Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative rhetorical analysis
A proposal for rhetorical analysis
Rhetorical analysis of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparative rhetorical analysis
Marianna Ruvinov
10/5/17
AP Language and Composition
Period: 4
Rhetorical Devices in “Quit India” Speech
In Mahatma Gandhi’s iconic “Quit India” speech, he uses a plethora of rhetorical devices in order to emphasize and develop the credibility of his purpose. The primary purpose in this speech is to inform the general public on the discrimination that India receives by other countries, and to explain the independence that India strives for. Gandhi initiates the building of his credibility by using his own personal experiences as a way to reel his audience into the reality of the Quit India Movement, as well as effectively depict the brutality he faced while there. Similarly, toward the end of his speech, Gandhi’s strive for appealing to the audience through logic was also thoroughly effective.
…show more content…
This is found when Gandhi goes on to explain the thoughts he had in prison, and the personal suffering he went through there, as a result of the discrimination. This appeals to the audience ethically, because of the real event that happened. By mentioning his time in prison, people can feel that devastating things have happened consequently to the abuse India has faced from Britain, and that Gandhi was incarcerated for the cause he is fighting so strongly for. When the audience hears of the atrocity that many people faced just for standing up for what they so strongly believed in, that would result in a convinced audience, due to them knowing about the harsh reality of the Quit India
Mohandas Gandhi was born into a Hindu family of the Vaisya caste. This was the third ranking caste in the class structure of Hinduism. This class was for farmers and merchants. The whole system was so complex that in Gandhi’s lifetime it had begun to disintegrate. Gandhi’s father and grandfather were not farmers or merchants. They were prime ministers of the tiny principality of Porbandar in Gujarat. Mohandas was extremely shy. He rushed to and from school, too nervous to talk to any of his classmates. Then a pretty and strong-willed girl was married to him by an arranged marriage at the age of 13. Her name was Kasturbai. A marriage at this age was typical in Hindu custom. He was a strict husband and kept control over actions. Kasturbai disliked this. They didn’t spend more than the first five years of their marriage together, since it was typical for the girl to visit her family. At this point in his life, he was very depressed. He was little and suffered fears that didn’t bother his wife. An athletic and older boy who was Muslim fascinated him. He told Mohandas to eat meat if he wanted to become bigger and stronger. He said the Indians were weak and small people, because they didn’t eat meat, and this is why the British, who did, had the strength to rule over them. This was against his religion, but he tried anyway. He ate the meat in secrecy, but after a few meals he stopped. He didn’t like the taste of meat and fe...
To begin with, one must find a peaceful approach to defeat discrimination. According to the text, on “from Letter to Viceroy, Lord Irwin”, Gandhi stated “My ambition is no less than to convert the British through non-violence and thus make them see the wrong they have done to India.” This evidence shows that Gandhi wants to be heard without using violence. Another example is on lines 17-24 which says “It has impoverished the dumb millions by a system of progressive exploitation…reduced politically to serfdom…sapped foundations of our culture…degraded us spiritually.” This evidence reveals that Gandhi is showing the effect the British is having a right now in India.
While the government will attempt to control you, and generate all the decisions they think are right, the people need to stand against them, for the reason that they need to think for themselves and speak up in order for them to have their freedom. Each speaker challenges the listeners to think for themselves instead of letting the government think for them. However, each speaker uses different concepts on how to convince the people to genuinely think for themselves. Furthermore, they show the audience on how to resist the government. Thoreau and Gandhi had similar ways on why and how to resist the government.
He showed how he believed that in order to not support evil, one must not succumb to violence. Gandhi closed by giving the judge and the assessors [of the court] two choices: to resign their jobs and therefore separate themselves from what Gandhi called evil (most likely the British Empire). They would only do this, he said, if they strongly disagree with the laws that Gandhi was accused of, or if they believed Gandhi to be innocent. The other choice was to punish Gandhi according to the law, showing that they agree with the laws and believe that are beneficial to the
Whereas Thoreau’s eyes were opened to the “summer soldiers” unwilling to persevere with him through the hard times, Gandhi had 60,000 other people go to jail with him (Thoreau 281; “Dandi”) Gandhi also rallied those people to continue the cause long after he had been arrested, choosing to believe that they would not give up when it became difficult (Bush 69). Gandhi volunteered to be a stretcher-bearer in the British war against the Zulu Kingdom, and supported the drafting of Indians, violating Thoreau’s belief that if one cannot completely eradicate a wrong, they should wash their hands of it and refuse to give it any kind of support (271; Bush 51). Also, Gandhi himself was the leader of the National Indian Congress, a political party, while Thoreau believed one needed to withdraw from the government completely (Thoreau 275; Bush 39). Many of their differences were defined by their time and their
To begin with, Mahatma Gandhi was a man who stood up for the less fortunate people in the world. In passage one, it states that “ Mahatma Gandhi didn’t have to walk endless miles and go without eating for days.” The text is stating that , He didn’t have to abandon his daily life to declare to the world. He chose to stand up for the populations and tell them what was right. It also states that, he grew up in a rich and wealthy family. This
...es of past leaders Gandhi gained new perspective and subsequently avoided repeating the past; this lead him to attempt to embark upon a new path--one perceived as better for India. None of this would have been possible without the perspective gained through studying India’s brutal past. Subsequently his efforts and strategies were later emulated by other civil rights activists, effectively impacting the general society. Clearly, the perspective gained through looking back on one’s mistake would be impossible without adversity, which serves as the origin for remediation; society would not be able to progress without certain duress.
Knowing and understanding the author’s purpose, we see where he is coming from and what his “point of view” is. We see that the author is someone that does not agree with the activities that occur in the native prison. It makes the author feel uncomfortable with the establishment and its procedures.
She has criticized the caste system, the Indian government, and now, the United States, which threatens to become the newest world hegemon. Though her opinions are not indicative of those held by the greater Indian population, she serves the useful function of pushing rhetoric to the left, and, in doing so, raises many of the crucial issues that India must address in today’s world. “Not again” is an article criticizing the leaders of America and their foreign policy, which she sees as full of reductionist dichotomies and a thinly veiled attempt to propagate corporate capitalism. As she says in “Not again,” “Wars are never fought for altruistic reasons” (3). Though Roy is clearly denouncing the United States government in her article, the hidden message is the implication that this rhetoric—and action—by the United States can have for developing countries, among them
In conclusion Gandhi’s background made him who he was, giving him an idea of how to get India’s independence, and his impact on India help people realize you can fight with knowledge and nonviolence to change a way of life. What makes a person strong and brave it’s the person who works hard to make something right.
Lastly, Gandhi continued to struggle with the satyagraha belief and was willing to devote his time on demanding the British to “quit India.” However, despite being imprisoned for this campaign, Gandhi aroused upheaval from the Indians who insisted the British to remove Gandhi from captivity. After the execution of the Salt March, the events that followed supported Gandhi’s philosophy on the satyagraha movement and further brought India closer to its independence from the British colonization. Works Cited Furbee, Mary and Mike Furbee. The Importance of Mohanda Gandhi.
Gandhi is motivated by religious means; he believes that everyone is equal in God’s eyes. He gets involved in several movements for equality, and he stresses non-violence very strongly. The Indians are very mad because British rule continues to limit their rights. They are supposed to all get fingerprinted, and their marriage laws are invalid. Gandhi’s followers vow to fight their oppressors to the death, but he discourages them from violence.
When Gandhi was insulted by an English barber, he must have thought about how painful it is to be insulted by a fellow human being. The feeling of pain made him think about the cause. He found that the pain was caused by a custom that had no respect for humanity which, in turn, made him think about the custom of untouchability and discrimination of the lowly castes in his own country. However, the most important thing was being ashamed of inhuman deeds of one’s ancestors. This is what ‘sticking to truth is’.
"A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when we step out from the old to the new, when an age ends, and when the soul of a nation, long suppressed, finds utterance." -Jawarhalal Nehru
(Bio.com.) As a result, the British imprisoned more than 60,000 people. A year later, Gandhi accepted a truce and called off the civil disobedience movement. (“Gandhi, Mahatma”)