The Rhetorical Analysis Of Gandhi's Speech

1102 Words3 Pages

Gandhi’s speech on the eve of his historic march on March 11, 1930, was intended as his last speech to his followers. He highlighted what his followers should do in the event that he was arrested for his crimes. They were to continue to try to attain Swaraj (self-governance, i.e. the country rules itself) with non-violence and truth. Instead of violence, he wanted them to cause civil disobedience by breaking small laws, such as owning and selling illegal salts, as well as purchasing or making them. He wanted the employees of the Government (British rule in India) to stop working in protest, in an attempt to undermine it. Gandhi asked for the taxpayers, and all who were cooperating with the Government to stop cooperating, doing things such as not sending their children to public schools or keeping titles. He also asked for them to have self-confidence in the goal of Swaraj, and to become leaders, while stressing non-violence and truth. Gandhi also asked his followers to continue to follow local leaders; to ensure that leadership at all levels in India was not changed all at once. At the end of his speech Gandhi tells his followers that is they are always truthful and non-violent while trying to make India self-governing, they will always be victorious, even if …show more content…

He showed how he believed that in order to not support evil, one must not succumb to violence. Gandhi closed by giving the judge and the assessors [of the court] two choices: to resign their jobs and therefore separate themselves from what Gandhi called evil (most likely the British Empire). They would only do this, he said, if they strongly disagree with the laws that Gandhi was accused of, or if they believed Gandhi to be innocent. The other choice was to punish Gandhi according to the law, showing that they agree with the laws and believe that are beneficial to the

Show More
Related

  • Mahatma Gandhi Dbq Essay

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gandhi served 2,338 days in prison -- 3.5 years-- just to prove that violence would never be the answer. When Gandhi heard that his fell Indian protesters had been sentenced to three months in prison he stated, “ If these men had committed an offense, I had committed a greater offense and I therefore asked the Magistrate to impose upon me the heaviest penalty…. I well remembered that I … did not feel the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box” (Document C). This proves that Gandhi was more than willing to prove to the British -- ruling India -- that he

    Read More

  • Mohandas Gandhi`s Use of Nonviolent Methods to Achieve Independence

    3658 Words  | 8 Pages

    The mission of Gandhi’s life was to help the people of India free themselves from British rule. Many people have struggled for independence. They have fought bloody battles or used terrorism in an attempt to achieve their goals. Gandhi’s revolution was different. He succeeded as an independence leader with the use of nonviolent methods. The young Mohandas Gandhi did not seem as a boy that would become a great leader. He changed as he studied in Britain and practiced in South Africa. He fought for the rights of Indians in both South Africa and India. Gandhi believed that all people in the world are brothers and sisters. He didn’t hate the English. Actually, he saw a lot that was good about them. His nonviolent means of revolution was referred to as satyagraha, which is a combination of two Sanskrit words, satya, meaning truth and love, plus agraha, meaning firmness. Many people were influenced by satyagraha.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Winston Churchill's Speech

    572 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Hitler is a monster of wickedness, insatiable in his lust for blood and plunder” (Churchill). These are the words of Winston Churchill, who was the British Prime Minister. Churchill, in my opinion, is the most effective political leader when it comes to power of language, manipulation, and words. Despite being known as a great speaker, the speech he made after Germany invaded Russia was what really showed how powerful he is. He used the elements language, words, and manipulation to make the people understand his side.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Winston Churchill's Speech

    1044 Words  | 3 Pages

    During 1931, a second grand war begin with national powers uniting together. Many nations instantly took arms, but the US decided to stay neutral. As a result, European countries established a new flourishing fear of being overthrown by eastern communist foes(“World”). Then the dreadful event on December 6, 1941, caused the US to reconsider its own stance on the war. Allied Powers realized their opportunity to use Pearl Harbor to gain a chance to determine their own fate in war. On December 26, 1941, the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, presented a speech eventually known as “Masters of Our Fate” to the US Senate and the House of Representatives(“Winston”). Through the use of esoteric rhetorical questions, vivid metaphors,

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Malala's Speech

    712 Words  | 2 Pages

    Being shot in the head by Taliban did not stop Malala for advocating for the right to education of children. Through her heroic exploits, she received a Nobel Peace Prize on December 10, 2014. This speech was delivered by her during the award ceremony. The speech constitutes everything that Malala stands for. She perfectly provided her background, motivation, and work, along with being grateful towards everyone involved with her in the speech. As an avid speaker, she has also used some rhetorical tactics to capture the attention of her listeners and make sure her point gets through everyone’s mind.

    Read More

  • Mahatma Gandhi Rhetorical Analysis

    1265 Words  | 3 Pages

    While the government will attempt to control you, and generate all the decisions they think are right, the people need to stand against them, for the reason that they need to think for themselves and speak up in order for them to have their freedom. Each speaker challenges the listeners to think for themselves instead of letting the government think for them. However, each speaker uses different concepts on how to convince the people to genuinely think for themselves. Furthermore, they show the audience on how to resist the government. Thoreau and Gandhi had similar ways on why and how to resist the government.

    Read More

  • On Women's Right To Vote By Susan B Anthony Analysis

    517 Words  | 2 Pages

    One way is to smash the head of the man who perpetrates injustice and to get your own head smashed in the process.” Gandhi said there are two ways to right a wrong, a violent route or a non-violent route. He chose the non-violent route and spoke for the people who could not. In his speech “On Civil Disobedience”, it says “But so long as there is yet life i these our bones, we will never comply with your arbitrary laws”. Gandhi represented the individuals that thought the laws were illogical and unreasonable, and said they would not obey these discriminatory rules. By Gandhi speaking for many other people, proves the importance of taking a stand, even if it is a non-violent

    Read More

  • Analyzing The Rhetorical Situation Of Rfk's Speech

    992 Words  | 2 Pages

    Robert F. Kennedy was campaigning for the Democratic nomination for president of the United States on April 4, 1968. He was on his way to Indianapolis, Indiana for a rally that was being held in an inner-city black neighborhood. On the way to the rally, Kennedy was informed of the murder of Martin Luther King Jr. Once he arrived he delivered his emotional impromptu speech to the crowd instead of the campaign speech that the crowds expected.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Anil Seth's Speech

    479 Words  | 1 Pages

    Anil Seth, a neuroscientist, discusses the workings of the human brain to show us that what we see may not be the reality we believe to be living in. The brain uses sensory ques to interpret information and produce the perspective that we see before us. However, these interpretations are based off the brain’s best guess given these ques. In short, the brain warps perception constantly from the information of the outside world and the prior information retained. Using props, photos and videos, Seth showed how easily our perceptions can be altered. For instance, the fake hand experiment showed that the brain can perceive an object as a part of the body because of its appearance, location, and touch. Seth was able to convey this idea through a combination of his speech, body language, and visual aids. Seth’s speech is an excellent example of how to properly use novel, memory, and emotional elements to produce a thought provoking and notable speech.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Nelson Mandela's Speech

    500 Words  | 1 Pages

    In 1990, South Africa became a totalitarian state. Apartheid is still in full effect. There is extensive racial violence in the streets. The country is economically suffering from sanctions from many other countries in protest of Apartheid.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Rfk Speech

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    On April 4th, 1968, Martin Luther King Jr., a hero to the United States was assassinated. He was a leader that represented the ideas of unity and peace for people of all colors, religions, and ethnicities. Robert F. Kennedy persuades his predominantly african american audience to act responsibly by mentioning Martin Luther King Jr.’s recent death at the time and the legacy he left behind, describing the state of the country during 1968, and how we need to move forward as a nation.

    Read More

  • Mahatma Gandhi and The Salt March

    1436 Words  | 3 Pages

    In an effort to help free India from the British rule, Mahatma Gandhi once again contributed to a protest against salt taxes, known as the Salt March. This protest advocated Gandhi’s theory of satyagraha or nonviolent disobedience as the nation came together on March 12, 1930 to walk the 241 miles long journey to the shores of Dandi to attain salt. Although some Indians criticized Gandhi for not achieving direct independence from the Raj or British rule, Gandhi’s execution of the Salt March helped to create a stronger nation for the Indians to live in. Gandhi motivated the Indians to act robustly against the injustices of the salt taxes through nonviolent means. This caused Gandhi to create a temporary compromising pact between Gandhi and the British viceroy over the turmoil created by the salt taxes. In addition, Gandhi drew a plan known as the “Quit India” resolution, whose immediate effect brought India closer to obtaining independence than before.

    Read More

  • Gandhi Movie Summary

    534 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gandhi is motivated by religious means; he believes that everyone is equal in God’s eyes. He gets involved in several movements for equality, and he stresses non-violence very strongly. The Indians are very mad because British rule continues to limit their rights. They are supposed to all get fingerprinted, and their marriage laws are invalid. Gandhi’s followers vow to fight their oppressors to the death, but he discourages them from violence.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Quit India Speech

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Quit India Movement was an important movement for independence although it did not gain Indian independence at that exact moment. It was a Segway into to the movement that changed Indian lives. Gandhi launched his “Quit India movement in August 1942 in Bombay. This speech was to (encourage) Indians to wage one last struggle for independence or die trying. he repudiates. Many claim that the Quit India speech by Gandhi was a Civil Disobedience Movement that was a huge launch for independence. Throughout Gandhi’s speech he requested the withdrawal of British rule from India through mass nonviolent protest asking desperately for the freedom for (of) the Indian People. Throughout Gandhi’s Passionate speech for freedom he proclaimed that “every Indian who desires there freedom and strives must be his own guide. And that “every Indian should consider there selves a free man. This speech was mostly described as an Inspirational and motivating speech that is to persuade Indians to seek their freedom. In Gandhi’s speech he had told Indians to follow non-violent civil disobedience. He told the multitudes and masses to act as an independent nation that would soon follow freedom for their people. This movement that Gandhi had given the call “Quit India” to the British and pressed Indians with his emotive slogan ‘Do or Die’. It was during this time that Gandhi made a statement: "We shall either free India or die in the attempt; we shall not live to see the perpetuation of our slavery". His goal and aims throughout his speech was to encourage the British government to negotiate through determined, but passive resistance.

    Read More

  • Gandhi's intent with Hind Swaraj

    1782 Words  | 4 Pages

    The intent of Gandhi in Gandhi's inten was to remove the India he loved from trusting in the greatness and infallibility of Western Civilization and to encourage her to take pride in India’s own identity as a civilization and culture. His enthusiasm slightly exaggerates the grandeur of India and accounts for some margin of error in his esteem for his homeland, but Gandhi’s overall message is sound and wise; India must be proud of her heritage and mindful of sacrifice, for by these means, true freedom and true swaraj will be reached.

    Read More

More about The Rhetorical Analysis Of Gandhi's Speech

Open Document