Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysis of an invisible man
Critical analysis of an invisible man
Critical analysis of an invisible man
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Though-out Ridge’s novel we see a story that is much similar to that of Ridge’s life. Joaquin and Ridge were both educated. They both left home in search of a better life and both had to realize that life, because of their race, was already being shaped for them. The story of Joaquin was tragic yet romantic. It was dreamy and exciting. Ridge’s personal background helped shape the justification of violence and also romanticized the story of Joaquin Murieta to accommodate the much needed excitement missing in California.
Ridge, also known as Yellow Bird, starts his book off by telling his audience that the creation of his book was simply his duty to write it. Somebody needed to write the missing part of History. Ridge states that he has no
…show more content…
support of violence or the life of an outlaw, although he seems very interested in Murieta’s life. He admires Joaquin from the start and throughout the book he never stops. He states, “The character of this truly wonderful man was nothing more than a natural production of the social and moral condition of the country in which he lived” (Ridge 7). The book then introduces this amazing character, along with his one true love, Rosita. Ridge wanted to recreate how most people looked at a “foreigner.” He was educated and had the chance to try his luck in America. He had high hopes and expectations. Joaquin is pictured as being a dreamer and strong-willed. He thought very highly of the Americans. Ridge wanted his character to be starry eyed over the Americans to show his audience that Murieta was willing to befriend the Americans without ever being prejudice. Meeting only a couple, he assumed they must all be nice. He wanted to live among the winning side of the country. Once settled into America, he was indeed lucky, his mining claim turned out to hold a great fortune. However, that luck soon wore out and we now see how Joaquin’s life will be changed. Instead of the confident and well respected man people saw him as, his character was deeply overrun with hatred. This is due to a couple unexpected meetings with prejudice Americans. They not only took advantage of Rosita, but they killed his brother and publicly abused him, although he was innocent. This was the true turning point in his life. Joaquin is thrown into an unescapable life of an outlaw. “Yellow Bird, who as author openly declares himself Cherokee also shows us his hero appearing in all the glory of “his real features” (Jordan 14). Much of Joaquin’s beginning has a few similarities to Ridge’s. To start with, Ridge also had a few dreadful encounters with the Americans. Being a Cherokee-American was not ideal at this time. When he was young he was “Removed from his Cherokee homeland, and then forced to flee the relocated and chaotic Cherokee Nation” (Jordan 2). Ridge had to experience this hatred first hand. Hatred like this was probably confusing for him at first. Being treated as an animal just because of who you are can form a complex attitude towards his oppressors. Even those that do not torment him will still be seen as cruel people. Like, Joaquin, it had to happen to him more than once to really grasp his own hatred towards the Americans. Both Joaquin and Ridge saw the American people as possibly a positive influence for their lives, but they had to be proven wrong. This emotion was the driving force for Ridge’s book.
According to Kowalewski, “Ridge seems to have been torn between writing a moralizing indictment of Anglo imperialism and an action-filled potboiler sure to make money” (212). He built a character that was beaten down and torn away from a good life. He had no chance for any other life except being an outlaw. He created a fairytale based on the oppression seen to all races during this time. Despite the rich hatred, Ridge wanted to have a character be victorious, against all odds. Here was this handsome man that could never run away from bad luck yet, he also seems to have an advantage over others. Joaquin did all the things Ridge could never do. He was a writer not an outlaw. As Jordan puts it on page 13, “Yellow Bird’s novel is built upon a coherent systems of images.” These images are examples from his life. He had deep emotions against the Americans and the only way to prove that was by writing about. His background was correlated with Murietas life and through Murieta he had the opportunity to put the Americans in their place. No one was there to stop Murieta. He was the perfect character to help ease the pain Ridge had. Ridge clearly manipulated the truth in his novel. Joaquin possesses many skills and talents that were lacking by the Americans. Ridge did this to make his oppressors seem dumb and inferior. Jordan states on page 15, “Yellow Bird’s hero, with his “superior intelligence and education,” is constructed as …show more content…
the paragon of real civilization in a text where most Americans have “just sufficient civilization” to render them barely literate and racist.” The only way Ridge could get justice for what they did to him was to show them as being stupid. Ridge highly justified Joaquin’s violence. He justified it by showing Joaquin with no other way to live. As Ridge put it, “the tyranny of prejudice had reached their climax” and Joaquin was from that moment was forever changed (Ridge 15). Joaquin was made out to be innocent from the start. He was young and just looking for a good way to live his life. He did everything right, according to Ridge. It was not until the Americans came that he was recreated. He did not want to be an outlaw, but his soul was so angered that he had to release it. Ridge wants his audience to believe it was all the Americas fault. Because of their actions, Joaquin had to rethink his whole life. He wants his audience to have sympathy on Joaquin and to accept his actions as being reasonable. The violence in Joaquin’s life, stems from Ridge’s own life situation. In Ridge’s life he had to witness his father being stabbed by “hotheaded young braves” along with his grandfather and cousin. Which, happened to Rosita and Joaquin, when Americans forced them off their land. Rosita and Joaquin are together throughout the whole novel. Joaquin of course needs a heroine. Someone of his stature and noble character needed someone by his side. Ridge portrays Joaquin as being a brute when it comes to being an outlaw but when it comes to Rosita we see a tender man. Rosita and Joaquin would have been a beautiful couple if seen together. The way they are described, makes them seem untouchable. Their love is uncontainable. Joaquin, like every romance novel is the protector and Rosita is committed to him forever. When he reads that her brother is dead, he breaks the news ever so gently to her. He drops the paper and with a quivering lip and tearful eye he tells her. Then she falls into his chest and while he holds her, she cries with tears like “molten lead” (Ridge 77). This scene fits well with what Jordan states, “Many of Joaquin’s bandits are found reading romances as well as newspapers and other literature, and they frequently act as if they stepped out of a romance” (Jordan 15). It is true that Ridge balanced the violence with the romance. He wanted his readers to both fall in love with his characters and to want to be like them. Rosita loved Joaquin no matter what he does. Once he dies nothing between them changes. In the end she is, “Silently and sadly working out the slow task of a life forever blighted to her” (Ridge 240). Without Joaquin life is a chore and grueling work. It was not only Rosita that was forever devoted to someone. Many of the bandits have a woman that is unwilling to leave their side, even if death is guaranteed. An example of this is after Reyes Feliz was mauled by a bear and his “faithful girl” never left his side. Many of the women can also ride with the men, but can also be beautiful and eye-catching in jewelry at the same time. Ridge shows us what true love is. It is unfailing and is being true to one another even after death. He captures male audiences with the action and violence and gets woman audience with the romantic story of love in an unexpected place. Another way he shaped Joaquin to be more delicate was by how turned off he was at violence sometimes. He would feel badly for killing a good man, as with Ruddle (Ridge 44). He would try to stay away from killing someone whenever possible. He would even come clean or try to avoid killing them by telling them that he did not have bad intentions. He was invented to be sensitive and considerate. When he does have to kill he “regrets” it and terms it as “unnecessary cruelty” (Ridge 68). This is what makes him a hero in some way, he kills but only because he has to or to get justice from the wrong-doers. The life of Joaquin was full of violence, which was much different from Ridge’s.
The two had the same start in life. They had the same obstacles and both seemed to overcome them. These men were strong and brave. The only difference is how they individually handled life after hardship. Ridge and Joaquin at one point went from job to job. They both had a job working in the Gold Rush, which turned out to be hard for “foreigners” (Jackson xvii). Life after mining turned Ridge into a writer. The life for Joaquin after mining was outlawry. The Gold Rush played a big part in many people’s lives. It was a hard life and there was not much guarantee that you would make it big or make it at all. There was tension among many groups of races and in many cases would turn into violence. It was a time where drinking was out of control and there was not room for a love story. According to Jackson, “California might have developed its own folk hero sooner if gold mining had been a more romantic business” (xix). It was not a pretty scene at the mining camps or anywhere that had a slight involvement with the Gold Rush. Everywhere seemed to have a form of entertainment that came from their homeland besides California. Jackson states, “Californians were hunting for every hint of romance in their past…And the Murieta that Ridge had invented was as romantic a figure as the most doting Californian could ask for” (xxxix). The situation was in dire need for a swooning character to sweep everyone off
their feet. Someone had to rescue them out of their misery and that savior was Ridge. He knew just what to say to capture everyone’s attention. Although it took a while, his story finally caught on and encouraged more authors to recreate Joaquin Murieta. Ridge made a glamorous tale out of an ugly situation. He wrote his novel because he knew it would make it, since nothing similar existed. In conclusion, Ridge formed Murieta out of his emotions. He was a puppet to express how the Americans wronged him and others like him. His character was made out to be superior above most others. His story was mixed with violence and romance, which made the story impractical yet alluring at the same time. Ridge created a character that only could exist in a book. A hero that is willing to kill, yet is so tender at the same time. He recreated the Gold Rush to be a more desirable place to be. A love story that could withstand any turmoil was what he created for his audiences. Murieta is an image of everything Ridge wanted to be like. By creating Joaquin Murieta, Ridge was able to please audiences everywhere and gave peace to his own battered soul.
a.This document was written for Nonfiction lovers. The article, “John Rollin Ridge and Joaquín Murieta” has life learning experience that you can implement in your life. Joaquín is an innocent and honest man which results being punished for his honesty. Being an honest individual doesn 't always get you far in life but instead you can be persecuted which result of turning into criminal in society.
In two differing stories of departure, The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck and The Road by Cormac McCarthy, Steinbeck’s standard for a writer is met by the raw human emotions exhibited in the main characters’ success and defeat.
Most of Steinbeck’s work conveys a deeper meaning or message to the readers, and The Grapes of Wrath presents no exception, as redemption’s prevalence influences the growth of each character. Although the book ends with a tragic flood after the family has faced the loss of Rose of Sharon’s newborn baby, the novel still ends in happiness, since characters such as Jim Casy, Uncle John, Tom Joad, and Rose of Sharon attain redemption and in doing so, become saviors for migrant families. Steinbeck manifests the idea the migration did not necessarily implicate the Joads would find prosperity in the promised land of California, but would instead fulfill the quest for absolution, which results in their heroic
Griffin strikes all of these aspects in her essay. What is most compelling about the essay, however, is the way Griffin incorporated personal, family, and world history into a chilling story of narrative and autobiography, without ever losing the factual evidence the story provided. The chapter reads like an entire novel, which helps the audience to understand the concepts with a clear and complete view of her history, not needing to read any other part of the book. Two other authors, Richard Rodriguez, and Ralph Ellison, who write about their experiences in life can possibly be better understood as historical texts when viewed through the eyes of Griffin. Rodriguez explores his own educational history in his essay “The Achievement of Desire” and Ralph Ellison depicts his own journeys and personal growth in his essay, “An Extravagance of Laughter”. Both essays, which when seen through Susan Griffin’s perspective, can be reopened and examined from a different historical view, perhaps allowing them to be understood with a more lucid view of history and what it is really about.
One of the many characteristics that a hero needs to have is bravery. Cortez of course didn’t want what happen to happen, but he had the bravery to stand up to an Anglo sheriff to defend his brother. At the time that this happened, Anglos intimidated many Mexican-Americans who were living in Texas because of the tension that was there from the war. Mexican American were abused and mistreated because of the language barrier that wasthere was between them. This...
Each character in the novel is a vehicle for Matto de Turner's ideas about the Peruvian national model and her thoughts on possible changes. The main focus of the novel is on the plight of the native Indians. The story focuses on two main Indian families, yet throughout the novel their plights are generalised by the use of the terms of "the race" and "brothers born in adversity" so that the novel critiques the entire nation and its treatment of the native culture.
In the 1930s, America’s Great Plains experienced a disastrous drought causing thousands of people to migrate west. As their land was devastated by the Dust Bowl, deprived farmers were left with few options but to leave. The Grapes of Wrath depicts the journey of the Joads, an Oklahoma based family which decides to move to California in search of better conditions. Coming together as thirteen people at the start, the Joads will undertake what represents both a challenge and their only hope. Among them are only four women embodying every ages: the Grandma, the Mother and her two daughters, the pregnant Rose of Sharon and the young Ruthie. Appearing in Chapter Eight the mother, who is referred to as “Ma”, holds a decisive role in Steinbeck’s novel. She is, along with her son Tom (the main character of the book), present from the early stage of the story until its very end. We will attempt to trace back her emotional journey (I) as well as to analyze its universal aspects and to deliver an overall impression on the book (II).
Literary works are always affected by the times and places in which they are written. Those crafted in Western America often reflect conflicts that occurred between advancing civilization and the free spirited individual. The 1970’s was a particularly popular time for authors to introduce new ideas for living in the modern world. There are few authors who captured the essence and feeling of culture quite like Tom Robbins. Robbins comments on the differences and similarities between Western civilization and Eastern philosophies. His text offers philosophical and cultural meaning that is completely original. Certain beliefs are threaded through out the content of the story. He includes significant content reflecting the laws of physics; how motion and force affect the life process. Through the dialogue and action of his characters, Robbins illustrates how two very different ideals can coexist. Robbins intentions are to expand cultural perspectives and awareness through his novels. His use of metaphors and stylistic diction emphasizes further how thoughtful and awesome his work is. Tom Robbins writing offers an insightful perspective into cultural themes of our modern world.
In literature as in life, people often find that they must make difficult choices in order to survive. The reasons behind their decisions and the results of their subsequent actions affect our opinion of them. In the Grapes of Wrath, written by John Steinbeck, the author portrayed situations where two main characters became involved. The nature of their choices, the reasons behind their decisions, and the results that followed affected them greatly. However, the choices that they made were surmounted successfully. Ma Joad and Tom Joad are two strong characters who overcame laborious predicaments. Their powerful characteristics helped to encourage those that were struggling.
Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath is a realistic novel that mimics life and offers social commentary too. It offers many windows on real life in midwest America in the 1930s. But it also offers a powerful social commentary, directly in the intercalary chapters and indirectly in the places and people it portrays. Typical of very many, the Joads are driven off the land by far away banks and set out on a journey to California to find a better life. However the journey breaks up the family, their dreams are not realized and their fortunes disappear. What promised to be the land of milk and honey turns to sour grapes. The hopes and dreams of a generation turned to wrath. Steinbeck opens up this catastrophe for public scrutiny.
To contrast truth and fiction, the author inserts reminders that the stories are not fact, but are mere representations of human emotion incommunicable as fact. O'Brien's most direct discussion of truth appears in Good Form. He begins with, "It's time to be blunt," and goes on to say that everything in the book but the very premise of a foot soldier in Vietnam is invented. This comes as a shock after reading what seems to be a stylized presentation of fact. In the sequence of Speaking of Courage, followed by Notes, O'Brien adds a second dimension of truth to a story so vivid that the reader may have already accepted it as the original truth.
Incomprehensibly, The Grapes of Wrath is both a praiseworthy radical investigation of the abuse of horticultural workers and the climaxes in the thirties of a verifiably racist focusing on whites as victimized people. The novel barely specifies the Mexican and Filipino migrant workers who commanded the California fields and plantations into the late thirties, rather intimating that Anglo-Saxo...
The Grapes of Wrath is a novel that shows a nation when it is at one of its lowest points economically. During the 1930’s the great depression too place and this story is a depiction of what many families who owned farmland during that time went though. The Joads were a average farming family in Oklahoma until the dust bowl hit. During the dust bowls there was always dirt in the air because all of the farm land had dried up and the land was left as a pile of dry dirt. Because they were no longer able to farm the government took many farms right out from under people and left them with nowhere to turn. The Joads were no exception to this. Tom Joad had just gotten out of the penitentiary for killing a man when he found out what had happened to his family in his absence. When he finally found them, they were all packed up to go to California. On the way to California they lost both Grandma and Grandpa. This shows what a sacrifice they were forced to make because they had nowhere else to turn. Once they get to California they find out that all of the handbills had been wrong and there was hardly enough work there for all the immigrants that were coming from all over the Midwest. The Joads certainly see the worst and the best that California has to offer. From locally run farms with bad cops to government run camps with running water and enough of everything to go around. With they had some luck along they way the Joads eventually run out of money and are forced to take refuge in a barn. While in this barn they find a man who is dying and because Rose of Sheran has unused milk she breast feeds the man. The novel ends with this sentence “She looked up and across the barn, and her lips came together and smiled mysteriously.” This is suc...
In the novel we see a change in the hero. There is a move away from the traditional American hero who was the independant, cowboy image, the cowboy represented a Capitalist American society. While the representation of the hero in The Grapes of Wrath was an ordinary person that works hard. The glamour of the Cowboy hero is gone by the 1930s. People are not being encouraged to think for themselves anymore instead they are encouraged to work hard together. This is seen in the Grapes of Wrath.
Kaplan, Amy. “The Spectacle of War in Crane’s Revision of History”. Bloom, Harold ED. New