Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A dolls house nora character analysis
A doll house nora character and how it changes
What are the symbolism in a doll's house by Henrik Ibsen
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A dolls house nora character analysis
When she discovers the true nature of her husband, Nora realizes she is being used all of these time and the person she admired more than her own life doesn’t care whether she lives or dies. In the play, Nora wanted her husband to take her place of her crime and to accept his fall of reputation. Again, she planned to take her own life and tells Mrs. Linde to make the true statement on behalf of her so Torvald can be saved. Nora was desperately waiting for a miracle “but it’s so awful” (Ibsen 888). In the meantime, she tells Mrs. Linde that "it’s a wonderful joy, this waiting” (Ibsen 890) indicates Torvalds will soon learn all of her sacrifices which she made until now only to save him. But reality is very cruel, when Torvald learns about …show more content…
When Krogsted returns with Nora’s forge stamp, Torvald says “Nora, I’m saved” (Ibsen 901). Surprised Nora asks her husband what about me? He quickly replies we both saved. That moment Nora realizes though she stayed with Torvald in his deepest need, Torvald never realizes her as a partner instead these whole eight years that she suffered for his sake, Torvald only cares for his social status. He also set Nora “at a distance by choosing ‘I’” (Karpel, Individuation: from fusion to dialogue:807). In her paper “I'll Explain It to You” author Deborah Tannen illustrates an experiment, where a female student expresses her thinking about a story of a poor wife, who died during her facial operation. To the student, “the issue was interdependence: The woman was inextricably bound up with her husband, so her behavior could not be separated from his” (Tannen, I’ll Explain it to You:63) which means, because her husband did not like her face the poor wife also began to hate it. In the play the same thing happens with Nora, she realizes her life with Torvalds is no different than with her father. Nora says she “lived by doing tricks for Torvald“(Ibsen 904) and her Papa. They both buried her personal feelings by their own and ruined her process to find her own identity. Nora then says “I’ve been wronged greatly, Torvald- first by papa
In the play, the audience sees it from Nora’s perspective. Nora is Torvald’s little squirrel, his little, insignificant squirrel. Nora is worthless to Torvald and she only realizes in the end how foolish she is to think that he will
Throughout the play we never get to know who the real Nora is and what her true personality consists of. Nora also realizes that she does not know who she is, and decides to leave her life. She comments that she needs to discover who she is separate from her husband, children and more importantly society. Nora feels she is not respected, and she is a “doll” to her husband.
In the closing scenes, Nora witnesses the final indication that she is truly regarded as Torvald’s possession. Beforehand, Torvald stated that he would protect Nora at all costs. However, as soon as he discovers the possibility of his reputation being tainted, he instantly degrades her to a point of dehumanization. As a result, Nora comprehends that true love never existed in their marriage, “You don’t understand me. And I’ve never understood you either- until tonight. No, don’t interrupt. You can just listen to what I say. We’re closing out accounts” (Ibsen 1234). Through this scene, Ibsen effectively represents Nora’s final mental awakening. The author employs sharp and decisive diction to convey Nora’s transformation. She no longer amuses Torvald with her childish antics, but speaks with a matter of fact tone. Nora had become accustomed to “pretending” her whole life, and therefore had convinced herself that she was in a loving marriage. As Sabiha Huq, English professor at Khulna University, indicates, “Nora has admonished a life living through hypocrisy and falsehood” (par. 1). It becomes evident to Nora that her whole life she has been dependent on a male figure and has never accomplished anything for herself. Subsequently, Nora feels as though her life has been meaningless, “I went from Papa’s hands into yours… it seems as if I’d lived here like a beggar--just from hand to mouth. I’ve
Eventually, Victor becomes ill from keeping this secret and Henry has to take care of him. In the play, A Doll's House, Nora borrowed money without telling Torvald, and forged signatures on the bond. At first Nora was proud that her secret was responsible for saving her husband from death. That all changed after Krogstad's visit, involving him threatening Nora that he will reveal the secret. Nora starts to feel scared, even though Krogstad visit was kept a secret from Torvald. Nora knows that the fraud she committed is a serious crime and will extremely infuriate Torvald if he were to find out that she borrowed money from Krogstad and forged signatures on the bond because does not want to upset the peace between her and her husband. When Torvald first found out that Nora hid such a big thing from him, he spouted with anger. He was alarmed and ashamed over his wife's actions. Instead of thinking what made her do these acts, Torvald starts fuming about his future and talks inappropriately to Nora. It was this reaction of Torvald that made Nora leave him and their
Once Nora reveals her deceptive act to Mrs. Linde, we begin to see Nora’s character in a whole new light. One that is much more mature and determined than previously thought. It isn’t until Mrs. Linde accuses Nora of not knowing her hard day’s work that she finally reveals her greatest secret. It is through their common experience of sacrifice that unites them and brings them closer together again. As we reach the end of act one, we begin to see Nora struggle with her new problem of guilt.
Nora is a dynamic character. When the play begins Nora is viewed and presented as a playful and carefree person. She seems to be more intent on shopping for frivolous things. But, as time goes on it becomes apparent that Nora actually has a certain amount of seriousness in her decisions and actions in dealing with the debt she incurred to save Torvald’s life. Nora’s openness in her friendship with Dr. Rank changes after he professes his affections toward her. Her restraint in dealing with him shows that Nora is a mature and intelligent woman. Nora shows courage, not seen previously, by manipulating her way around Krogstad and his threats to reveal her secret. After feeling betrayed by Torvald, Nora reveals that she is leaving him. Having
Towards the ending of Act III, Torvald heavily berates Nora after he learned of Krogstad’s loan scandal. He makes an extreme statement about gender roles as he furiously scowls, “ I am in the power of the man without scruples” immediately following with, “And I am brought so pitifully low all because of a shiftless woman” (221). He makes a drastic claim that once again, men are superior to women. Torvald, who places his pride before others claims to have a “godly” power over all others, including Nora. He claims that he can do as he pleases without hesitation while Nora is supposed to follow Torvald’s notions. However, Nora has committed an immoral sin which jeopardizes Torvald’s reputation; hence he calls her a “shiftless woman”. Later on, when Torvald realizes that Krogstad has pardoned them once more, he exclaims, “I shouldn’t be a proper man if your feminine helplessness didn’t make you twice as attractive to me” (223). This hyperbole contradicts the first one as he tries to show his remorse for Nora after learning of the pardon. He desperately tries to convince Nora that he has completely forgiven her, despite claiming that she was nothing more than an inconvenience to him. It is evident that Torvald uses hyperboles to oppress Nora as well as to beg to gain back her love and
Nora was wife of Helmer and a mother of 3 children. They lived in a house where their nurse Anne-Marie took care of the children and Helene which was their maid took care of the house work. Nora was a stay at home mother and would occasionally take on little jobs in order to make ends meet. Nora has lived her whole life as a puppet. Her life has always been controlled by someone else; first by her father and then by her husband Helmer. “Her whole life is a construct of societal norms and the expectations of others” (Wiseman). “Nora’s father would force his beliefs on her and she would comply with them lest she upset him; she would bury her personal belief under Papa’s. According to Nora, Torvald was guilty of the same things” (Wiseman). Nora has always lived her life according to the beliefs of someone else. She didn 't know how to live life any other way because this is how she was raised. She felts trapped in the life she lived because she knew no other way of living besides her current lifestyle. Due to Nora being controlled her whole life she seemed childish and lacked knowledge of the world outside her house. At the end of the story Helmer decides to show his true colors once his future was threatened. This made Nora realize that she does not love her husband nor does he love her, and decides that is not the life she wants to live. “Helmer: You talk like a child. You don 't know anything of the world you live
Lastly, the amount of deception and dishonesty between Nora and Torvald would have broken the marriage even without Krogstad’s extortion plot. Both Nora and Torvald are living in a world of lies, and both of them are not honest with each other and themselves. In the beginning of the play, Torvald and Nora are portrayed to be a perfect couple with a perfect life. Nora is seen returning home after a day of shopping and is greeted lovingly by her husband. Even though they seemed to have had some financial troubles in the past, Torvald just received a new job as a bank manager and everything seemed to be alright, but behind the scenes nothing was alright.
Nora engages in a mutually dependent game with Torvald in that she gains power in the relationship by being perceived as weak, yet paradoxically she has no real power or independence because she is a slave to the social construction of her gender. Her epiphany at the end at the play realises her and her marriage as a product of society, Nora comes to understand that she has been living with a constr...
She starts to play more attention to Torvald after Krogstad threatens to tell her secret. Nora realizes that Torvald only sees her as a child that needs his help with everything she does. As she said,” I have existed merely to perform tricks for you, Torvald. But you would have it so” (720). She comes to understand that she was merely a doll to him, and that’s all he’s ever going to want her to be. Once Krogstad reveals the secret she decides to leave Torvald when he fails to prove that he truly loves her. As she said, “when the wonderful thing did not happen; then I saw you were not the man I had thought you” (722). She wanted him to show her that he would protect her and instead he got furious at her.
He specifically shows his selfishness in the way he treats Nora. First, he treats her more as child then an adult. At points, Torvald calls Nora names such as, “My little Nora” and “Little Miss Stubbornshoes” (35). Torvald’s relationship with Nora seems more like father and daughter, rather than husband and wife; and because of this Torvald doesn't treat Nora like a true husband should. Torvalds selfishness correlates with his love for Nora and the way he treats her. Torvald doesn't truly love Nora. Instead, he uses her as a decoration, making him feel good about himself and his appearance in society. In addition, his selfishness is shown when he receives Krogstad's letter regarding Nora's forgery. Torvalds self-centered personality can be shown as he accuses her of damaging his good name rather than being grateful for the loans. Instead of acting calm about the situation he insults Nora and screams at her. As Torvald expresses, “You’re speaking like a child. You don’t understand the society you live in” (64). He once again, refers to her as a child and attempts to remind Nora of the kind of society they live in, in efforts to not ruin his own reputation. In addition he says, “You that I carried with my two hands throughout our entire marriage. Do you understand what you’ve done to me?” (59) Ultimately he doesn't show love for Nora and instead selfishly blames her for jeopardizing
Up until Nora’s epiphany, she believed that Torvald loved her and would be willing to sacrifice his honor for her, just as she had done for Torvald; she never imagined that Torvald “would consent to accept…[Krogstad’s] conditions” (Pg. 70) The knowledge that Torvald was not willing to sacrifice his honor for Nora, while Nora sacrificed her honor to help Torvald recover from being ill ultimately allows Nora to see the problems with society, as wives were always seen as below their husbands, and have the epiphany that she has been wronged by Torvald. Ibsen furthers this through the diction of “consent” with the denotation of giving permission to something, the connotation of attempting to preserve one’s honor, and the tone of demeaning. This exhibits that Torvald was willing to go to any depths in order to protect his own honor and helping Nora was nowhere in his
After asking his wife if she understands what she has done Nora answers “[Looking squarely at him, her face hardening] Yes. I am beginning to understand everything” (835). This statement might be the key phrase of Nora’s realization. The double- meaning implies Nora’s understanding of the actual situation as well as her awareness that her marriage, even though it conforms with social expectations, is far from perfect. She now doubts the depth of her love for Torvald and becomes calm with comprehension as she begins to recognize the truth about her marriage. While she expects compassion for her sacrifice, she is none given. Instead of sacrificing anything to help Nora out of her predicament, Torvald is only worried about himself and appearances. It becomes very clear, after the second letter from Krogstad arrives, that her well-being always comes second “I’m saved. Nora, I’m saved! You too, of course” (836). Throughout the conversation with Torvald, Nora finally realizes, she needs to rearrange her life and priorities to be happy. This implies independence and self-awareness. While Nora finally understands the situation, she is in and what she needs to do but Torvald defines her new attitudes as madness “You’re ill, Nora; you’re feverish; I almost think you’re out of your mind” (840). “However, the characterization has been tied to the fact that she is breaking taboos or challenging conventions” (Langås 160). Torvald is still stuck in his fantasy world of how a wife should talk and act per his standard and the society he stands for. “Nora still has no way of knowing that she is not endangering her children with her presence and in the end, she feels impelled to leave, and her decision is less an act of defiance against her husband and society than an attempt to save the lives of her children” (Brooks
As the play goes on, Nora seems to transform from her delicate little character into something much more. At the end of act one, Krogstad goes to Nora for the recollection of the money she had borrowed from him. "You don?t mean that you will tell my husband that I owe you money?" (21). Since Nora was wrong in doing so socially, she could not tell Torvald or anyone else about her problem. Not only would that affect their social standard but also Torvald's ego, which inevitably would happen anyway. After Krogstad threatens to expose Nora for forging her father's signature, she realizes that no matter what she does Torvald was going to know the truth. The flaw with...