Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Internal and external consultants
Internal and external consultants
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Internal and external consultants
Task 3(b) An internal consultant is, at first glance, just like an external consultant: a professional that is hired to solve an organisational problem and implement the solutions in order to improve the performance of an organisation. Both types of consultants can work within all possible management and organisational areas from strategic planning to mergers and acquisitions, finance, organisation efficiency, process improvement and technology. Similar to external consultants, their sometimes competing internal colleagues can also function as advisors, change agents, execution facilitators, coaches or trainers. The difference lies in the relationship with the client organisation; internal consultants are on the payroll or limit themselves …show more content…
In comparison with the most expensive (external) consultants in the market – strategy consultants – that claim definitely holds up. According to a study in the US, the cost of internal strategy advisors for a typical project is four to six times lower than the rates of one of the Big-3 strategy consultancy firms (McKinsey & Company, Bain & Company or The Boston Consulting Group). Internal advisors have a better understanding of the organisation they advise – they understand the language and culture of the organisation better. Their deep knowledge of the organisation make internal consultants very valuable, for instance, in the implementation of strategic change trajectories or culture transformations; with managing processes and projects; or integrating initiatives within the organisation. In addition, internal consultants have existing relationships with other employees within the organisation, improving their means and channels of …show more content…
External consultants are seen as independent players, contrary to internal advisors who literally depend on their own organisation. This could possibly lead to a trust issue between advisor and client, which is also essentially the employer. Research has shown that clients have more confidence in external consultants than internal consultants. The function often demands an inquisitive and firm hand, a role that external advisors frequently fulfill, and one more difficult to fill by internal advisors. They possibly hold just as much expertise, but as an employee at an organisation it is conceivably harder for internal consultants to be independent – or to be considered as independent – than for external
Internal- What is Danis capable of? (analyze the strengths and weaknesses) By looking at the company’s strong points and weak points Danis will be able to determine the company’s capabilities. According to Knol, marketing strategies, “All factors that are internal to the organization are known as the ‘internal environment’. They are generally audited by applying the ‘Five Ms’ which are Men, Money, Machinery, Materials and Markets. The internal environment is as important for managing change as the external.” (Knol, marketing strategy p 3)
Organizational priorities: To use whether the internal resources or hire outside consultants for training depending on the number of trainings we use and the type of trainings. For the budget constraints we use in-house training.
Outsourcing simply means acquiring services from an external organization instead of using internal resources (Butler, 2000). By using outsourced resources, organizations can gain a competitive advantage by utilizing contingent staff to accomplish strategic goals without incurring the fixed overhead. By focusing on the leading edge and highly specialized skill sets, outsourcing providers can often offer higher quality services, or at a lower price than the client organization. Typical reasons for outsourcing go beyond simple contingent staffing. Outsourcing providers are able to maintain economies of scale with regard to specialization (...
Recently outsourcing has been in the news, especially during political election years. It seems to be a phenomenon that is causing much concern among the population. But exactly how is outsourcing effecting both workers and businesses? And is it as big of a problem as politicians describe?
External partners will build the IT infrastructure for those with weak IT, while a weak Business acumen will benefit from consultants who can provide the Business insights needed.
Business owners may have a heightened sense of anxiety akin to fear once a consultant has been called. The business owner may think the consultant is coming to “change things.” These preconceive notions may affect attitudes and behaviors toward the consultant. This also may be typical in this type of situation surrounding the unknown of unknown persons invading their space (Sturdy, 1997). However, the true nature of the consultant is to simply help the business improve the perceived situation by assessing weaknesses, strengths and recommending solutions.
Information Security (INFOSEC) consultants help client companies through strategic partnerships (Ghodeswar & Vaidyanathan, 2008). A short review of United States outsourcing creates a prospective baseline for outsourcing endeavors of private institutions (Ghodeswar & Vaidyanathan, 2008). Despite the fact that the vendor has accountability and duties (detailed in the statement of work), the client is predominantly in charge of supervising strategic partnerships (Ghodeswar & Vaidyanathan, 2008).
Outsourcing has been around for many years. In this paper I will discuss some of the history of outsourcing, the goods things about outsourcing, and the bad things about outsourcing.
Pitts and Koufopoulos (2012) argue that resources and capability are highly important internal factors that should be taken into account by the organization in order to obtain the successful performance in the long run.
Organizational Change "The effectiveness of organizational change is greatest when a firm’s strategy is consistent with environmental conditions and there is internal consistency." (D A Nadler, 2003:204) The only thing that is constant in this world is change and this is widely acknowledged by many in the world, may it be a corporation or a social forum or a governmental body. What comes in this world has to experience change in the light of environmental elements and pressures and influences, internal or external. The study of organizational behavior gives that environmental factors are the political, legal, economic, demographic, technological, social and societal. While these are the external environmental factors that are and cannot be counted among the controllable factors for an organization, they do in fact influence organizational structure, policies and strategies. In turn, the internal environment of the organization, that is very much controlled by the management of the organization and comprises of the top to bottom managerial levels, the staff, the employees, the board of directors, the owners etc. this internal environment, is to a great extent the result of external environmental factors, the change of which results in the direct impact on the internal environment of the organization. As such in lieu of external environmental factors; change agents with in the organization tend to accept the change in their external factors and tries to bring about a compatible change within the internal environment of the organization. The effectiveness of the change that is being brought about with in the organization as a result of the changing external environmental forces is best when, as described by Nadler, the internal facto...
In a business the external environment contains events, conditions and factors that lie outside the organisation. It helps determine opportunities and risks. A company has to react to what happens outside the business. It cannot determine the likes of a recession or boom. The external environment will alter the internal elements of the business and their objectives and strategic could potentially change. “It includes all efforts made in perfecting the product, economising the cost and maximising the benefits to customers” [13].
Firstly, from a growth aspect, large organizations stopped investing into the future during the economic crisis in 2008 even if they needed to develop and grow. The goal of intrapreneurship is to build the entrepreneurial spirit to support companies’ growth. For example, 27% employees’ absenteeism cause a drop in productivity which translates to a slower growth or even zero growth (Smith 2010). Intrapreneurship therefore helps organizations to grow and expand. Secondly, Innovation is vital for an organization’s achievements, such as new innovations, ideas and products. All the time organizations need to be innovating and must not stop due to any high rates of failure such as 50% to 90%. According to (Smith 2010), organizations need to make innovation success by having the right processes, people, and environment. To be successful in intrapreneurship you need innovation. Finally, from an engagement aspect according to Smith, (2010) between $250 billion and $350 billion annually is costing America’s organizations because of employees lost productivity. Intrapreneurs are engaged in their work when employees feel they are part of the company. This allows the intrapreneur to provide a workplace that is engaging, challenging and meaningful for the workers. The intrapreneur’s passion inspires others to get involved as the employees’ enthusiasm grows, the organization will also develop and grow. Higher levels of employee engagement, more innovation, increase productivity and financial returns what the organizations will achieve if they embrace intrapreneurship. This means if intrapreneurship is chosen it could prove to create successful
Managers are required to conduct an internal analysis in order for the strategic management process to begin. Internal analysis involves in determining the company 's strengths and weaknesses by analyzing its competencies. To have an effective strategies, the organization must exploit and expand on its strengths, as well as reduce or eliminate its weaknesses; thus furthering its competitive advantage, in order to achieve profitability (Hill & Jones, 2014).
Some of the disadvantages hiring externally if good candidates are not chosen it can cause a bad outcome. Also internal candidates can be mad if they have ineffectively made the promotion. Another disadvantage is that it times time to train and training cost more money. Some of the dis advantages of hiring internally are that the company does not get any new experiences or ideas. Also this makes people in the workplace have rivalries which are not good for a company. This can also distract employees from doing their current tasks and
The business environment that firms operate in can be divided into the internal environment and the external environment.