Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of the word sustainability
The concept of the word sustainability
Sustainability definition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Fall of Mankind as We Know It
Sustainability is the ability to be maintained at certain rate level usually associated with the environment. In modern works of literature, the ideology of sustainability is predominantly not emphasized upon by writers enough. As the today's generation begins to venture out into the world, the principle of sustainability must be taught throughout the world because of the number of resources and pollution that man currently is using and inflicting upon the environment there might not be another generation left. In Ishmael, Daniel Quinn writes about the moral ethics that has driven the civilization of mankind and the ideology of sustainability Quinn uses the character of Ishmael to teach and inform the readers
…show more content…
the ideology of mankind's origins, ways of life, and where man went wrong. Quinn focuses on two themes that are prevalent in the novel which are the culture of leavers and takers and the Tree of Knowledge. Is The culture of leavers and takers is prevalent throughout the novel. Ishmael separates mankind into two categories of leavers and takers. Ishmael lays down a foundation to his student by defining the following as leavers are defined as being individuals who tend to live a primitive way of life, and takers are defined as being individuals who tend to live a civilized way of life. The culture of leavers thrived on their way of life for thousands of years. However, the Neolithic Revolution is what initiated the transition between the two ways of life. Mankind had understood that they no longer need to live a nomadic way of life which would prevent them from moving place to place in search of food and could simply grow their food in one place. The Neolithic Revolution occurred about 23000 years ago and since then humans have looked back and evolved in becoming the most civilized creatures on this planet. Ishmael teaches his pupil that taker culture has gradually expanded throughout the world because humans believe that it fundamentally works and right when he says, "Mother Culture teaches you that this is as it should be. Except for a few thousand savages scattered here and there, all the peoples of the earth are now enacting this story"(39). This theme of the culture of leavers and takers goes hand and hand with the ideology of sustainability in that the way of life that takers pursue is not sustainable. The number of resources that man currently uses exceeds what nature can provide on a natural basis. Resources will run out if man continues this way. Takers cannot live to believe that we have infinite amount resources available to us. With 7 billion people living on this planet, the environment begins to become exhausted in providing resources. With the population booming throughout the world especially in Asian countries such as China and India, scientist have predicted that by 2050 the human population may be too big to feed. Not only that, research conducted shows that since 1971, takers use more resources that the environment can produce in a year before the year ends. Thus, humans are using resources that the future generation needs. One would argue that it might be time to go back to the primitive ways of ancestors. However, we are not able to and don’t want to. Leaver culture functioned effectively because the population at that period of time was relatively small and they didn’t know that there was another way of life that they could resort to until the Neolithic Revolution. In today's society, humans do not want to resort to the ways of life that our ancestors lived by because we know that we can simply grow food. However, we do go back to the leaver culture, the majority of the population would certainly not survive the new way of life. One can argue that because the majority of the population will die out due to the ne\ew way of life, we can live the life of the leavers. The Tree of Knowledge is another theme that is prevalent throughout the novel.
Ishmael proposes divergent story of Genesis that a Jew or Christian is usually familiar with. Ishmael denies that the Tree of Knowledge ever possessed the knowledge of good or evil and that humans were permitted from eating the fruit from it. The gods that had created the world were also in charge in determining who lived or died. However, the gods argued with each other to determine who lived or die. They came up with the resolution that they should not involve themselves in the natural succession of life through the food web because animals would curse the gods for what they have done. The Tree of Knowledge was never limited to humans to test their self-control. It was used by the gods to manipulate mankind. Once Adam ate the fruit, he believed that he had the knowledge of good and evil. However, he only had taken the responsibility of deciding which species died and life through the way of life. Thus, it enabled the fall of …show more content…
mankind. The story of the Tree of Knowledge connects with the ideology of sustainability in that it depicts that mankind has failed its responsibility to bear not only the natural succession of life but simply the stewardship that he was once entitled to. Takers are those individuals that live on the principle of good and evil they received from the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge while leavers live by the hands of the gods. Ishmael says that takers believe in the ideology that "the world belongs to man" while as leavers live by ideology that "man belongs to the world". Because of mankind thought he had the responsibility to bear who lived and died and how-to-live, man has completely destroyed our environment. Therefore, man is on its own verge of downfall as well. Daniel Quinn writes about the moral ethics that has driven the civilization of mankind and the ideology of sustainability through the theme of the culture of leavers and takers and the Tree of Knowledge.
Mankind simply has failed to do what he was entitled to do which was to be a steward of the earth. Man has developed a way of life that is completely not sustainable. The amount resources man uses completely depicts that future generations will not have any and there is a possibility that there might not be a generation after all if we continue to do so. Ishmael instantly became one of the most influential books on my mentality that I have ever read because it gave me a different outlook on the way that we live life. Society tells us that it right and just and there is nothing to worry about when we need to. It is time that we take on our roles to enforce sustainability. This generation is the only hope that we have because past generations have failed as well. We are one step closer to the end of it. I would recommend that anyone looking to practice to enforce sustainability read Ishmael because it is a must. We can either work to enforce sustainability or we have another option that firmly many do not agree with. We can believe in Elon Musk the greatest entrepreneur of our time. Elon firmly believes in sustainability, but damn knows for a fact that humans will never practice sustainable ways of life. Before the amount of resources run out, it is good time to go to Mars.
Musk and SpaceX plan to have cargo sent to Mars by 2022 which will confirm that water resources exist and other stuff. In 2024, Musk plans to send a crew to Mars to begin our colonization on another planet because our time is up on earth.
After his brief history, Ishmael shifts his attention to the creation. "A culture is a people enacting a story" (41), and the story of the Garden of Eden opened up new thoughts on man's transformation from dependent to independent beings. When Adam and Eve began their lives on earth, they fully depended on the gods for all their necessities. Just like all of the other animals in the garden, they followed the philosophy of "leavers" and left the question of who should live and who should die up to the gods. However, the serpent, a member of the "taker" group tempted Eve with fruit from a tree that would give them the knowledge of life and death. Eve, which means "life" (179) in turn, tempted Adam with the fruit. Although pre-warned that eating this forbidden fruit would kill man, Adam fell into temptation and his desire for life. Through this action, his eyes were partially opened to the gods' vision. However, this knowledge ultimately would lead to the fulfillment of the gods' warnings that "[the world's] doom was assured" (166). After man's realization, he placed himself in a category separate from the animals and beasts that continued to rely on the world's situation rather than themselves.
In Genesis 3, the Fall of human beings is described. The serpent asked Eve if there were any trees that Adam and Eve could not eat from in the garden. Eve told the serpent that God said that they could not eat the fruit from the tree or touch the tree in the middle of the garden. The serpent told Eve that they would not die, but they would be open to the knowledge of good and evil like God. When Eve and Adam ate from the tree in the middle of the garden, they were opened to the knowledge of good and evil (The New Oxford Annotated Bible: With the Apocrypha...
“And the Lord said, ‘But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die (KJV Gen. 2:17).’” In History there has always been a debate on whether or not knowledge is helpful or harmful, such is the debate in Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, a story in which society has banned books and shunned learning so all citizens will be oblivious to the nuclear war the government is raging in their own land. This is also the message in one of the most famous biblical stories in history, the story of Adam, Eve, and the Tree of Good and Evil which opened the eyes of Adam and Eve to see their own sins. The poem “Tree of Knowledge” by Bee Lovett quickly summarizes the story from Adam’s point of view. Both
“You will not surely die,” the serpent said to the woman. “For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be open, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis 3:4-5). Adam and Eve were told by God that they could eat from any other tree in the garden of Eden except for the tree in the middle of the garden. He warned them that if they ate it they would die. One day the serpent, satan, came along and told Eve that they would not die if they ate the fruit from that tree, only that their eyes would be open and they would be able to see good and evil and they would become like God. Adam and Eve then ate the fruit and were banished from the garden of Eden. They would come to know suffering and pain because of what they did. Before they ate the fruit Adam and Eve had no knowledge of good and evil, but once they ate the fruit the looming question of good and evil became something that would last forever.
God warned Adam not to eat the fruit of "the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil" (Genesis 2:15-17). The serpent persuaded Eve, who in turn persuaded Adam, to disobey this commandment.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Sustainability is becoming a major debate in the united states and in the world as a whole. People are becoming more conscious of their surroundings and want to conserve the environment in order to keep the Earth healthy and to maintain diversity among the environment. In Christian Weisser’s “Sustainability,” he goes on to explain what sustainability truly is. Weisser does a good job in using pathos to persuade a typical college student in the validity of sustainability.
The rise of humanity has become one of the most extreme events in Earth’s history. We have altered nature to fit our desires. However, at this rate, we will ultimately suffocate under our own weight. We are beginning to devour more than the Earth and nature can provide. Unless we scale back our dependence on Earth’s resources, our way of life is almost certainly doomed.
The Garden of Eden had all the fruit and vegetables they would want and/or need to live. All they had to do was tend to the garden, and have dominion over it and the animals that lived there. Now, in the garden, there was one specific tree that God instructed them to not eat. The tree was the tree of “the Knowledge of Good and Evil.”
In Genesis 2, God creates Ha-Adam with the breath of life, and placed the human like man in the Garden of Eve to be the caretaker. While in the garden, God gives Ha-Adam a command that he may eat from all the trees, expect one, the Tree of Knowledge and if he were to eat it he would die. God then splits Ha-Adam into two, a man and a woman. While the man and women are in the garden a serpent appeared and began to ask the women if God really said they could not eat of any tree, which she replied, they may not eat or touch in the middle on the garden, referring to the Tree of Knowledge. In Genesis 3, the woman takes the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge, in which her and Adam eat the fruit. God gives Adam a chance to admit what he had done, in
Within the Garden of Eden God placed two exquisite trees. Each quite different in its purpose, however both proved to play an integral role in the tale of man?s beginning. Perhaps the better known of the two, the tree of knowledge of good and evil, was the only one, which God imposed a contingency upon. ?You many freely eat of every tree of the garden; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of if you shall die.? Is this to imply that knowledge is perhaps more important and therefore more closely guarded than life?
God had created the luscious Garden of Eden and given the man and woman he created all the plants and animals they could ever want for food and also given them the gift of free will. His only request was that they not eat the fruit from a single tree, the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, which was located in the center of the garden. He warned them that if they ate from this tree, the consequences would be bad. There was a serpent in the tree, though, who tricked the woman Eve into eating the fruit, and she, in turn, had her husband Adam eat it. When God saw they had eaten the fruit, he was angered and deprived Adam and Eve from paradise and essentially cursed humanity.
“You may freely eat of every tree of the garden; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall die.” These are the words of God to Adam and Eve. A seemingly simple notion that Adam and Eve contravened after hearing the serpent’s persuasive appeal for power and godlike knowledge.
Humans are destructive. Not a lot of us think about how what we do affects the world around us. We almost act like we are the only ones on this planet. We go around polluting and destroying our world with no regard for our actions. The things that live out in the wild are paying the price for it. Every day that passes there is another animal or plant that is placed on an endangered list. This is happening at an alarming rate. Because of man’s desire to expand and conquer their surroundings, there are animals and plants that are on the brink of extinction that will not be around for our kids and future generations to enjoy if something is not done about it now. This problem has been going on for hundreds of years. There are animals and plants that can only been seen in paintings or early photography. It is because of our early ancestors that we have this problem today and we have to do more to prevent more animals and plants from disappearing forever.
Genesis creation story shows a God with knowledge in purposeful creation from a void. The awareness of good and evil acts like a moral compass that governs the behavior of human beings (McLaughlin 76). The effect of the knowledge trickles down to humankind since we were created in his image therefore impacted in inventions and modern discoveries. Genesis creation grants humanity the knowledge to be able to name the rest of nature like Adam who was tasked with identifying the animals and the plant in the Garden of Eden. Therefore, without the knowledge of how to subdue the earth, human beings would fail in the role of participating in God's work of creation (Page
Sustainability simply defined to me as balancing act between the development of sustainability is necessary for both planet Earth and humans to survive. This is reinforced in the World Commission on Environment and Development report (1987) that sustainable development must meet the needs of the present without compromising the well-being of future generations”. The Earth Charter Organization widened the idea of sustainability to respect for a culture of peace, universal human rights, nature, and economic justice (What is sustainability?, n.d.).