Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Introduction
Human Resources (HR) is responsible for monitoring employee job classifications. The framework of the job description and job analysis ensures a company is compliant and compensates employees fairly. Companies have two options for determining how to categorize their workers, based on the Fair Standards Labor Act (FSLA); employers must recognize an employee job classification as an exempt employee or non-exempt employee. The guidelines suggest the nature of the work performed by the employee determines which classification a company selects. Certain job classifications warrant an employee to receive overtime pay, if a worker works over forty hours during a workweek, which would require the employer to compensate the worker at a higher rate. This process has had conflicts and legal litigation since its inception. There have been numerous complaints filed by employees who feel their jobs are incorrectly classified, and they should be eligible to receive overtime pay. The case below is an example of a legal action filed against employers. These cases are increasing across the country as employer look for ways to augment their payrolls and main production cost.
Whalen v. J.P. Morgan Chase
The case of Andrew Whalen an employee for JP Morgan Chase, involves a conflict with the FSLA overtime exemption provision. The Case hinged on the classification of work performed by the Whalen. Whalen, a mortgage underwriter with Chase, performed mortgage eligibility and approvals based on predetermined guidelines established by Chase. Whalen filed suit and sought a declaratory judgment from district on the grounds that Chase violated the FSLA overtime provision by treating him as an exempt employee and not paying him overtime. Init...
... middle of paper ...
...production position. This employee did not use any analytically discernment outside of the parameter set forth by the company, which would constitute the use of judgment or assessments beyond the guidelines of the company. This would validate the appeals court ruling in favor of the appellant and the reversal of the lower court ruling.
Works Cited
Mullens. (2012, September 5). Do I Have to Pay Overtime? The Fair Labor Standards Act and the Financial Services Industry | Williams Mullen. Do I Have to Pay Overtime? The Fair Labor Standards Act and the Financial Services Industry | Williams Mullen. Retrieved May 18, 2014, from http://www.williamsmullen.com/news/do-i-have-pay-overtime-fair-labor-standards-act-and-financial-services-industry
Walsh, D. (2012). Employment law for human resource practice. (4 ed.). Macon: South-Western Legal Studies in Business.
Susan Kellar contends that she is entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act for work performed prior to the official start of her work shift. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of her employer, Summit Seating, because it found that Kellar's pre-shift activities were “preliminary,” that any work Kellar performed before her shift was “de minimis,” and that Summit did not know that Kellar was engaging in pre-shift work. While we disagree with the district court's conclusions regarding the “preliminary”
III. Issue. The issue is whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the employer appellee on the employee appellant’s sexual harassment claim, and whether the court was right in excluding evidence regarding the sexual
FACTS= On September 24, 1987, Keith Jacobson was indicted on charges of violating a provision of the Child Protection Act of 1984, which criminalizes the knowing receipt through mail of a “visual depiction [that] involves the use of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct.” On Feb 1984 Jacobson ordered two magazines in the mail of young boys. The magazines entitled Bare Boys 1 and Bare Boys 2, contained material of nude young boys from preteen to teens. Jacobson claimed that he want to order material of 18 year olds and up. However Jacobson’s receipt of the magazines was legal under both federal and Nebraska laws. Laws were constructed three months after the order was filled that banned all sexual depictions of children. Soon after the Gov. started setting up Jacobson by sending him applications to phony organizations that were illegally based.
...lley, W. H., Jennings, K. M., Wolters, R. S., & Mathis, R. L. (2012). Employment & Labor Relations. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Bennett-Alexander, Dawn D. & Hartman, Laura P. (2001). Employment Law for Business (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Primis Custom Publishing. Downloaded February 4, 2008 from the data base of http://www.eeoc.gov
Jake Clawson Ethical Communication Assignment 2/13/2014. JPMorgan Chase, Bailouts, and Ethics “Too big to fail” is a theory that suggests some financial institutions are so large and so powerful that their failure would be disastrous to the local and global economy, and therefore must be assisted by the government when struggles arise. Supporters of this idea argue that there are some institutions that are so important that they should be the recipients of beneficial financial and economic policies from government. On the other hand, opponents express that one of the main problems that may arise is moral hazard, where a firm that receives gains from these advantageous policies will seek to profit by it, purposely taking positions that are high-risk, high-return, because they are able to leverage these risks based on their given policy. Critics see the theory as counter-productive, and that banks and financial institutions should be left to fail if their risk management is not effective.
Holley, Jr., W., Jennings, K. & Wolters, R. (2012). The labor relations process. (10th ed.). Fort
Sloane. A. A., Witney, F. (2010). LABOR RELATIONS (13th editions). Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was originally enacted in 1938. The law is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor, and includes 5 major provisions that protect employees. (TEXT) The five provisions include: coverage, minimum wage, overtime pay, youth employment, and record keeping. Coverage refers to the types of workers whom are protected by the FLSA. The FLSA also handles compensation issues like minimum wage, commissions, bonuses, expenses like room and board and other various deductions. To ensure that employees receive adequate compensation for working additional hours the FLSA has developed rules governing overtime pay. The Act also created and implemented rules governing youth
Oct 1993. Retrieved November 18, 2010. Vol. 79. 134 pages (Document ID: 0747-0088) Published by American Bar Association
The FLSA is managed and implemented by the Wage and Hour division of the United States Department of Labor. “The Wage and Hour Division (Wage-Hour) administers and enforces FLSA with respect to private employment, State and local government employment, and Federal employees of the Library of Congress, U.S. Postal Service, and Postal Rate Commission. The FLSA is enforced by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management for employees of other Executive Branch agencies, and by the U.S. Congress for covered employees of the Legislative Branch.” “The law generally applies to all employees of specific enterprises having workers engaged in interstate commerce, producing goods for interstate commerce, or handling, selling, or otherwise working on goods or materials that have been moved in or produced for interstate commerce.” However, workers that are not covered by the FLSA may still be subject to its minimum wage, overtime pay, recording, and child labor provisions if they are individually engaged in interstate commerce or in the production of goods for interstate commerce, or in any closely-related process or occupation directly essential to such production.
Human Resource management plays a major role in all organizations. Human Resources Management departments are in position to protect the organization and the employee from the various laws. The importance of human resources management in health care is a very dynamic in that the human resource management department has deals with rules regulations pertaining to non – clinical and clinical personnel. Over the past 80 years the legal aspects of human resources has transformed. Establishing the right kind or employee to form unions and define certain parameters as the time frame of the work day and employee’s right’s (Fallon and McConnell, 2014). Not having a human resource management in place can be costly to the organizations I f not in compliance with the legislations laws. In this paper I will discuss five major laws that passed legislation and the impact they have had on human resource management in healthcare.
Labour and Employment Law. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.
Suffield, L., & Templer A. (2012). Labour Relations, PH Series in Human Resources Management, 3rd Edition