Introduction: Hi my name is Rowanne Clarke and I am debating against the motion of The Public Health Framework -Healthy Ireland will ensure that Irelands Population is healthier into the future. Some of the Key terms: Public Health Framework is Healthy lives, healthy people: Improving outcomes and supporting transparency sets out a vision for public health, desired outcomes and the indicators that will help us understand how well public health is being improved and protected (Public Health England 2014). Health Ireland is a new Government plan that involves every part of Irish society in improving our health and wellbeing. It was published in March 2013. The wellbeing and health of the people living in our country is the most valuable resource …show more content…
It is the Framework which will bring together people and organisations from the length and breadth of the country into a national movement with one aim: supporting all of us to enjoy the best possible health and wellbeing. It is designed to include Government Departments, local authorities and public bodies, businesses and employers, sports and voluntary groups, communities and families (Healthy Ireland 2013). This proposed motion is to be rejected because of these important facts: Healthy Ireland is our public health framework yet it’s failing to address the disadvantages of the Universal Health Insurance which is being considered by the government to become our new health care system. The Universal Health Insurance will cause health inequalities and one of Healthy Irelands aims is to reduce health inequalities in Ireland. Another problem is the lack of support and participation that Healthy Ireland has had in the Mental Health Division Operational Plan 2014. Healthy Ireland developed the framework but did very little in the promotion of the importance of mental health and the effects it has on the public. Universal Health Insurance and its effect on the public and how healthy Ireland effect’s …show more content…
(2014) ‘White Paper on Universal Health Insurance’ [Online] Available from: http://health.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/UHI-Stakeholder-Briefing.pdf [Accessed 16th November 2014]. • Lynch, R. and Broek at van den, E. (2010) ‘The Drawbacks of Dutch-Style Health Care Rules: Lessons for Americans’ [Online] Available from: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/07/the-drawbacks-of-dutch-style-health-care-rules-lessons-for-americans [Accessed 16th November 2014]. • O’Shea, E. and Kennelly, B. (2008) ‘The Economics of Mental Health Care In Ireland’ [Online] Available: http://www.mhcirl.ie/File/ecommhceire.pdf [Accessed 16th November 2014] • Rodgers, S. (2014) Numbers claiming dole falls 7% in year. Irish Examiner, 3rd April. • Public Health (2011) ‘IPH action areas in health inequalities - mental health and wellbeing’ [Online] Available from: http://www.publichealth.ie/healthinequalities/mentalhealth [Accessed 15th November
The Scottish Government. 2004. Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/01/18753/31686. [Accessed 01 March 14].
This essay will discuss how and most importantly, why mental health policy has developed in Northern Ireland throughout the 19th and 20th century. It will first illustrate life inside the asylums, the policies that supported institutionalisation, and why change was needed. Next it will establish the progression in policy to support community and integrated care; it will examine this change and its effectiveness throughout society. Moving onto the 21st century, it will focus on a few of the main policies established throughout this period. Finally a conclusion will be made, assessing the current policy in Northern Ireland and how far we have to go to enhance the quality of life of those struggling with mental illness.
According to editorial one, universal health care is a right that every American should be able to obtain. The author provides the scenario that insurance companies reject people with preexisting conditions and that people typically wait to receive health care until it's too much of a problem due to the extreme costs. Both of these scenarios are common among Americans so the author uses those situations to appeal to the readers' emotions. Editorial one also includes logical evidence that America could follow Canada's and Europe's universal health care systems because both of those nations are excelling in it.
Access to healthcare provides financial stability by assuring people that they will not be financially destroyed by injury or illness. Additionally, when people can afford regular medical care they tend to avoid chronic problems and financial stress. In a study provided by the American Medical Students Association, researchers reviewed the costs and benefits of universal health care. They came to the conclusion, after reviewing other articles and statistics from multiple sources, that, “The annual cost of diminished health and shorter life spans of Americans without insurance is $65-$130 billion.” (Chua 5) This comes from people not having adequate health care and then losing their jobs because they...
Out of all the industrialized countries in the world, the United States is the only one that doesn’t have a universal health care plan (Yamin 1157). The current health care system in the United States relies on employer-sponsored insurance programs or purchase of individual insurance plans. Employer-sponsored coverage has dropped from roughly 80 percent in 1982 to a little over 60 percent in 2006 (Kinney 809). The government does provide...
Bybee, Roger. “Can We Have Universal Health Care?” Dissent 2 (2009): 63. eLibrary. Web. 04 Nov. 2013.
Mental Health Funding Mental health is a subject a lot of people prefer not to talk about, which is a main reason that it is so underfunded. The severe underfunding affects not only the people suffering from mental illness, but also the government, the economy, and society as a whole. It is in the government's best interest to put more funding into mental health due to the health consequences on patients, including weight issues, drastic effects on bodily functions, and difficulties in pregnancy. As well as this
Calma, T. & Dudgeon, P. 2013, Mental health gap must be addressed, The Australian, .
Universal health coverage allows citizens of a particular country access to health care of all kinds, should they so need it, without exposing the user to financial hardship from medical expenses. The World Health Organization has created three objectives for universal health coverage: (1) equity in access to health services – those who need the services should get them, not just those who can pay for them; (2) that the quality of health services is good enough to improve the health of those receiving services; and (3) there is financial risk protection to ensure that the cost of using care does not put people at risk of financial hardship (WHO, 2013). While virtually every developed country besides the United States has some form of universal
More than one-third of Americans who are between the ages of nineteen and twenty-four are uninsured. This is because most insurance is provided through a person’s job, and entry-level jobs which isn 't available for all young students. In addition, healthcare costs are currently rising faster than inflation, which means that salary increases cannot compensate for the higher prices of health care. Government regulation and a universal system could help keep costs affordable. A universal system would guarantee that everyone could receive health care regardless of preexisting conditions. Consequently, more people would be able to seek preventative services, like checkups, to maintain good health and detect problems early. Too frequently, people avoid taking preventative health measures until something is too late because of how expensive it is. While there 's a debate over how the U.S. should pay for a universal healthcare system, a good idea is to study the ways several other countries have successfully implemented such a system. Europe has a system in which all residents pay into a common fund that creates a pool of money and provides benefits to all. We must figure out a way to effectively adopt a universal healthcare system that provides care to all
To reach a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing, an individual or group must be able to identify and to realize aspirations, to satisfy needs, and to change or cope with the environment. Health is, therefore, seen as a resource for everyday life, not the objective of living. Health is a positive concept emphasizing social and personal resources, as well as physical capacities. Therefore, health promotion is not just the responsibility of the health sector, but goes beyond healthy life-styles to wellbeing. Health promotion goes beyond health care. It puts health on the agenda of policy makers in all sectors and at all levels. It directs policy makers to be aware of the health consequences of their decisions and accept their responsibilities for
It is the only social justice health related program that has direct influence on the legality of health issues in government. The goal of the organization is to improve the health of the public and achieve equity in health status. The organization has created a strategic map of what its prospective goals are. The map consists of three circles overlapping each other in a triangle formation, all intersecting in the middle. In the middle lies “The Healthiest Nation”.
The five principles of HP include building healthy public policy, creating supportive environments, strengthening community action, developing personal skills, and reorienting health services (McMurray & Clendon 2015). The first principle aims to incorporate health into all public policy decisions beyond the health system so that living and working conditions become conducive to health and equity (Germov, Freij & Richmond 2015). According to McMurray & Clendon (2015), multi-sectoral collaboration is required among different sectors, such as education, industry and social welfare, with the reciprocally influential policies that guide the community health. The second principle emphasises the socio-ecological approach to health that promotes sustainable environment and broader social support systems that encourage a safe and satisfying life (Germov, Freij & Richmond 2015; McMurray & Clendon 2015). This principle requires to acknowledge the significance of conserving the physical or social resources that allow people to maintain health (McMurray & Clendon 2015). The third principle focuses on information and learning opportunities that enable communities to make knowledgeable choices for better health (McMurray & Clendon
It is deeply alarming that ignoring mental health is systematically ignored as an important part of health promotion. This is shocking because, in theory, mental health is recognized as an important component of health, the close link between physical and mental health is recognized, and it is generally known that physical and mental health share many of the same social, environmental and economic components. We know that facilities dedicated to those with mental health problems are more vulnerable to the resources of physical diseases in many parts of the world, and it is essential that mental health promotion should not be equally affected
Public Health is the science of preventing disease and promoting health through many different ideas and functions by informing society and different community-based organizations. The idea behind Public Health is to protect and serve; it helps improve the lives of countless individuals through promoting a healthier lifestyle, education, research, prevention, detection, and response management. From the beginning, the idea of Public Health has become a stepping-stone that is essential to the longevity of humans and the environment. As society progresses and new advents are created or modified, Public Health