannot claim for economic loss within general negligence but you can in professional (provided specific criteria are met).

    Read More

  • Four Elements Of Common Law

    1505 Words  | 4 Pages

    Negligence is best defined as when one does not protect oneself or others from property damage, bodily injury or death. Therefore, this could be the act of causation of failure to act. In order to have a legal claim of negligence there are four elements which must be present and without them no case is secure. The four elements are Duty of Care, Breach of Duty, Causation and Damages.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Tort Of Negligence

    1171 Words  | 3 Pages

    The plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty to act reasonably, that the defendant failed to fulfill that obligation, that the breach of duty caused the plaintiffs injuries, and that the plaintiff suffered some sort of injury. In order to prove that the defendant was negligent and therefore liable for their injuries, the plaintiff must prove all of the elements which are duty, breach, proximate cause, and damages. For instance, one of the elements is damages, meaning the plaintiff must have suffered damages (injuries, loss, etc.) in order for the defendant to be held liable. So even if you can prove that the defendant indeed acted negligently, you may not collect damages if you didn't suffer any injuries. The law will not hold a defendant liable for every injury to the plaintiff but only for those injuries that are proven and directly related to a breach of a

    Read More

  • Foss V Harbottle Case Analysis

    1038 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Act allows negligence as the sole ground unlike common law which required the claimant to establish ‘fraud’ even if negligence existed. It is believed that the ‘d...

    Read More

  • Nursing Negligence Essay

    415 Words  | 1 Pages

    And two types of unintentional torts are negligence and/or malpractice. And intentional tort is generally defined as a willful act that violates another person's rights or property (Catalano, 2015). Guido (2014) states that the most commonly seen intentional torts within the health care arena are assault, battery, false imprisonment, conversion of property, trespass to land, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. For example,

    Read More

More about What Is The Most Appropriate Tort Of Negligence

Open Document