What Are The Negative Effects Of British Imperialism

702 Words2 Pages

Vonnegut Haring Imperialism in India The East India company took over India after the Mughals collapsed. They created an army of Indian soldiers called sepoys and used them to control India. Although the sepoys were useful, they were dangerous. As the British governor of Bombay stated that they were “a delicate and dangerous machine, which a little mismanagement may easily turn against us.” India was also being eyed by the British government not just for its profit but for its potential. Later, India was referred to as the “brightest jewel in the crown.” The British laid down the foundation of a modern country for India introducing police, employing many Indians and educating Indians in British schools. On the other hand the British took complete control of India, took most of the natural resources and left the majority of India uneducated. …show more content…

The British established the framework for India’s army, police and justice system (Lalvani). The police however, massacred 400 Indian civilians at Amritsar (Gandhi). This shows that the police were not there to protect but to control the Indian people. Lalvani says that the respect between the British and the Indians allowed a peaceful transition from British rule to Indian independence. But there wasn’t a peaceful transition (Gandhi). In fact it was especially bloody with over 1 million estimated deaths between the civil war with Hindus and Muslims (Gandhi). This was because the British had caused tension between the two for more control and eventually they snapped having brutal battles (Gandhi). Because the British had been so desperate for control, they killed thousands of

Open Document