Machiavelli's The Prince: The Power Of An Ideal Leader

766 Words2 Pages

Although, Machiavelli argues that an ideal ruler must be cruel, feared and unjust in order to maintain power in his paper, "The Prince", this is not necessary true. An ideal ruler must be assertive, just and filled with integrity to maintain power, prestige, and the loyalty of those he governs. An ideal leader must be assertive in the sense that he is able to stand up for himself without undue anxiety, express his beliefs and honest feelings comfortably in direct and honest ways without denying the rights of others. This would enable him to lead his people in unison. Machiavelli says that, "it is necessary to be a great pretender and a dissembler"(Machiavelli 186). If this were true of our time, then it any liar could be considered a good …show more content…

For an unjust leader equates an unjust law which is "a code that is out of harmony with the moral law"(King 207). When there is any kind of injustice in a system, especially in the centre of it all, the whole system would collapse, the oppressed would seek for justice in one way or another, the loyal supporters would loose faith in the leader, the leader cannot contain the people, and the system would crumble into bits just like the Roman Empire. When situations get bad "so long as a he keeps his subjects united and loyal, a prince ought not to mind the reproach of cruelty" (Machiavelli 180), said Machiavelli, is not an acceptable style either for it simply means that a ruler can do whatsoever-he-seeks-fit. An ideal ruler should be wise enough to know that just because majourity is happy and that there seems to be uniformity in the nations does not mean that all is well; the oppressed could be patient for some time to just maintain order, but that poise is not always maintained-demonstrations are ultimately the end results of such …show more content…

"A wise ruler cannot and should not keep his words when such observance of faith would be to his disadvantage" ( Machiavelli 186), but this is utter nonsense given the time period we are in now; it says that a ruler should be able to change his words when he perceives it as necessary and beneficial. Rulers of all kind-simple actions to quote-on-quote heroic actions, would manipulate such privilege. In many countries around the world, people are being chastised and oppressed by ruthless leaders, as in the Middle East, that lack such integrity to be morally upright in their principles. For instance, previous leaders such as Genghis Khan, Napoleon Bonaparte, and Fidel Castro has shown how corrupted a ruler who lacks veracity could be. He would not care for his people, he could commit mass genocide as did Adolphus Hitler in Nazi Germany and did the Akazu elite politicians in Rwanda or even brainwash his people to the point that the no nothing beside the propaganda that is often displayed in this country as in North Korea. A person in power should be able to maintain a true, honest and genuine personality inside and out; he should not be switching faces depending on situations faster than a chameleon changes

Open Document