Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of socrates and glaucon
Summary of socrates and glaucon
Just or unjust, which is better
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary of socrates and glaucon
Glaucon argues that if Gyge’s magic ring were given to a just person and an unjust person, then they both would act unjustly. Glaucon also suggests that as humans, we are born with desires and if opportunity presents itself for us to carry out those desires without getting caught or our reputation being tarnished, we would carry out all our desires. As humans, we do things naturally and they are part of our “human nature,” naturally humans carry out a reputation- an image we want to present to the public. Not only do we have reputations to carry out, we also have expectations to fulfill and are afraid of getting caught. And therefore, we live our life as if we were on surveillance cameras. For example, cheating is considered a horrendous act with many consequences, such as expulsion or receiving a zero on your exam. …show more content…
As students, we are expected to have academic integrity and out of fear of consequences we do what is expected of us because our reputation will be tarnished if don’t do what is “just”.
Being said, if a just person and an unjust person has the exact same ring as Gyge’s, giving them the ability of being invisible both just and unjust persons by “human nature” will follow out their desires because the just person will no longer live in fear, expectation, or have their reputation blemished if no one is there to watch and see them. In other words, they longer fear in getting caught. As for the unjust person, they will do what they already have been doing except they can do it with peace because no one can watch them or catch them in their “acts”. So, if both just and unjust persons receive this ring of invisibility they both would end up being unjust because it is human nature to have desires and now they both can fulfill them because they no longer in fear of getting
caught. The tripartite theory of the soul composes of three parts: reason, spirit, and appetite. Reason is our guidance, spirit is our competitiveness, and appetite is our desires. Every single person, has these three elements. However, what determines how we act and react is eros. Eros is the passion and it directs us to where we want to be or what we have more of on the tripartite theory of the soul (reason, spirit, and appetite). The soul is what directs eros. For example, if the soul directs eros to appetite he or she will only think about their desires. And if an unjust person only think about their desires, they lack balance and to have justice in the soul means that each part (reason, spirit, and appetite) has eros. One needs passion to be considered happy. Therefore, one is unjust if they lack balance, and if you lack balance, you lack passion which is vital when it comes to ones happiness.
Glaucon presents an argument against justice in order to pressure Socrates to give a more convincing argument for living a just life. He was unsatisfied with Plato’s counterargument against Thrasymachus. Glaucon wants to believe that justice is good and that living a just life will result in a good life, unlike the Fool in the Leviathan. However, Glaucon strengthening the argument that the unjust life is better. Glaucon starts his argument with the three ways in which something can be good: good in itself, good in itself and good for its consequences, and bad or indifferent in itself but good for its consequences. After presenting these three types of good things, Glaucon asks Socrates to place justice into one of the three categories. Socrates’s responds by saying the he would define justice as the kind of good that we like both for its own sake and for its consequences. Glaucon then requests that Socrates present a convincing argument that justice is good for its own sake, regardless of its consequences. He essentially wants to hear a compelling argument that shows justice as a kind of good that is good for its own sake. Glaucon eventually developed a case that supports the unjust life. He argues that anyone, just or unjust, would commit acts of injustice if they could get away with it and not suffer any consequences. To support his claim, he
It is hard to do the right thing, especially when you feel that you aren’t being watched. In The Republic, Plato tells a story about a man who finds a magical ring that lets him become invisible, and he begins to steal anything he wants. Plato uses the story to wonder whether human beings only do the right thing because they fear being caught. Although that situation could vary for many different people, human nature persuades us to do the wrong thing.
Hyde gives several definitions of qualities that contribute to the archetype of trickster. It is stated that the trickster, when in the presence of someone who cannot make an honorable choice, “suggests an amoral action, something right/wrong that will get life going again,” (Hyde 7). Additionally, a trickster very well may be troublemakers, leaving mischief strewn across their path, however despite “all their disruptive behavior, tricksters are regularly honored as the creators of culture,” (Hyde 8). The Green Knight tests Gawain’s honor by swaying him to make immoral decisions, and while these actions may cause the knight to falter some in his honor and chivalry, in the end he is stronger for it and grows in character. In the tale, the Green Knight crosses boundaries, offers a sense of contradiction, and allows a space within society to question itself. All these reasons fulfill the requirements of the trickster archetype as laid out by Hyde, and prove that the Green Knight typifies the characteristics of the trickster within the story of Sir Gawain and the Green
No matter where we go in the world, we will always be surrounded and tempted by sin. These temptations test our character and morality, and they prove that our human nature inherently causes us to fall to the sins that encompass us. Even though the world is a dark and immoral place to live, we all value our lives and are prepared to do almost anything to protect ourselves from harm’s way. In Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, the green girdle serves as symbol that highlights Gawain’s incessant love for life that tempts him to stray from his knightly code of chivalry.
...cting unjustly. Therefore, justice is determined to be intrinsically valuable from the negative intrinsic value of injustice that was demonstrated, as well as from parts of the soul working together correctly. Glaucon also wants Plato to show that a just life is better than an unjust life. It has been shown that when the soul is in harmony, it only acts justly. It is in a person’s best interests to have a healthy soul, which is a just soul, so that the person can be truly happy. This means that by showing justice has an intrinsic value, it can also be concluded that it is better to live a just life opposed to an unjust life. The conclusion that I have drawn is that Plato’s argument against the intrinsic value of injustice is sufficient to prove that the just life is superior, even if the unjust life may be more profitable.
When relating Plato’s “Ring of Gyges” to the culture that we live in now, he explains that persons are selfish and egoistic. The reason is that people do not always do the unfair things because they fear of being caught and harmed. As a human being, everything we do is coherent. When it comes to Cultural relativism, it is our beliefs, customs, and ethical virtue that relate to our social context. The main purpose is that most people do the right or wrong things that affects the society. The story explains the meaning behind what Glaucon is saying about his culture and what he had to go through and it contradicts his egoism.
In conclusion, I have argued that without a sense of accountability a connection to morality cannot be made. Wirzba’s claim holds true, and we must take into account our actions and be respectful of the requirements of the places we encounter.
Whether people are noticing a fight or hearing about a person who risks their life for someone else, people always witness good and bad human behaviour. However, these actions can have negative results: a person in a fight can become seriously injured, and a person risking their life can easily end up dead. In The Book Thief, Markus Zusak proves that kind or cruel human behaviour often causes consequences through the actions of several characters.
middle of paper ... ... Even though he has escaped the immediate and blatant prejudice that overwhelms Southern society, he constantly faces subtle reminders of the prejudice that still exists in society at this time. Even if they are not as extreme as the coin-eating bank. A major reason the invisible man remains invisible to society is because he is unable to escape this bigotry that exists even where it is not supposed to.
The three men discuss justice as if it's a good thing. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove that it is, and argues if it is just to do wrong in order to have justice, or on the other hand, is it unjust to never do wrong and therefore have no justice. For example; a man who lies, cheats and steals yet is a respected member of the community would be living a just life, in comparison to a man who never lied, cheated, nor stole anything but lives in poverty and is living an unjust life. Glaucon assumes the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.
Last but not least, injustice does not provide the most good for the most number of people. Just acts spawn other just acts just like unjust acts spawn other unjust acts. If everyone behaved unjustly, mankind would return to a state of nature (everyone is for themselves) which would be very unprofitable for the unjust individual due to a decreased likelihood of survival. An action is clearly unprofitable for the unjust individual if it would eventually create a hostile environment for him. Hence, one should set an example for others by living a just life which would create a better environment for him as well as for others.
The heavy rain slammed against the ground in the dark of night. The man rounded the corner only to witness the dreadful sight of a lifeless figure limp on the coated concrete. It was horrid, blood splatter, and torn flesh. The torture that this poor person could have endured would be preposterous. He was enraged, teeth clenched, he cursed the gods for allowing such people to get killed by emotionless and cruel “humans”. Every single person born on this Earth is not invincible to such acts. Similar to William Golding, every human contains a non-civilized or barbaric characteristic due to the fact that people always struggle for power, someone’s craving for their desires can cloud their judgment of what’s right, and the only thing that contains
When one is just, he seems to receive endless amounts of praise and fortune due to the common belief of those surrounding him that he is indeed just. Contrary, when one is unjust, he receives endless amounts of shame and hardships due to the prevailing belief of those surrounding him that he is indeed unjust. However, one has the ability to put on a façade and deceive those around him into thinking that he is just, when, in reality, he is unjust. This can lead to many misinterpretations of a man’s true actions as his peers do not truly know, nor even realize that they do not know, that he may be unjust in private affairs. Similarly, if a man has a universal reputation for being unjust, but is actually just, he would be treated as if he indeed
Deception has a history… that consists of shifts in the activities [and] objects… that people associate with deception, the concept’s moral valances, and the sites where it is both performed and exposed. Duplicity is undoubtedly an ancient human behavior, but how people have explained and especially policed
Note that this essay maintains that to seek to act immorally is irrational. To attempt at least to act morally if given the option is rational. It is also irrational for justice to be arbitrary.