What Is The Construction Of The Secondary Characters In Frankenstein

1686 Words4 Pages

How does Mary Shelley’s construction of the secondary characters reflect upon the protagonist? Throughout Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, character parallels and analogies between Victor Frankenstein and the creature are strongly emphasized. More evidently, the character doubles between the creator Victor, and his creature are presented through their demeanor, their desires, and their demands. Shelley emphasizes parallelisms of nature, alienation, and vengeance to underscore their objective similarities, leading some readers to interpret that the creature is Victor’s double, an altered conscience. Both lonely and outcasts in the world, Victor and his creation live forlorn and dreary lives, hungry for the love of another, desperate for family, …show more content…

One of the most clear and compelling character parallels that Victor and the creature share is their loneliness and their isolation. When the creature observed De Lacey and his family in in a remote German village, he shadowed their behaviors and he began to master the basic ways of life; he learned of their emotions, their culture, and their history. Like a growing child, his mind was constantly saturated with new ideas, his thoughts twirling around the ways of human nature. Although heavily intrigued by their family and values, the creature ponders and says, “Increase knowledge only discovered to me more clearly what a wretched outcast I was” (Shelley, page 133). Progressively, the creature transforms into a slave to everything he learns. Like a child metamorphosing into adolescence, he begins to stray from his innocence and purity, discarding his once-naive ways of thought. This torture he feels, helps him alert Victor, sending him subtle warnings of what his life might become if he follows a certain path. Alone, he says, “I was dependent on none and related to none. The path of my departure was free, and there was none to lament my annihilation. My person was hideous and my stature gigantic. What did this mean? Who was I? What was I? Whence did I come? What was my destination? These questions continually recurred, but I was unable to solve them” (15.5). Without …show more content…

Infected by grandiosity, Victor denies his bad morals and crooked ideals. Victor chose to isolate himself from the world, neglecting his obligations as a partner, as friend, and in a sense, as a father. The creature on the other hand, is more emotionally attached. With a stronger sense of feeling, the creature tries to get Victor more in touch with his feelings and his bare humanity. The creature, even though he was made by Victor, teaches his creator more about himself. In a sense, the creature helps his master by asking him to raise him as he was raised, in a loving, present family. Prior to the creature’s shift as a murderer, Victor still craved solitude and welcomed weak relationships in turn for time alone. To the creature, this felt unfair. Fixated on his studies, he would seldom meet with friends or circle himself with the moving world surrounding him. As Victor finalized the creation, he was continually criticized. Short of an accepting support system, Victor was forced into conforming to societal principles. He chose to keep his creation a sworn and coveted secret, only disclosing the tale to Robert Walton towards the end of his life. Although Victor had limited choice in what his monster would amount to, his ugliness was the root of his boiling hatred towards humanity. Having such an abhorred countenance prohibited the creature from

Open Document