What Happened To Martin Luther's Ninety-Five Theses?

815 Words2 Pages

One of the greatest acts of defiance in religious history was Martin Luther’s written “Ninety-Five Theses”, which condemned the papacy’s practice of reducing ones time spent in purgatory by paying money, or referred to as indulgences. This act of defiance, caused the peasants to revolt against either the papacy, their rulers, or Martin Luther. This created the debate on who and what caused the revolt in the early 1500s. As seen in “The German Reformation and the Peasants’ War”, through sources of primary documents, Michael G. Baylor reveals that Luther and his followers were in some ways responsible for inspiring violent rebellion and The Peasants’ War because their ideals and rhetoric threatened the churches stronghold. Yet, Luther claims …show more content…

His promotion of heresy and Christian defiance encouraged others to follow. Luther stirred up many emotions, “Many people shared the growing feeling of malaise and discontent because of the corrupt times” . These emotions arose after he posted his 95 Thesis and claimed that purchasing indulgences would not actually remove time spent in purgatory. Creating this claim threatened the entire stronghold of the Christian church and directly called out the Pope, the father of the church, as a heretic. In Luther’s 50th point in his 95 thesis he exclaims, “Christians are to be taught that if the pope knew the exactions of the indulgence preachers, he would rather that the basilica of St. Peter were burned to ashes than built up with the skin, flesh, and bones of the sheep”. By stating this and referring to the Pope as a heretic, Luther is ultimately saying that the famous Roman Basilica should be burned which poses a huge threat to the center of worship, which would offend any religion. Luther caused the greatest act of defiance towards the Catholic Church, which understandably upset the peasants because they grew accustomed to their religion and Luther’s single thesis destroyed their …show more content…

Luther believed that it was a part of his duty as a Christian man to return the Church to its origin and rid it of all added corruption caused by the papacy. He never would have involved himself in such a bold act if he did not feel that it was important and made him so conflicted. Martin Luther stated, “Commoners should only act against the church at the command or with the authorization of the nobles and the princes, who by definition could not be rebellious.” This quote shows that Luther never intended or could foreshadow that a rebellion would occur. His followers created the rebellion, but Luther was not leading it. In fact, one of Luther’s early followers, Thomas Muntzer, was used violence to spread Luther’s message and was considered one of the first to constitute active resistance. Muntzer was a pastor from a small town but he formed a small group to accompany him in burning down a shrine of the Virgin Mary. Munzter threatened in his exposition, “If the princes of Saxony did not act as they should, they would lose “the sword”- the power of government”. Muntzer did not follow Luther’s demands and he used violence anyways, which ultimately caused other peasants to have more hate

More about What Happened To Martin Luther's Ninety-Five Theses?

Open Document