Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Understanding social norms
Understanding social norms
Social acceptance and examples
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Understanding social norms
The Foot-in-the-door method is a technique in which an individual makes small requests leading to a much larger request, in order to have a better chance of the larger request being accepted. The initial compliance of the requests is a result of individuals wanting to “feel that they are helpful and care about other people” and “an individual is committed to complying with a later request in order to act consistently” (Guéguen, Martin, Silone, & David, 2015, p. 2). The phenomenon of the Foot-in-the-door technique is a highly studied notion that we can see throughout the world such as in an experiment in the article “Foot-in-the-door technique and reduction of driver’s aggressiveness: A field study,” in mass media such as in the show The Big …show more content…
Specifically the episode “The Pancake Batter Anomaly” is an ideal example for the foot-in-the-door strategy. Sheldon, one of the show’s main characters has become seriously ill. In attempt to avoid taking care of Sheldon in one of his most irritating states, all of his friends make plans that will help them escape Sheldon’s annoying behavior. This leaves their neighbor Penny, who is unaware of how annoying Sheldon can be when he is sick, to take care of him. In order to get Penny to do what he says, Sheldon starts by asking Penny for small requests such as tucking him in. However, these requests get larger and more absurd as Penny complies with them. These requests get to the point where Penny must rub vapor-rub on Sheldon’s chest while singing his favorite childhood song. This is the perfect example for the foot-in-the-door technique because, this phenomenon deals with individuals asking for small favors in order to eventually ask for a much larger favor. Similarly, Sheldon asks Penny for small favors until the end, where gets her to do something that she probably would not have done if Sheldon had first asked her to rub vapor-rub on his chest while singing the …show more content…
In Guéguen, Martin, Silone, and David’s study we saw that the use of the Foot-in-the-door technique can also be used in order to impact someone’s reaction and for them to act in a less harsh manner and not display a negative reaction to having to comply with someone’s request or predicament such as the one in the experiment where the driver’s would have to wait at the green light for a another driver who seemed confined. In the episode of The Big Bang Theory, we saw that Sheldon was able to get Penny to comply to his completely absurd request of rubbing vapor rub on his chest while singing his favorite childhood song. Similarly, I was also able to convince my mother to go on a vacation with me to India. In all these situations, there were small requests that were first initiated that enabled the desired result. From the mini vacations in my situation, to Sheldon asking Penny to tuck him in in The Big Bang Theory, the small favors asked enabled the larger favor to be complied with, which makes up the phenomenon of the Foot-in-the-door
The American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2252-2268. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/214769221?accountid=45049. Gray, M. (2014). The 'Standard'. The L.A. riots: 15 years after Rodney King.
One example would be when Joe (Poncho Man) enters the ladie’s restroom. This scene is very sickening, as this is the scene he tries to make Mim kiss him. Starting on page 98, Poncho Man (Mim doesn’t like referring to him as his own name) enters the women's bathroom (Arnold 117). He starts off by making a remark about the smell and then goes on over to Mim. Later on he ends up kissing Mim without consent, where Mim’s reaction is to throw up in his mouth. After this event Mim felt uncomfortable around Poncho Man, therefore she decided to get of the Greyhound bus and continue her journey on a rental truck.
Every participant went through three hundred volts before they stopped and refused to go any further (McLeod, 2007). This study demonstrates that obedience is a part of who we are. Milgram concludes that there are two states of behavior. The first is autonomous behavior where the individual takes responsibility and the other is agentic state responsibility is on the person giving the orders (McLeod, 2007). People who are ordinary are capable of harming other individuals if a person of authority tells them to. For a person to be obedient they must believe the person giving the orders is qualified and will take responsibility. A person is less likely to harm another person if the authoritative person is not going to take responsibility. This was proven in Milgram’s study because when he told individuals they had to take responsibility they did not want to continue. The Milgram study has influenced other psychologist to explore what makes a person follow orders (Cherry, 2012). The other experiments that Milgram conducted showed that rebellious people are not as obedient. There were different environments demonstrated among the different studies that Milgram used and even though the environment changed the situation stayed the
The desire for self-preservation is present in all people; this is why SUV safety is such a huge issue. “Ask a typic...
Some reasons why powerful situations and a person 's conscience may influence a person’s behavior are because of situations of a moment, feeling pressured by others, and what someone might believe is an authority figure.
5. Wiley, Ann Stephanie, Lee Ann Slocum, and Finn-Aage Esbensen. 2013. "The Unintended Consequences of Being Stopped or Arrested: An Exploration of the Labeling Mechanisms Through Which Police Contact Leads to Subsequent Delinquency." American Society of Criminology 51:927-966.
According to Merriam Webster, the term “ethical” can be defined as “rules of behavior based on ideas about what is morally good and bad.” Being able to differentiate between what is good, and what is bad is key when it comes to many things. One of these things includes persuasion. There are many concepts that can explain why certain principles of persuasion can be more ethical than others, and many that are critical to being an ethical communicator. Said concepts are explained in Rothwell’s text, In the Company of Others, Robert Cialdini and Steve Martins video, Science of Persuasion, and Stephen Carter’s text, Integrity.
So, your door-knocking campaign just ended after a week of daily work. You have 40 contacts to follow-up with, and only five people who are capable to handle them. In addition, you have two sermons to prepare, two Bible class lessons, a blog to write, visits to make, and a family with which you must spend time. You are grateful for the abundant harvest God has provided, but, at the same time, it can be difficult, overwhelming, and discouraging to handle the aftermath of a campaign. But, since following-up with a contact is the most important part of a door-knocking campaign, it is crucial to handle the situation correctly. That is why there are several considerations to make concerning follow-up.
The first principle of persuasion is likeability. If a person knows you, likes you and trusts you, you will have more influence on that person. Many factors play into whether or not a person or group likes another person or group. Being attractive, having similarities or common ties, familiarity, praise and being complimentary, and also being connected to the positive help one to be more likeable. Reciprocity is the basic concept of ‘you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours’, and ‘what goes aournd comes around’ (Myers, 2010, pg. 237). Performing favors is a powerful tool to influence because people feel obligated to repay that favor. The third principle listed is social proof. This is related to peer pressure as people tend to look to others to substantiate and justif...
318). He also found that although retaliation without face-to-face contact with the violator may deliver harm, it is not the type of harm which cuts to the core of street values (Jacobs, 2004, p. 314). The preference for direct contact was outstandingly unified, and the violators which were used in the study were strangers, friends, loose acquaintances, and family members of varying equal statuses (Jacobs, 2004, p. 315). In this article, the author indicated that his findings helped to support the central purpose of the sample.
Every day in our life's we are persuaded to make choices. Persuasion is a very
The book, Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert B. Cialdini illustrates the implementation of reciprocation, commitment and consistency, social proof, liking, authority, and scarcity. The book identifies these six principles as weapons of influence in aiding with persuasion. The following explains and applies each principle.
The foot-in-the-door technique, also called the gradation technique, refers to the assumption that a person who has already complied with a small request is more likely to agree to a larger one later. This technique contrasts significantly with others that aim to influence behavior in that it seeks to do so without the use of “external pressure.”
Mary Parker Follett’s “The Giving of Orders” in this essay addresses the complexities of given orders and received. She presents that it is apparent through observation and through psychology that you cannot get moderate results with people when orders are given, pressured, influenced or manipulated. She articulates the need for the change in habits and patterns in people and correlates it to administration and organization. She proceeds in her article to further understand through, analysis that consists of three things. The first is the “build up certain attitudes,” the second, “provide for the release of these attitudes,” and the third, “augment the released response as it is being carried out.” If these three things are implemented,
“The one thing that unites all human beings, regardless of age, gender, religion, economic status, or ethnic background, is that, deep down inside, we all believe that we are above-average drivers” -Dave Barry, comedian. The number of accidents over the last ten years have drastically increased, drivers are paying less attention to the road itself. Many individuals behind the wheel of a car believe that their driving does not affect the road conditions, however it always will. The driving habits of today are catastrophic due to the reasoning that the driving will affect other lives through reckless or distracted driving, and disobeying traffic laws.