What Are The Pros And Cons Of Mercy Killing

1470 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Euthanasia ethical and moral issues

Mercy Killing As I have studied mercy killing through research and assignments I realized there is more to it than I thought. Mercy killing is taking someone’s life without the patient’s permission. It happens when someone feels that death is in the patient’s best interest to relieve pain or suffering. While conducting my research I found that another word for mercy killing is euthanasia, which I will be using periodically throughout my paper. I have research many views on the topic and I learned that most of them are due to personal life matters. I am going to present the pros and cons of mercy killing,
First I am going to state the pros of mercy killing and why each of them are important to people. According to www.english-online.at everyone …show more content…

For example, merry killing is legalized in the Netherlands and they have only had a few small problems. To make the system work correctly laws have to be made that will distinguish between euthanasia and murder. Next I am going to present a few views on the cons of mercy killing. According to “the book” euthanasia is a direct violation of The Value of Life Principle. The principle states that “human life should be preserved, protected, and valued; sometimes referred to as the Sanctity of Life principle”. When mercy killing takes place it involves taking the life of an innocent person. No matter what the situation murder is murder, especially in the mercy killing situation because the patient does not have the decision to take their life or not.
The domino argument also takes place against mercy killing. If the patient is unresponsive and they cannot make a decision for themselves someone has to make a life/death decision in their place. The question is; who actually has the right to say the plug can be pulled or that no other medical procedures should be done to try and prolong the patient’s life. Who is the one that is allowed to make the decision of “ending” the life of another person when that person has no say so in the matter? The patient may be considered unimportant or meaningless to one person but to another their life may be …show more content…

According to www.bbc.uk most Christians are not for euthanasia because they believe that each individual’s life is given by God. Participating in mercy killing would mean that the natural process of dearth is no longer available. God made mankind in his image and everyone is valuable to him. People do not look like him but he gives us the opportunity to understand good from bad and he wants us to make good decisions in life. Whether someone has a physical handicap, mental ill, or in a vegetative state of mind their value is the same as someone with no disability. In Gods eye each and every person is equal and has a purpose in

Show More
Related

  • Bonnie Steinbock The Morality Of Euthanasia

    1590 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this essay, I will discuss whether euthanasia is morally permissible or not. Euthanasia is the intention of ending life due to inevitable pain and suffering. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words “eu,” which means good, and “thanatosis, which means death. There are two types of euthanasia, active and passive. Active euthanasia is when medical professionals deliberately do something that causes the patient to die, such as giving lethal injections. Passive euthanasia is when a patient dies because the medical professionals do not do anything to keep them alive or they stop doing something that was keeping them alive. Some pros of euthanasia is the freedom to decide your destiny, ending the pain, and to die with dignity. Some cons

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment: A Perspective from Death Row

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    “A Death in Texas” by Steve Earle is the true-life story of a friendship that occurred over ten

    Read More

  • The Hippocratic Oaths: The Use Of Euthanasia

    1678 Words  | 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a word derived from Greek that has the etymological meaning of an easy death through the alleviation of pain (Moreno, 1995). Through the course of history, the signification of the term has changed and evolved in many different definitions. A useful definition of euthanasia on which we will base this essay, is named ‘mercy killing’, which signifies deliberately putting an end to someone’s life to avoid further suffering, as stated by Michael Manning in 1998. The euthanasia debate possesses a strong significance in our modern society. A discussion conducted by both scholars and politicians is going on whether physicians have the right to hasten the death of an individual by the administration of poison. In this essay

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    For example, if a person is in a coma and the family believes that they will not revive, then the family should allow the patient to die because the patient is basically dead already. Furthermore, if someone is in really bad pain, then they should be able to choose euthanasia because they are suffering a lot. They might not want to die because they acknowledge it would make their family member sad, but on the other hand they are hurting and can only think about is the pain. That is when I strongly agree with Hooker that people should be able to choose euthanasia and that being euthanised is for the best. In my opinion, having a law permitting euthanasia is good because it means that the person can take control of their own life. It would be up to them whether they want to be euthanised or not, in both good and bad conditions. Just having the option can be beneficial to some because it is like having the freedom to choose to live or die. Therefore, If I was sick, I would like to have a law that permits me to choose euthanasia, because I could decide whether it is the best decision for me or

    Read More

  • Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia - Pro and Con

    2040 Words  | 5 Pages

    Euthanasia - Pro and Con & nbsp; Abstract & nbsp; This paper will define Euthanasia and assisted suicide.  Euthanasia is often confused with and associated with assisted suicide, definitions of the two are. required.  Two perspectives shall be presented in this paper.  The first perspective favor euthanasia or the "right to die," the second perspective. favor antieuthanasia, or the "right to live".  Each perspective shall. endeavor to clarify the legal, moral and ethical ramifications or aspects of euthanasia. & nbsp; Thesis Statement & nbsp; Euthanasia, also mercy killing, is the practice of ending a life so as to.

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

    2104 Words  | 5 Pages

    This paper will examine the pros and cons of the death penalty. Is it a deterrent or is that a myth. Does it give the family of the victim peace or does it cause them to suffer waiting for appeal after appeal. What are the forms of execution and any evidence of them being cruel and usual punishment. Is the death penalty fair if there are glaring, disparities in sentencing depending on geographic location and the color of the offender and victim’s skin?

    Read More

  • Mercy Killing In Of Mice And Men

    422 Words  | 1 Pages

    Mercy killing is the act of taking someone’s life painlessly. Victims of mercy killing “include persons who are in a vegetative state or those who suffer from an incurable and painful disease or condition.” People argue and refute mercy killing whether it is acceptable or not. It is neither acceptable nor wrong, arguably it is required to be a necessity when dealing with cases when there are no other options than surviving in the world in misery. In Of Mice and Men, John Steinbeck’s character, Lennie, mentally ill, has committed a treacherous act of murder by mere accident because he was panicked. He is mercy killed by his close friend and sort of master, George, so that he will no longer be in misery and suffering. Mercy killing is a

    Read More

  • Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

    1758 Words  | 4 Pages

    Those against it are equally worried about the victim’s situation in where their lives are taken away without their consent and at the same time, the possibility of a recovery. However, just because something is not accepted by society does not mean it is wrong, as the pro side of involuntary Euthanasia mentions, it would end with the victims’ pain by giving them a peaceful death. The reason to keep someone alive is to give him/her a new opportunity to fight for an improvement, if there no such thing the best option, although the hardest too, is to let the person rest in a better place, the positive fact about practicing Euthanasia is that the organs of the victim will save a life. On the other hand, a good effect of keeping someone alive is that the family will still see their loved one. Besides, they will save many legal problems because of Euthanasia still illegal in many countries. Both sides can agree that their cases in where their beliefs do not fit, as an example for the ones that support involuntary Euthanasia, if there a possibility to a recover they cannot kill the patient, they must keep him/her alive until the doctors said something different. In comparison, an exception for the con side that does not support involuntary

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    So let’s say this terminally ill patient is already in a vulnerable position whether it is because of family pressures, and/or mental stress from it all. They could also have a medically trained professional swaying them to take their life as well. Physicians are looked up too, which makes this scenario seem as though it could happen so easily. But this claim would be similar to saying that laws against selling contaminated food are government mandated starvation.

    Read More

  • Egnisia And Religion: The Views Of Euthanasia

    2210 Words  | 5 Pages

    ​Euthanasia is and will always be one of the leading ethical issues present in the world. There are strong arguments present on both sides of the issue including that of one of the most influential institutions on the planet; the Catholic Church. The Church has, and always will be against the killing of a human being. This applies to euthanasia: “An action or omission which of itself and by intention causes death, with the purpose of eliminating all suffering.” (Pope John Paul II - Evangelium Vitae). The Church also refers to euthanasia as “assisted suicide” and the “mercy killing”. “Whatever its motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable. Thus an act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering constitutes a murder gravely contrary to the dignity of the human person and to the respect due to the living God, his Creator. The error of judgment into which one can fall in good faith does not change the nature of this murderous act, which must always be forbidden and excluded.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church – 2277).

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Pros And Cons

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    Physician-Assisted Suicide is assisted suicide from a physician to a person to make it as painless and dignified as possible. There is also Euthanasia, which is to end a person life so they don’t have to go through any more pain and suffering without the patients consent. As of right now, only Montana, Oregon, Vermont and Washington have legalized Physician-Assisted suicide. To be eligible for Physician-assisted suicide, a patient must have a terminally ill disease. There are many pros and cons in this if you are having unbearable pain and want to end the suffering.

    Read More

  • A Defense of Euthanasia

    1271 Words  | 3 Pages

    More than likely, a good majority of people have heard about euthanasia at least once in their lifetime. For those out there who have been living under a rock their entire lives, euthanasia “is generally understood to mean the bringing about of a good death – ‘mercy killing’, where one person, ‘A’, ends the life of another person, ‘B’, for the sake of ‘B’.” (Kuhse 294). There are people who believe this is a completely logical scenario that should be allowed, and there are others that oppose this view. For the purpose of this essay, I will be defending those who are suffering from euthanasia.

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of Death Penalty

    623 Words  | 2 Pages

    The death penalty has been an issue of debate for several years. Whether or not we should murder murderer’s and basically commit the same crime that they are being killed for committing. People against the death penalty say that we should not use it because of that very reason. They also make claims that innocent people who were wrongly convicted could be killed. Other claims include it not working as a deterrent, it being morally wrong, and that it discriminates. Some even claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment. I would like to shed light on the issue and inform everyone as to why we should keep the death penalty and possibly even use it more than we do now.

    Read More

  • Religious Tradition view of Euthanasia

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Christian view of Euthanasia is that it is wrong. They understand, the pain and emotional suffering, caused in the case of terminally ill, but believe that a hospice is a better solution and that to commit Euthanasia is murder and a degrading act upon human life.

    Read More

  • Euthanasia: Not Morally Acceptable

    1644 Words  | 4 Pages

    The term of ‘mercy killing’ sounds very contradictory. Mercy, by definition, is a kind or forgiving attitude toward somebody that you have the power to harm or right to punish. As a trait exhibited by generous people, mercy is considered to be a virtue which we ought to pursue. On the other hand, killing, taking the life of other or oneself, is thought to be almost always wrong, and is condemned universally in most cases.

    Read More

More about What Are The Pros And Cons Of Mercy Killing

Open Document