Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The prince analysis machiavelli essay
The prince analysis machiavelli essay
Summary of the prince by machiavelli pages 24 to 28
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The prince analysis machiavelli essay
In chapter twenty-five of the The Prince by Machiavelli he argues that while fortune is a big determinant of whether a ruler is successful or not, it is not the only factor that leads them to success. Machiavelli claims that fortune or chance only determines half of ones lives, one must take action of the other half and do their best in obtaining success. The main point that Machiavelli is trying to make in this chapter that while a ruler might not have control over certain events or circumstances occurring during his rule, he must face these head on and try to make what is wrong right. Machiavelli illustrates this by comparing fortune with a river, a river that overflows and floods everything in its way and it chases people away. However, rather than succumbing to this the people should come back when the river permits, and learn from this and built dams that will protect them if such event were to reoccur. In the beginning of the chapter Machiavelli states that many believe that everything is governed by fortune that there really is not sense for people to try to interfere the way of thing. Machiavelli establishes that while …show more content…
fortune is a very important factor of what occurs in ones live, one still possesses free will. In this chapter Machiavelli reiterates that a ruler cannot simply rely on his fortune, for if it changes then he can be destroyed. Machiavelli determines that the best way to resist fortune is to be “headstrong”. Machiavelli also admits that many rulers have acquired glory in different ways, but he also admits that two men can act the same way in their journey to achieving glory and one will not achieve their goal. Machiavelli states that because one can not change the way of their behavior and attitude to accommodate the times and circumstances as they change, then it is recommended to be headstrong rather than cautious. Machiavelli argues that idealistically men would be able to change their behavior to accommodate times changes, or change in fortune. He argues that the best way to for a ruler to be successful is to adjust his policy to one that fits the as time changes. Machiavelli then makes the point that it is not possible for a ruler to change his behavior to fit the times because it is so engrained in the ruler to act a certain way that when the time comes to change the way he behaves to favor his rule he would not be able to do so. He illustrates this by saying that the cautious ruler when it come time to be headstrong will not know how to behave, and that would lead to his failure. Machiavelli then comes to the conclusion that because a ruler is not able to change their behavior, fortune may or may not favor them. However, that does not mean that men can never achieve glory because they cannot change their behavior, the best way that a ruler can resist fortune when it is not in their favor is to be headstrong, because fortune yields for the bold. After reading chapter twenty-five one can make a connection with chapter seven, where Machiavelli explains that there are some cases in which a new ruler can rise to power with the help of others, meaning that this ruler had the good fortune of being given the power to rule.
However, like it is said in chapter twenty-five fortune is fickle and cannot be trusted. A ruler cannot simply rely on their good fortune. Fortune already did half of work and now it is up to the ruler to dictate the outcome of this good fortune. The ruler still possesses free will, meaning that that he can either choose to take advantage of his good fortune and establish a successful rule or to fail in being successful. One must be able to manipulate their good fortune to keep it good. It is now their job to take advantage of the gift of fortune and hold onto
it. Chapter twenty-five also emphasized on the idea presented in chapter eight, that while one is fortunate enough to obtain power because of their boldness it might now always lead to the great achievement of all; glory. It is empathized in chapter nine like it is said in twenty-five that not everything is derived from luck or fortune. After reading chapter twenty-five of The Prince, one can derive that a successful and glorious rule is the outcome of both good fortune and virtu. A glorious rule does not only consist of the ability of the ruler to wield power; they have to have fortune on their side. It is the mix of skill and good fortune that offers best results. One most be fortunate enough to posses virtu and skills that will allow a ruler to achieve glory and admiration. If one does not have fortune on their side and then even if they do possess the skill and virtu of a glorious ruler it will simply not be feasible, because a glorious rule is half good fortune half good skill and virtu. Also it is derived that if one does possess the good fortune a ruler must always be ready for it to change against him, one cannot take for their good fortune for granted. Like stated before fortune is fickle and a ruler must always be prepared for what fortune deals them, and they should be headstrong when facing whatever if being dealt to them. A successful principality will derive only from a ruler that knows how to deal with fortune whether it be a good or bad fortune. A ruler will we able to establish a successful principality by having clear that fortune only makes up for half of what is done, he should be skillful [virtuoso] enough to manipulate that fortune to his advantage.
Machiavelli’s, “The Prince” is the ideal book for individuals intending to both govern and maintain a strong nation. Filled with practical advice, he includes numerous religious references to support his claims. He devotes a chapter within the book to speak about the ancient founders of states. In the chapter called, “On new principalities that are acquired by one’s own arms and by virtue”, Machiavelli discussed the importance of a prince to have their own talent in governing a nation, rather than having relied on fortune to rule. The latter is a risk no leader should take and he cited past leaders as a guide for both the current and future princes.
As he begins to conclude, Machiavelli states that the prince: “should think about avoiding those things which make him hated and despised.” (Mach 48) Although these lack any withstanding moral values, they are effective in the sense that they better serve their purpose. Machiavelli was seeking to display a way to hold political power by any means possible not a utopian state. This may mean malicious acts, imprisonment, and torture, or it may mean the utilization of power to achieve a common good. Machiavelli doesn’t elaborate on this. He concentrates on a realistic approach towards government, as he remains concerned with the establishment and protection of power.
of participating in a conspiracy to restore the republic, because of this he was sent to jail for three weeks, and tortured. He fled the city of Florence, and decided to settle down in a calm quiet town called Sant’Andrea. He also decided to continue his dream and career as a writer. In 1513 he started to write his Discourses, this book focused on states controlled by the prince and the citizens. It was not finished until 1521, because he interrupted his work on Discourses to write the very famous The Prince.
Machiavelli discusses human free will especially in its relation to God, or more specifically, fortune. He chooses to focus on Fortune though, leaving God out of the equation for the most part which he does in most of his writing, as he believes his writing is on politics which is separate from religion. He argues that the general belief is that Fortune and God govern human affairs and that it is easy for humans to...
The basis of Machiavelli’s theory and ideas came from his most famous quote, “It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both.” He has a very strict policy as to how a prince should act. Rather than being caring, he believes in strong punishment. He has a “Sit in the corner and think!” type attitude towards the people. His ideas were extreme, but they have been proved to work. They are effective and learning from Machiavelli is something any ruler should do. In his book he explains all the things a ruler shouldn’t do and balances it with all the things that should be done.
Niccolo Machiavelli lived in Florence, Italy in the 1400’s. The country of Italy was divided into city-states that had their own leaders, but all pledged alliance to their king. In time in which great leaders were needed in order to help the development of a city-state and country, Machiavelli had a theory that man needed a leader to control them. In his book The Prince, he speaks of the perfect leader.
The most astounding aspect of The Prince is Machiavelli’s view that princes may indeed, be cruel and dishonest if their ultimate aim is for the good of the state. It is not only acceptable but necessary to lie, to use torture, and to walk over other states and cities. Machiavellianism is defined as “A political doctrine of Machiavelli, which denies the relevance of morality in political affairs and holds that craft and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political power (Def.)” This implies that in the conquest for power, the ends justify the means. This is the basis of Machiavellianism. The priority for the power holder is to keep the security of the state regardless of the morality of the means. He accepts that these things are in and of themselves morally wrong, but he points out that the consequences of failure, the ruin of states and the destruction of cities, can be far worse. Machiavelli strongly emphasizes that princes should not hesitate to use immoral methods to achieve power, if power is necessary for security and survival.
When a private individual becomes a ruler, he will need both his inner skills and a good chance to show them. The relationship of fortune and the virtù will bring him the success. Without a chance, the skills will not find a way to show them while gaining the power, and without the skills, given chance can not be used effectively for a long time.
Machiavelli once said ‘Because men are wretched creatures who would not keep their word to you, you need not keep your word to them’. Machiavelli is seen in history as one of the most influencing men of all time. Matter a fact, “the name Machiavelli was a synonym for the devil” (Barnett page 6). Machiavelli established a lot of this reputation from his work The Prince, it was written in 1513-1514. But, a lot people thought that he was misunderstood considering he wrote many books and people focus mostly on one. Second you must take the time period into thought and realize how the world was about 500 years ago.
Machiavelli argues in chapter 5 that the key to taking over a free state is initially to destroy it. By destroying the city, Machiavelli believes that the citizens will have no choice but to follow the direction of the new prince. He goes deeper to say that if a prince who occupies these cities does not destroy it, he risk the probable outcome of a rebellion. This rebellion is brought fourth by the tradition held by the citizens and the memories of the former way of government. The second step is to live there in person to establish loyalty and the third step is letting the people live by its own laws, but establish a small government who is loyal to you to keep it friendly. Chapter 6 gives us some insight on what Machiavelli feels leadership is. Leaders, he explains, are followers too in many ways. All leaders are imitating great rulers in history. A leader who really wants to achieve glory, does so by his own prowess, meaning by his own talent. Anyone can inherit a kingdom, but not anyone can rule it with natural leadership. This kind of leadership is what makes great leaders in history such as Moses or Cyrus. Chapter 7 explains that a leader should not try to buy his subjects. If a prince buys his subjects they will only temporarily be loyal. A prince needs to eliminate his enemies and do so all at once. Even if a prince does not succeed in ruling by his own prowess in his lifetime, he is still setting a good foundation for future princes which is just as important. Chapter 8 explains the level of evil that should be done in order to rise to power. He gives us clear insight of the pros and cons of obtaining power by evil means and how to use evil in ways of benefit. Machiavelli was a man of manipulation.
It shows us that he is a realist who believes that we cannot be good all the time and if we try to study the ideal instead of focusing on reality, it will ruin us as he says “A great many men have imagined states and princedoms such as nobody ever saw or knew in the real world, and there’s such a difference between the way we ought to live and the man who neglects the real to study the ideal will learn how to accomplish his ruin” (Machiavelli 42). He is saying the prince cannot let his emotions get in the way or he will be ruined and not do his job of protecting his country well, however, he says that being bad is inevitable and that the prince ought to use this to gain authority as he says “ a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn not to be good, and use that knowledge, …, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli 42). Machiavelli tells us that he prince should steer clear of vices to the best of his ability and to practice virtue, but knows that practicing all these virtues is not possible due to the human condition, and that it is still acceptable to practice
A ruler cannot show any weakness, or else he will no longer be feared enough to keep him in power, and he will be overthrown. In The Prince, Machiavelli asserts that it is best for a ruler to be both feared and loved, but if he cannot be both, it is much better to be feared. People are unlikely to overthrow a ruler that they fear, because they fear the punishments for failure.
"A wise ruler cannot and should not keep his words when such observance of faith would be to his disadvantage" ( Machiavelli 186), but this is utter nonsense given the time period we are in now; it says that a ruler should be able to change his words when he perceives it as necessary and beneficial. Rulers of all kind-simple actions to quote-on-quote heroic actions, would manipulate such privilege. In many countries around the world, people are being chastised and oppressed by ruthless leaders, as in the Middle East, that lack such integrity to be morally upright in their principles. For instance, previous leaders such as Genghis Khan, Napoleon Bonaparte, and Fidel Castro has shown how corrupted a ruler who lacks veracity could be. He would not care for his people, he could commit mass genocide as did Adolphus Hitler in Nazi Germany and did the Akazu elite politicians in Rwanda or even brainwash his people to the point that the no nothing beside the propaganda that is often displayed in this country as in North Korea. A person in power should be able to maintain a true, honest and genuine personality inside and out; he should not be switching faces depending on situations faster than a chameleon changes
The common thread that ties together all of Machiavelli's beliefs is his basic view of human nature. Machiavelli believes that humans are greedy, dishonest, and are looking out for themselves above all else. The majority of what Machiavelli dictates to his audience is based on the fact that the prince has to be very careful in how he deals with his citizens, as well as those in other states. The prince has to keep them all satisfied, to avoid any attempts to dethrone him. Machiavelli even suggests that there are times in which the prince will be required to act immorally in order to keep the people of the state on his side. Machiavelli states "Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good" (P.42). In this statement Machiavelli acknowledges that humans are selfish and dishonest, so for a prince to keep his authority, he must learn when to not exhibit virtuous characteristics. Simply put, some actions that seem virtuous will ruin a pr...
... to the times of kings and princess, however it must be noted that the underlying human emotions and their motivations can only be dealt with decisiveness and deep plotting. The concepts discussed are applicable to all leaders and politicians holding offices. Bottom line is, some things never changes. Even though a lot has changed, principles of Machiavelli’s Prince are adapted and used widely yet secretly in a complex world of growth and prosperity with a greater demography and geography.