What Does Crystal Justify In 'A Rose For Emily'?

630 Words2 Pages

William Faulkner states, "So next day we all said, 'She will kill herself'; and we said it would be the best thing" (808). It is one of the many judgemental statements made in William Faulkner's "A Rose For Emily." Miss Emily Grierson isolates herself from the town of Jefferson when her father dies. Afterwards, she engages in a privacy that the townspeople observes. According to Willow D. Crystal, William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily" suggests that public and private are far from exclusive categories. I agree, but I would add that one should not judge someone based on his or her own assumptions.
I agree with Crystal's essay because she thoroughly supports and explains her claim by using multiple quotes from the story. Crystal's main claim is that public and private are far from exclusive categories. In " A Rose for Emily" the narrator states, "When Miss Emily Grierson died , our whole town went to her funeral: the men through a sort of respect for a fallen monument, …show more content…

As claimed by Crystal, "When she refuses to provide a reason why she wants to buy poison, the druggist scrawls “For rats” (809) across the package, literally and protectively overwriting her silence"(791). Although Crystal mainly argues the invasion of privacy shown in that statement, one could infer Faulkner's underlying theme based on the series of events following that statement. Evidently, after Emily had purchased the rat poison the townspeople stated,"So the next day we all said, “She will kill herself”; and we said it would be the best thing"( Faulkner 808). Later on in the story, Miss Emily Grierson dies, and while the townspeople believed that she was going to commit suicide with the rat poison, it was revealed that she had not committed suicide with the poison, but she had committed murder. She had murdered Homer, the man that was thought to be Miss Emily Grierson's

Open Document